Self-Assessment Written for the consortium team by Phil Bannister and Ian Baker (Sheffield Hallam University) © University of Northumbria at Newcastle 2000 Published by: Assessment and the Expanded Text School of Humanities University of Northumbria Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST Self-Assessment ISBN: 1-86135-080-5 Text editor: Rebecca Johnson Copy editor: Publications Office, University of Northumbria Designed and produced by the Department of External Relations DER: 2308HCB/6/00J Contents
Words: 13479 - Pages: 54
PUB 535 Performance Assessment Analysis The name of the article is Performance Assessment in Juvenile Correction Education Program. It was published on March 2002 by the Journal of Correctional Education, written by Sheryl Feinstein, an Associate Professor at Augustana College in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The study was conducted to explore and describe the impact of performance assessments, on students on an adjudicated status. These assessments were administered in correctional facilities
Words: 644 - Pages: 3
Running head: MARIA’S ASSESSMENT 1 Maria’s Assessment Ethical or Multicultural Assessment Errors Introduction Please include an introduction to describe for the reader what you will be including in your paper. It is a great way to outline the key requirements and expectations for the assignment. In scholarly writing it is important to include the introduction to provide the reader with a lens for understanding what will be presented in your application
Words: 892 - Pages: 4
Assessment details for ALL students Assessment item 3 — online quiz 2 Due date: Weighting: Time: Online quiz 2 starts in Week 11 and closes in Week 12 in Moodle. Refer to table below for information on test dates. 30% 45 minutes ASSESSMENT 1 Objectives This assessment item relates to course learning outcomes. Assessment task- Online Quiz 2 No. of MCQs Quiz Opening time 9:00 am AEST Time Sunday, Week 11 Closing time 1:00 pm AEST Thursday, Week 12 30 Chapters to be covered 10, 11, 12, 13 Time limit
Words: 545 - Pages: 3
Details of Assessment | Term and Year | Term 4 2014 | Time allowed | N/A | Assessment No | 2 | Assessment Weighting | 30% | Assessment Type | Written | Due Date | Week 6 | Room | 101 George St | Details of Subject | Qualification | ICA50111 Diploma of Information Technology | Subject Name | Disaster Recovery and Contingency Plans | Details of Unit(s) of competency | Unit Code | ICASAS505A Review and update disaster recovery and contingency plans | Details of Student | Student
Words: 928 - Pages: 4
Report Training Evaluation Submitted by Miss Nathaporn Janped 55760213 MissThunchanok Neamsawan 55760541 MissSirada Janthon 55760718 Present Mr. Lorenzo E.Garin Jr Training and Development Naresuan University International College Content Titles Pages Content 2 Introduction 4 Reasons for evaluating training 5 - Formative Evaluation 6 - Summative Evaluation
Words: 3530 - Pages: 15
Assessment Summary I (Pre-test/Post-test) The participants for this portion of the results consisted of 10 Access classes (students who received free admission) and 17 additional classes for a total of 27 classes. Those students in the Access classes were all from elementary schools (grades 3-5) with the addition of one other class for a total of 11 elementary classes (41%); and, those students in the remaining classes were from middle schools (grade 6-8) for a total of 16 middle classes
Words: 445 - Pages: 2
Curriculum Development Using Understanding by Backward Design Some of the challenges of developing meaningful curriculum is that the content has to promote student understanding, retention, and generalization. (Amy Childre, 2009) There is no argument that curriculum development is not a single process, where one type of development fits all. A curriculum designers and educators can look at the works of Ralph W. Tyler, Decker Walker, and Elliott W. Eisner and many others to establish a way of developing
Words: 2023 - Pages: 9
needs of individuals. 4.1. Explain the factors involved in planning the monitoring and assessment of work performance. 4.2. Factors involved in planning the monitoring and assessment of work performance. 4.3. Evaluate the success of the Assessment. 4.4. Explain ways to motivate staff to achieve objectives 4.1. Explain the factors involved in planning the monitoring and assessment of work performance. Business pressures are ever-increasing and organizations are now required
Words: 2201 - Pages: 9
4.3 Be able to promote others understanding of the role of assessment I work with my team to develop their understanding of why we carry out assessments and that there are different types of assessments available dependant the individuals needs. I do this by taking staff with me and they contribute to the assessment process. I identify the services user’s needs and if we are not qualified to provide that services I would advise staff
Words: 702 - Pages: 3
