established to protect against the lack of care upheld by another. The plaintiff has the onus of proof and therefore must prove that the defendant has failed to conform to the required standard and to upholding the responsibilities that accompany their duty of care. CASE- A New South Wales mental health facility was sued for negligence after one of their patience’s killed his friend upon release and then committed suicide, Mckenna and simon v hunter and new England local health district (2013) NSWCA
Words: 533 - Pages: 3
concluded Patsy will not be able to recover medial expenses In order to be successful in her suit against Dylan Patsy must first prove Dylan owed her a duty of care. In this situation there is a duty of care provided in the special relationship between an EMT (Patsy) and patient (Dylan). Next, Patsy must prove there was a breach of that duty. The law considers the following factors: The foreseeable probability Dylan’s conduct would result in harm to Patsy, the severity of the harm to Patsy, and
Words: 550 - Pages: 3
**One example from the text of a case that relates to commercial host liability and duty of care is Jordan House v Menow. This case was about an individual named Menow who was a frequent guest at the hotel and had a tendency to drink too much and act recklessly. A year before the incident occurred he had been banned from the hotel for annoying the other guests and he was only allowed in the hotel with a reasonable person. The night of the incident, Menow entered the hotel with his employer and foreman
Words: 281 - Pages: 2
The Legal and Professional Implications of an incident witnessed during clinical placement. This paper highlights an incident that occurred during a clinical placement. It will also address any legal or professional issues that surround it. Any details of the patient or institution have been withheld to maintain confidentiality. This is in line with the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) Standards of Conduct Performance and Ethics for Nurses and Midwifes (2008). Mr John Jones had suffered
Words: 1077 - Pages: 5
Chief Officer of a non-profit community hospital was out of the country on vacation. A majority of the staff could not make it in for their shifts. Patient units were understaffed and the day shift personnel were forced to work overtime. The nurse on duty left to get dinner. As a result, several injuries from falls out of beds and a death from wrongful medication occurred. There are multiple issues in question in this scenario. The objective of this paper is to identify the legal, ethical and professional
Words: 1103 - Pages: 5
Based on the fact given there is an extent of careless conduct by Tesko. In order for Soo to successfully sue Tesko for her claim there are three elements that need to be established. The first element is there must be an existence of duty by Tesko, breach of that duty and the causation and that the damages are not too remote. Based on the first element, the fact related which is Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 House of Lord [1]. This case was happens on 26th August 1928, Donoghue and
Words: 2479 - Pages: 10
It is human nature to make mistakes; however, mistakes that cause harm to someone else could be considered negligence. In the case with Mr. Benson in the Neighborhood Newspaper article, a mistake was made that was irreversible. He went into the hospital to have his leg amputated, and the doctor amputated the wrong leg. The question is was the doctor negligent in his practice? Is the amputation of the wrong leg considered to be malpractice on the doctor’s part? This paper will differentiate
Words: 332 - Pages: 2
1) The defendant owes a duty of care to the plaintiff. Means-a person has a legal obligation to take care when he can foresee a loss occurring if he acts carelessly. The duty of care is owed to one’s neighbour (neighbour principle in Donohue --v- Stevenson case) – ie those person that are or should be in the contemplation of the defendant as likely to be affected by the defendant’s act or omissions. 2) The defendant was in breach of the duty of care. In determining
Words: 568 - Pages: 3
professional whose misconduct, lack of skill, or fidelity in duties results in injury, suffering, or death due to carelessness or lack of foresight. In a court of law, in order to prove negligence or malpractice, the plaintiff (the injured party) must be able to prove certain elements to establish liability (Guido, 2010). These include duty owed the patient, breach of duty owed the patient, forseeability, causation, injury, and damages. Duty of care involves acting in a way that an ordinary and reasonable
Words: 1225 - Pages: 5
CANADIAN BUSINESS LAW “REASONABLE PERSON” Assignment # 2 GBMP 511-02 Dated: 18-04-2012 REASONABLE PERSON Question: What is the concept of “Reasonable Person” mean? What is the test that determines whether someone has met that test in law? The Concept: A Reasonable person is a hypothetical person who exercises qualities of attention, knowledge, intelligence, and judgment that society requires of its members for the protection of their own interest and the interests of others. Defining
Words: 4082 - Pages: 17
