Lizbeth Gerena Business Law 201 Writing Assignment 1 Prof. Benichou May 3, 2015 Case Study 1 Crime: The students at Gigantic State University (GSU) committed several crimes when they decided to take over Dunfee Hall. The most dangerous was the assault with a deadly weapon (firearm). Whether it was real or just a play gun it was used to represent a real gun. The victim thought it to
Words: 2057 - Pages: 9
LAW 531 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENTS A+ Graded Tutorial Available At: http://hwsoloutions.com/?product=law-531-week-3-assignments Visit Our website: http://hwsoloutions.com/ Product Description PRODUCT DESCRIPTION LAW 531 Week 3 Assignments Week Three IRAC Brief Case:DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. v. Waxman. August 3, 2012. In the outlined case, DePuy is trying to sue one of their distributors Joint Venture for breach of a non-compete agreement. Under the non-compete covenant Joint Venture disclaim
Words: 1050 - Pages: 5
Case 1 Q1 1. Tort indicates the defendant who undertakes the wrong behavior and not fulfill the duty of care which regulated by the legislation. 2 the plaintiff will be suffered from damage to property and even the personal damage if the duty regulated by the law not be performed. 3 the employer has a duty to take responsibility to employee’s duty of care in the security. If the employer provides the unsafe or defective equipment to the employee on purpose, apparently there would be someone suffered
Words: 1544 - Pages: 7
LAW 5072 FINAL EXAM STUDY GUIDE CONTRACTS Definition: A contract is a promise(s) for the breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance of which the law recognizes as a duty. Offer: Showing a willingness to enter into a bargain in such a way that another person would interpret that they could accept and it would conclude the negotiations. It can be words, actions, advertisements (NOT negotiations, estimates or price quotes.) Acceptance: Once an offer has been made
Words: 1253 - Pages: 6
Apply the elements of the tort of negligence and defences in different business situations Tort is described as an action which causes harm to a person. It is also a law that protects an individual from any harm that may be caused by the unreasonable actions of another. Tort of negligence is considered the unintentional tort. Negligent torts are actions that violated the standard duty of care that caused an unexpected or unintended injury to a person. In negligent tort claims, there are four elements
Words: 874 - Pages: 4
damages for negligent misstatement. In order to evaluate whether these claims are likely to be successful it is necessary to consider the law relating to negligent misstatement. It can be argued that Figaro was deliberately trying to mislead Susanna, as tort of deceit is mentioned in Derry v Peek (1889). It is necessary to prove three elements when bringing a claim against negligence: duty of care, breach of duty and damage, which is the cause of breach of duty and is not to remote. Consideration of these
Words: 2226 - Pages: 9
important to have people in management that possess the skills such needed to solve liability issues in the legal arena, most importantly before they occur.The challenge of the manager is fulfilling his/hers responsibilities by generating profit in business while protecting the interests of otherstakeholders, such as, employees and customers. Though the savvy manager cannot stop people from having the intention and grievances to sue the organization, they can reduce the motive of prospective plaintiffs
Words: 1890 - Pages: 8
Introduction： Aim The aim of this article is to examine the role of the Law of Tort in business activities assessing particular forms of tortuous liability and apply the elements of the Tort of Negligence. Scope It includes the nature of general tortuous liability，the nature of employer’s liability，the application of the elements of the Tort of Negligence and vicarious liability. Background to study Case study No. 1 Facts: A bus belonging to Xiamen Bus Co Ltd had hit a school child on
Words: 1253 - Pages: 6
IRAC Method of Bell vs. Greenbrier Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Shaquita Spruill Business Law (LAW/531) Michael Meeusen September 2, 2013 IRAC Method of Bell vs. Greenbrier Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Case: Martha Bull, 76, who died at the Greenbrier Nursing and Rehabilitation Center April 7, 2008 after staff failed to act on a doctor's orders to get her transferred to a hospital emergency room for treatment of severe abdominal pain. Issue: Has negligence been demonstrated?
Words: 1069 - Pages: 5
Philippine Law Cases Palisoc vs. Brillantes, No. L-29025, 41 SCRA 548 , October 04, 1971 Posted by Alchemy Business Center and Marketing Consultancy at 12:28 AM Labels: 1971, 41 SCRA 548, Civil Law Review, No. L-29025, October 04, Palisoc vs. Brillantes Palisoc vs. Brillantes, No. L-29025, 41 SCRA 548 , October 04, 1971 G.R. No. L-29025 October 4, 1971 Spouses MOISES P. PALISOC and BRIGIDA P. PALISOC, plaintiffs-appellants, vs. ANTONIO C. BRILLANTES and TEODOSIO V. VALENTON, owner and
Words: 5201 - Pages: 21
