Section 300 of the Penal Code Section 300 of the Penal Code mainly lays down the elements that need to be proved upon the conviction of murder by the accused. In this section, it provides 4 clauses as can be seen below : (a) Killing with the intent to kill (b) The accused intended to inflict bodily injury on the victim and knows that death is likely the result of the bodily injury. ( It combines both the elements contained in the second and third limbs of s 299, that is the intention to inflict
Words: 2815 - Pages: 12
Personal Property Case Study The case study “Parking Lot’s Liability” is an actual court case, Allright, Inc. v. Strauder. Plaintiff brought suit alleging that as a result of defendant's negligence, his automobile was stolen from a parking lot operated by defendant. Signs were located throughout the parking lot which stated that the lot closed at 6 o'clock p.m. and that anyone returning after that time could pick up their keys at another parking lot operated by the defendant at a another
Words: 680 - Pages: 3
deals the environment in ‘’reactive’’ as opposed to ‘’managerial’’ manner, since it is predominantly concerned with remedying any interference with a landowner’s rights over his or her land. These rights were mainly protected under the common law of torts, which provides for four causes of action on environmental problems. These are nuisance, trespass, negligence and strict liability. NUISANCE Nuisance involves the unreasonable interference with another’s use and enjoyment of land. It is the most
Words: 1361 - Pages: 6
Case Study #1: Accusatory Statements not Defamatory, 11th ed. 1. Explain what a plaintiff must prove in order to establish an action for defamation. A plaintiff must prove that a false statement by the defendant concerning the plaintiff was made, actual or presumed damages, or fault amounting to negligence. 2. How does libel differ from slander? They are both types of defamation, but libel is the written or printed public defamation of a person or entity, and slander is the spoken defamation
Words: 371 - Pages: 2
Legislation Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) | Purposive approach- S 15AA (1) – have regard to objects and purposes that Parliament was seeking to achieve Use of extrinsic material- S 15AB – courts may look at extrinsic material such as Parliamentary debates, reports of law reform commissions etc Rules as to gender and number s 23 In any Act, unless the contrary intention appears: (a) words importing a gender include every other gender; and (b) words in the singular number include
Words: 1570 - Pages: 7
#4 – According to the case, why was this not a case of negligent infliction of emotional distress, and what tort did the court approve? According to the case, this was not a case of negligent infliction of emotional distress because the coffee was not actually spilled on the child by Burger King itself and the company did not take part in how the coffee was spilled on the child. The tort that was approved by the court was punitive damages. Punitive damages were approved because it could not be proven
Words: 263 - Pages: 2
answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. Wiretime has not committed any torts to my knowledge because Bugusa equipment was not working as it supposed to so that the company could use it as an option. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. The contractual relationship the company and Janet have that interfered with Wiretime.
Words: 450 - Pages: 2
Business Regulation Simulations Identifying Legal Issues |Legal Issues |Legal Principals | | Negligence-Breach of Duty | Company failed to show leadership and a proper system in place during the spill. | | |Breach of Duty. “A failure to act when there is a duty to act” (Cheeseman, 2010) | |FOIA Inquiry
Words: 412 - Pages: 2
LEG 500: Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance | Assignment 3-Employers Duty of Care | 8/14/2011 | 1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are “in or out of his scope of employment.” The definition of “Scope of Employment” according to Oklahoma States Risk Management and Environmental Health and Safety is, “Scope of employment: means performance by an employee acting in good faith within the duties of his office of employment or of tasks lawfully assigned by a competent authority including
Words: 669 - Pages: 3
Remedies: Breach of Contract Introduction There are various remedies available to an innocent party where there has been a breach of contract. The main remedy is damages, but in certain situations, equitable remedies are available. 1. Unliquidated Damages Unliquidated damages are assessed by the court and are designed to compensate the innocent party for any losses incurred as a result of a breach of contract. However, where loss can not be proved, the innocent party will only be entitled to
Words: 1634 - Pages: 7
