who has to show it is a fair and “ unconscionable” contract. This specific article also includes the statute of frauds in which a sale of goods over $500 is involved. Here is example of Article II UCC enforceable contracts: Summary of Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, 251 Minn. 188, 86 N.W.2d 689 (1957). 1 Facts Great Minneapolis Surplus Store (D) published advertisements in a newspaper for a sale on fur coats, mink scarves, and a lapin stole. Each of the advertisements indicated
Words: 705 - Pages: 3
Case with sample answer Radio station QUES (Station), put an identification tag on a large bass fish it named "Big Bertha" and placed it in a nearby lake (the Lake) as part of a promotional fishing contest. Station advertised the contest during radio broadcasts, but required no formal entry. The advertisement stated that anyone who caught Big Bertha on hook and line and presented it to Station would be entitled to a $5,000 cash price. Betty and Sam often went boating at the Lake with friends.
Words: 1161 - Pages: 5
Element of contract The objectives of element of contract are to explain the requirement of a valid offer and acceptance which lead to the formation of a contract provided other essential elements, In other word intention to create legal relations and ,in most cases, consideration are also present. problem also arise in connection with the need for writing in some cases and the capacity of the parties. That it decides that where an offer is in the form of a promise for an act, the performance of
Words: 5381 - Pages: 22
acceptance there should be an awareness of the offer (Taylor v. Laird [1856] 1 H&N 266) and the offer should be present in the offeree’s mind (R v. Clarke [1927] 40 CLR 227) acceptance must match the terms of the offer precisely this is called as the “mirror image rule” according to this always the acceptance should be the mirror image of the offer which means acceptance should agree to all the terms of the offer. (Butler machine tool co. V. Ex-cell-o corporation [1979] 1 WLR 401. Redlox, Bedlox
Words: 818 - Pages: 4
Medical Technology (Pte) Ltd v Modern Pak Pte Ld (2006) o Contracts for certain transactions must be evidenced by a written note of memorandum otherwise they are unenforceable Eg. Assignment of copyright and transfer of real property # NOTE: Parol Evidence Rule Primacy of a written agreement over oral statements : Oral (Parol) evidence will not be admitted in a court action to add to , vary, amend or contradict a written contract - Evidence Act S94 – Engelin Teh Practice LLC v Wee Soon Kim Anthony (2004)
Words: 2321 - Pages: 10
As a Legal consultant for TAMs College-an Educational institution based in UK, below are some of the basic legal issues the management and partners need to know in order to form a valid contract. A contract is an agreement reached between two or more parties which is legally enforceable when executed in accordance with specific requirements. For a contract to be legally binding, the following concepts must be present: Offer Acceptance, Intention to create legal relations, Consideration
Words: 833 - Pages: 4
the two parties have reached agreement on the terms or whether a valid offer has been made is an issue which is determined by the courts using criteria known as 'the objective test' which was explained in the leading English case of Smith v. Hughes.[2] In Smith v. Hughes, the court emphasised that the important thing in determining whether there has been a valid offer is not the party's own (subjective) intentions, but how a reasonable person would view the situation. Unless the offer included the
Words: 2902 - Pages: 12
Grown-up persons (over the age of 18) who are of sound brain, and counterfeit persons, for example partnerships or corporations , have full contractual limit. Minors might additionally be bound by contracts: * for ‘necessities’ Scarborough v Sturzaker (1905) 1 TasLR 117 In this case, Scarborough, a minor, had to use his bicycle to go to work.
Words: 2904 - Pages: 12
natural meaning, the Literal Rule gives it. Even if the outcome or result is silly, under this rule the Literal meaning must be followed. In R v The City of London Court Judge (1892) Lord Esher stated that once words have clarity in an act they must be followed even if they lead to manifest absurdity. An example of the Literal Rule was in the case of Whiteley v Chappel (1868) states that in the aim of preventing electoral malpractice a statue made it an offense to impersonate ‘any person who was entitled
Words: 3327 - Pages: 14
In case of Mr A and Mr Mr C: There is no contract; this is an invitation to treat. And on another hand Mr. C made verbal agreement not to sell the book to anyone else until Mr. A phones him back in three days with a new offer, this is a new contract, but it does not exist yet. In the case of Mr A and Mr C, Mr A can claim that these was an agreement, and intention because it was a commercial arrangement, he also claim he providing consideration by offering to call back with a new offer. Mr C can
Words: 848 - Pages: 4
