Week 2 Knowledge Check Study Guide Concepts Intentional business related torts Negligence torts Strict liability torts White collar crimes 100% 100% 67% 100% Mastery Questions 1 2 3 Score: 11 / 12 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Concept: Intentional business related torts Mastery 100% Questions 1 2 3 1. Identify the true statement about a claim of defamation. A. A statement must have the ability to hurt the reputation of an individual in order to qualify as defamatory
Words: 1195 - Pages: 5
located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. Yes, Disparagement such as belittling occurs where Wire Time makes false statements regarding the quality of goods or products electronic recording devices, that may cause loss of business to BUGusa Inc. False or fake negative reviews of a product may also constitute disparagement. BUGusa also have a Libel claim, which the harmful
Words: 382 - Pages: 2
submitted to prof. manjula batra | LAW OF TORTS PROJECT | VICARIOUS LIABILITY | | | SUBMITTED BY:VAIBHAV PRATAP SINGHFIRST SEMEMSTER, 2012BA., LL.B. (HONS.) | | ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would take this opportunity to thank the people who helped me in making this project which has been a learning experience. In that endeavour, first and foremost I would express my gratitude toward my professor of Law of Torts Ms Manjula Batra. Her immense knowledge and teaching skills along with her
Words: 4730 - Pages: 19
BUSINESS LAW A) Jane, a youth worker, confiscates a flick knife from a member of her youth club and gives it to her supervisor. B) Tony, an antique dealer, displays an old military knife with a spring opening device in his shop window with a price ticket attached to it. C) Fola buys an unopened box of kitchen utensils from a car boot sale. Without examining the contents closely she donates the box to a charity shop. The box is found to contain a flick knife. Any individual, who produces
Words: 1557 - Pages: 7
Question 1 This issue with this case concerns the offences committed by the three China bus drivers that went on strike, the required criminal laws to deal with the offences committed are Duress, Tort of Conspiracy, Employment law and Discharge of Contract. As part of the common law, Duress happens when one party refuses to agree into a contract and is forced to agree to the contract by violence or a threat, and also the threat must be of relation to actual physical violence to life, limb or
Words: 1643 - Pages: 7
Preempting Liability Preempting Liability Different liability issues are addressed in the campus of Del Castillo Elementary. The following would be some of the issues that will be covered in this paper: safety in school, intentional and unintentional torts, liability and negligence, supervisor duties, FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act), and student record confidentiality. School safety is and should always be a key component of their campus. As mentioned by Gay (2014), “Representatives
Words: 857 - Pages: 4
Traditional Litigation: Encountering Risks and Reducing Exposure When dealing with traditional litigation, a business or organization will risk scrutiny of the company’s image or brand, and clearly suffers monetary costs, which can affect the entity’s bottom line. Reflecting on the traditional litigation system, dependent on the type of trial, for example, a civil trial, the burden of proof is rested upon the plaintiff. The plaintiff must present truthful evidence or proof to a judge or jury against
Words: 930 - Pages: 4
Torts Assignment PART 1 1) Does Autumn Bay High owe a duty of care to Persephone and Aphrodite? Consider the common law as well as any impact that the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) may have on the common law. The main considerations that have to be taken into account when deciding whether Autumn Bay High owed a duty of care to Persephone and Aphrodite are the reasonable foreseeability of nervous shock and whether their duty of care was non-delegable. Under the Civil Liability Act
Words: 3481 - Pages: 14
the grounds that he did not have the intent to hit Talmage and was therefore not liable for battery. Issue: If an actor intends to inflict an intentional tort upon one party and accidentally harms a second party, can the actor be held liable to the second party for battery? Holding and Rule: Yes. If an actor intends to inflict an intentional tort upon one party and accidentally harms a second party, the actor can be held liable to the second party for battery under the doctrine of transferred intent
Words: 329 - Pages: 2
Product Recall and Associated Liability Professor Muse Business | 670 Legal environment Londone Williams February 4, 2014 Product liability has been a subject that can create issues within a business. There have been various businesses that have gone bankrupt as a result of product liability problems. It is important for a company to consider the risk and liabilities with great consequences. This paper will discuss the significance of product liability and
Words: 1088 - Pages: 5
