The Forgotten Group Member Group Development Working in a group to achieve a high quality group project can be one of people’s most difficult school experiences. Working in a group is tough because there is often someone who does not pull their own weight. “There are five stages to group development, adjourning, forming, storming, performing, and norming” (John & Wiley pg 166). Christine’s group from the Case Study the Forgotten Group Member is in between the Storming and Norming Stages
Words: 973 - Pages: 4
Case Study of “The Forgotten Group Member” In this case the most of the team appears to be in the “Norming” stage of development. The text (Organizational Behavior 11th ed. Pp167) describes this stage as the “point at which the members really start to come together as a coordinated unit”. Assignments and roles within the group have been defined, and most of the members have made progress on their given assignments. However the major issues in the group’s development that needed to be addressed
Words: 871 - Pages: 4
– Case Study 7 – March 23, 2013 Case Study #7 – The Forgotten Group Member March 23, 2013 Part I: Group Development The team’s current stage of development is the performing stage. According to the text, this is where the team members begin to deal with complex tasks and handle disagreements creatively. The group appears to be stable, motivated by team goals, and generally satisfied. (Schermerhorn, Hunt, & Osborn, 2012). This is where most of the group appears to be right now, with
Words: 1014 - Pages: 5
------------------------------------------------- CASE 7: The Forgotten Group Member Part I: Group Development The formation of a group consists of five important stages. The stages are adjourning, forming, storming, performing, and norming. These stages are critical because it creates stability and union ship among people to form teamwork. In the case study the group dealt with inconsistency and social lofting from a few of the group members. Group member Diane was “quiet and never volunteered suggestions
Words: 882 - Pages: 4
|Keller Graduate School of Management | |The Forgotten Team Member | |Case Study | |
Words: 692 - Pages: 3
1 Week 3 Case Study The Forgotten Group Member Janail Richard-Brown 8565 W Sam Houston PKWY S Houston, Texas 770?? Jrich_26@yahoo.com 713-988-1038 GM 591 Leadership Organizational Behavior Kim Nugent January 23, 2012 Group Development As of right now, the group is somewhere between norming and performing-this stage is actually called storming. My reason for using the two stages is that one group member is still not performing up to standard (Mike). I find that this has occurred and been
Words: 697 - Pages: 3
Case Study 7 DeAngela L. Dixon Deangelaldixon@yahoo.com- GM591-WBREY September 19, 2010 Part I: Group Development Bruce Tuckman developed a four stage model of group development in 1975 he added a fifth stage. The first stage is forming and that is the “getting to know each other” phase. This stage is basic orientation (Schermerhorn, Hunt and Osborn 2010) and the group members identify with other group members. This stage also defines the task and how to approach
Words: 1009 - Pages: 5
Case Study: The Forgotten Member Kristin Kovar GM591 – Leadership and Organizational Behavior Dr. Anne Hallcom Part 1 Group Development: The group is currently in the norming stage. The first meeting the group went through the forming stage by introducing themselves and talking about their schedules. They joked around and had a good time and started to bond together. They worked through some dysfunctional issues during the next week or two when Mike became upset that he felt excluded from
Words: 1667 - Pages: 7
Through utilizing the information from the case study of “The Forgotten Group Member,” and the explanation of the stages of team development in the course textbook, Organizational Behavior, (2010, p. 166) of forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning, the majority of the group members are in the norming stage, but never resolved issues that started in the storming stage. Therefore, collectively, they are still in the storming stage. The group is in a state of conflict because Mike is non-committal
Words: 1773 - Pages: 8
1) To what extent were the members of that team or group clear about the goals of the team or group, what they were expected to achieve and how their performance would be evaluated? How were these things communicated to members? 2) The make up of the team or group- how were people chosen or selected to be members; what different skills/knowledge/experiences did they bring with them into the team or group: and how this was coordinated or managed to get the most out of each individual but also
Words: 996 - Pages: 4
