Running head: Cola Wars1 Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century University of Redlands Deborah Bedgood-Ealy Professor Richard Doyle March 12, 2015 Coca-Cola and Pepsi function in the soft drink industry as dominating players and have remained market leaders for a long time. The key competencies of Coke and Pepsi range from the product, supply chain and distribution, marketing and customer loyalty. Each of them has developed operating procedure. The supply chain
Words: 2396 - Pages: 10
COLA WARS CONTINUE COKE and PEPSI IN 2006 Adityo Wibowo (10 / 310520 / PEK / 15397) Yohan Suryanto P (10 / 310533 / PEK / 15410) Muhammad Jusuf (26E1024) MAGISTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS GADJAH MADA UNIVERSITY 2010 PROFIL PERUSAHAAN Pada 8 Mei 1886, Dr.John Stith Pemberton, ahli farmasi berkebangsaan Amerika mencampurkan jenis sirup, obat elixir, French Wine of Coca, Bordeaux, kokain dan kafein (yang berasal dari biji kola). Ramuan itu adalah
Words: 1823 - Pages: 8
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First CenturyI. Case issue: Implications of strategic rivalry on cola industrys structure and performance (See Exhibits 1 & 2 for analysis) A. Implications on structure of cola industry 1. Bottlers have been consolidated by concentrate producers (CP), placing smaller CPs at the mercy of Pepsi and Coca-Colas distribution systems (See Exhibit 3) a. Making it tougher for smaller CPs like Cott Corporation to compete and leaving them open to the threat
Words: 1805 - Pages: 8
Cola War Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 The following characteristics are important to conclude the competitive intensity and attractiveness of the CSD industry: the threat of substitute products, the threat of established rivals, the threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of suppliers and the bargaining power of buyers. First, the threat of substitute products such as sports drinks, juice and bottled water is relatively high to the CSD industry due to the shift in consumption patterns
Words: 488 - Pages: 2
as evidenced by their ever-growing brand portfolio and internal processes. In this paper, I discuss Coke's three cola strategy as both a product and service innovation. Such strategy was implemented to widen the market presence of Classic Coke, Diet Coke and Coke Zero. The three cola strategy was developed initially for the purpose of rekindling the growth of the sparkling beverages. The strategy is basically a campaign to boost public confidence wherein an array of marketing, advertising and promotion
Words: 3270 - Pages: 14
Qiaona Wan @03428256 EXP 102-004 Professor Jacob 10/08/2014 Coca-Cola v. Pepsi: Cola Changes the World When I eat at a restaurant which I have never been to, I always order Coke without knowing what the restaurant’s special is. And my friends who join me the meal do the same thing. Nowadays, cola is becoming an important even necessary part of our daily life. Even though we are informed that cola is relatively unhealthy, we still cannot resist
Words: 2093 - Pages: 9
COCA COLA VENDING MACHINES COCA COLA VENDING MACHINES 11/22/2015 Selling coke through interactive vending machine a good or bad idea? From the coke’s perspective, selling through vending machine is a good idea because they have earned higher margins for the firm. This channel has been untouched by the price wars unlike the distribution through supermarket where price wars have lowered the margins considerably. Sales of soft drinks from vending machines have risen steadily over the
Words: 861 - Pages: 4
case “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010,” use game theory approach/analysis to explain the competitive behavior of Coke and Pepsi making specific references to actions taken by each firm and the different “battlefields.” What conclusions can you draw about the competitive strategies pursued by both companies? At the time the Case was written was there a winner? Should both companies have acted differently? The game theory approach used between the two CSD giant Coke and Pepsi was at times
Words: 315 - Pages: 2
with Coke and Pepsi, together with their associated bottlers, commanding 73% of the case market in 1994. Adding in the next tier of soft drink companies, the top six controlled 89% of the market. In fact, one could characterize the soft drink market as an oligopoly, or even a duopoly between Coke and Pepsi, resulting in positive economic profits. To be sure, there was tough competition between Coke and Pepsi for market share, and this occasionally hampered profitability. For example, price wars resulted
Words: 3381 - Pages: 14
ALAIMO Massimo Maria AYARI Neila CALVAGNA Giorgia CRUCITTI Alessia Case study Cola Wars continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 Google Inc. Nucor at Crossroad Caterpillar Tractor Co Komatsu Ltd. Crown Cork and Seal Apple Inc. in 2010 Cola Wars continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 Google Inc. Nucor at Crossroad Caterpillar Tractor Co Komatsu Ltd. Crown Cork and Seal Apple Inc. in 2010 Cola Wars continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 Google Inc. Nucor at Crossroad Caterpillar Tractor Co Komatsu Ltd. Crown Cork and
Words: 809 - Pages: 4
