respect of any breaches of her common law or statutory duty of care and diligence as a director One of the issues raised in the case study is whether Rachael has breached her duties as a director under the common law or statutory duties. Statutory duties are enforced by ROC while common law duties are enforced by the company according to its Memorandum of Association (MOA) and Article of Association (AA) (Mohd Sulaiman & Bidin, 2008). Common law duties are owned by the directors and they must act in the
Words: 1440 - Pages: 6
in order to receive funding from the state. This letter does not mean that you are you are guilty. Premier College is now under a legal duty to preserve all evidence, whether printed or electronic that might become relevant to this matter. Some of this information may be in your possession or control, and as a Premier College employee, you have a legal duty to preserve that information. The purpose of this letter is to explain to you what that obligation means. A team of Investigators known
Words: 445 - Pages: 2
proper period. For example, the auditor may want to test proper cutoff of revenue transactions at December 31. This can be done by examining a sample of shipping documents and sales invoices for a few days before and after year-end. Audit evidence: Audit Evidence is evidence obtained during a financial audit and recorded in the audit working papers. In the audit engagement acceptance or reappointment stage, audit evidence is the information that the auditor is to consider for the appointment
Words: 826 - Pages: 4
approach requires both companies and their auditors to exercise professional judgment in the public interest, by requiring preparers to develop financial statements that provide a faithful representation of all transactions and requiring auditors to resist client pressures”. (Jermakowicz & Mcguire, 2002). Principle Based Accounting There is no exact definition of principle based accounting. Most often it is described as a method where an auditor uses
Words: 1399 - Pages: 6
prove three elements when bringing a claim against negligence: duty of care, breach of duty and damage, which is the cause of breach of duty and is not to remote. Consideration of these aspects in these stages should be noticed, for example Lord Atkin whom founded the neighbour principle mentioned in the Donoghue v Stevenson (1932). Since Caparo v Dickman (1990) duty of care has to be seen as ‘Fair, just and reasonable’. Breach of duty is observed through the standard of care, which is expected by
Words: 2226 - Pages: 9
Question 1 Issue: Is Mark liable in negligence? Does Mark owe a duty of care to Dick? Is Mark liable for the injury caused to Dick? Does Mark owe a duty of care to Laura? Is Mark liable for the psychological suffering caused to Laura? Does Mark owe a duty of care to Tony? Is Mark liable for the injury caused to Tony? Does Mark owe a duty of care to Jacques? Is Mark liable for the blood poisoning caused to Jacques? Law: “Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable person would
Words: 1499 - Pages: 6
Law of tort is a civil wrong other than a claim for breach of contract; and for which a right civil action for damages may arise. Negligence is defined by Winfield and Jolowicz as “Tortious liability arises from the breach of duty primarily fixed by the law; this duty is towards persons generally and its breach is redressible by an action for unliquidated damages”. (Roger, W.V.H., 2006) In Malaysia, the law of tort is largely derived from common law in England. In the law of tort, negligence is
Words: 7008 - Pages: 29
Adequacy of Legal Protection for Auditors Loganathan Krishnan Department of International Business, Faculty of Accountancy and Management, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, loganathan@utar.edu.my This paper was presented at the International Conference on Emerging Issues in Public Law: Challenges and Perspectives, Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 13th to 14 December 2011, Shah Alam, Malaysia. ABSTRACT In Newton v Birmingham Small Arms Co (1906), the English court made
Words: 5159 - Pages: 21
reliance on E’s audited accounts (Peat Marwick) and reports - could not recover money. Sued E’s auditors for alleged negligence. • Issue: whether auditors owe a duty of care to persons other than their clients who have relied on their unqualified reports in entering various financial transactions. • Held: Esanda appealing – appeal dismissed auditors do not owe a duty of care to all users of their info (duty only extends to their clients). o Brennan J: o Mere foreseeability of the possibility that
Words: 543 - Pages: 3
is focused towards the Auditing Issues within the Hastie Group that contributed towards its collapse. The Hastie group was audited by the Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu in 2011. The auditing issues mainly cover Auditor’s Breaches of duty and the potential claim against the auditors. Overall this report would help provide a better picture of the collapse of Hastie Group and the course of action followed. INTRODUCTION Hastie Group Ltd. is known as the top international designer, maintainer and installer
Words: 1767 - Pages: 8
