Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete In India. Summary of the case The case of Coke and Pepsi in India is a lesson that all marketers can observe, analyze and learn from, since it involves so many marketing aspects that are essential for all marketers to take into consideration. Both companies had many difficulties, especially Coca-Cola, and it's useful to observe how it dealt with the different aspects, stating from the political environment of the Indian market and the trade barriers it faced
Words: 1258 - Pages: 6
“Coke and Pepsi learn to compete in India” case 1. The political environment in India has proven to be critical to company performance for both PepsiCo and Coca- Cola India. What specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles? Could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? If not, could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? A/ The Indian government was unfriendly to foreign investors, because outside investment
Words: 1002 - Pages: 5
Summary The case traces the history of the struggles both companies encountered during the start-up phase of their business. During the 1990’s, India’s government opened its door to foreign investors and PepsiCo entered into India and Coca-Cola re-entered four years later. Both companies had many difficult situations to overcome and eventually had to recognize that India’s market was very different and a special knowledge, skills and local expertise was needed to be obtained if both companies wanted
Words: 822 - Pages: 4
Case Two: Coke and Pepsi learn to compete in India 1) The political environment has played key role in the following ways: Indian government viewed as unfriendly to foreign investors. Outside investment have been allowed only in high-tech sectors and was almost entirely prohibited in consumer goods sectors. If an item could be obtained anywhere else within the country, imports of similar items were forbidden. This gave Indian consumers have little choice of products or brands and no guarantees
Words: 756 - Pages: 4
the authors discuss the notion that players learn from past experiences and have a perfect memory. They discuss a “tit-for-tat” strategy that should over time result in an attenuation of the competitive moves between players. This interaction over time should make it easier for a firm to predict the direction and nature of their rival’s next (competitive) move. The authors suggest in Hypothesis 2a that the volatility of the relationship between Coke and Pepsi’s competitive moves
Words: 1266 - Pages: 6
soft drink industry been so profitable? We will use the Porter’s Five Forces framework to demonstrate why the soft drink industry – where Coke and Pepsi were, and still are, the two largest players – has been so profitable. Historically, several factors indicated high barriers to entry. Firstly, the successful consolidation and vertical integration of Coke and Pepsi’s bottling networks created an extensive, and almost exclusive, distribution prowess. In addition, franchise agreements since 1987
Words: 1309 - Pages: 6
Case 1-3 Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India Tyler McBee MKT 3450- 01 17 September 2013 3. Both Pepsi and Coca-Cola have effectively attempted to accommodate their products to the tastes and preferences of India. As an advertisement and sponsorship method, both companies have partnered with cricket, movies, and music. These three entertainment industries are very popular in India. Something that has set Pepsi and Coca-Cola apart from other companies in the food industry is partnering
Words: 601 - Pages: 3
Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India A. Identification of issues and Problems Step 1—overview of the case study During the 1900s and the beginning of the new millennium India’s government had opened its doors wide open to foreign investors, but the Coca-Cola Corporation and PepsiCo experienced many difficult challenges. Both companies were engulfed with unexpected problems and difficult situations that led to the recognition that India’s market was very different and special
Words: 1965 - Pages: 8
has proven to be critical to company performance for both PepsiCo and Coco-Cola India. Some aspects were: ïŠ Adjustments in the Indian government like new procedures set of laws and a closed system ïŠ Change in the names of each company (Lehar Pepsi & Coca Cola India) ïŠ Problems with the water contamination ïŠ The policies that excluded international companies ïŠ Boycotts of American goods ïŠ Low demand for carbonated drinks ïŠ Prohibition of imports If they could provide in a
Words: 990 - Pages: 4
Global Marketing Group 8 Alfaro. Alonzo. Barreiro. Corral. March 19, 2015 Cruz. Garcia. Gregorio. Sing Prof. Benjie Sandoval Case 2: Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India I. INTRODUCTION When the world’s two giant soft drink companies Coca-Cola and Pepsi entered the Indian market in the 1990s, they experienced several problems and difficulties. These setbacks led them to realize that what works for one country will not necessarily work
Words: 2939 - Pages: 12
