a broad understanding of the Sources of Laws of Kenya: • The Constitution • Legislation • Delegated Legislation. • Statutes of General Application in force in England on 12th August 1897. • Substance of Common Law and doctrines of equity. • African Customary Law. • Islamic Law. • Hindu Law. • Judicial Precedent (Case Law). INTRODUCTION The term sources of law literally means where rues of law are found. This
Words: 10311 - Pages: 42
statute was created that authorized powers to administrative tribunals by designated actors. Administrative law is a set of principles and concepts common to all these different areas of law: Human Rights, Immigration, Law society, Health and etc.. Procedural Fairness: Procedural fairness otherwise known as ‘Natural Justice’, is an implied common law duty to act fairly in decision-making by exercising statutory powers which may affect individuals right. It is more concerned with the procedures
Words: 712 - Pages: 3
New Mexico Statute Melissa L. Shuey Kaplan University 1. This statute was enacted by the legislature of the State of New Mexico. 2. The language contained in the New Mexico statute is primarily mandatory. The beginning of the statue uses “shall be” and “shall not be,” both of which are mandatory phrases. Additionally, subsection (1) continues with mandatory language when it states, “No individual shall receive benefits…” and “…that a person shall not be denied….” However, some discretionary
Words: 729 - Pages: 3
Super Freakonomics: Short Essay questions Chapter 1: Describe the evidence that suggests that Chicago prostitutes engage in price discrimination. In addition, explain why it is possible for this particular instance of price discrimination to be successful. There is a couple of different things that directly show how Chicago prostitutes engage in price discrimination, the first is by skin color. The book directly says “Prostitutes do not charge all customers the same price. Black customers
Words: 1727 - Pages: 7
MEMORANDUM Supervising Attorney 29 DEC 2015 Personal Jurisdiction Out of State Business Transactions FACTS Froogle a California based company, files a complaint against Mary, a client from Vermont. Mary argues that California does not have personal jurisdiction over her. All business is done over the internet; Mary has never been to California. ISSUE Does California have personal jurisdiction over Mary? RULE Snowney v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc., 35 Cal. 4th 1054, 1055
Words: 416 - Pages: 2
Mexico: An Emerging Market Country Mexico has one of those economies that many people tend to overlook and undervalue. I am unsure as to why many take Mexico out of the equation when looking at the world market investment and business options, however, in my opinion, Mexico is a strong emerging market country. Perhaps many Americans are frightened of sending their investment money into the Mexican economy because of the negative press Mexico is always getting. Not more than a month or two seems
Words: 1185 - Pages: 5
ANTH 350 7980 Health, Illness, and Healing (2158) 11-19-2015 Stage 1: Ethnographic Assessment An inventory of health/illness related product in the household In an ordinary household, it is common to find medication, medical devices, and or food supplements associated to a specific health-related condition or illness. An assessment of my household reveals the following products: Prozac Paxil Amoxicillin Furosemide Esmilol Vitamin C, Multivitamin, Pottassium, iron Ambien Lunesta
Words: 1171 - Pages: 5
spouse, or a child under 16, of a person covered by sub-subparagraph (A) or (B) Section 6(1)(a) of the ITTA1936 defines a resident of Australia as a person other than a company who resides in Australia. Under common law, this test is referred to as the ordinary concepts test. In the cases of Levine v IRC (1928) and IRC v Lysate (1928), it was held that a broad range of factors will be considered in determining ordinary residence such as the maintenance of a place
Words: 915 - Pages: 4
INTRO: Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose’s remarkable 1954 play, portrays the trial of the accused, a 16 year old boy from the slums of New York, who will face death as a result of a guilty verdict. Consequently, twelve jurors attempt coming to a unanimous decision. Although justice is ultimately secured, prejudice is an evident theme in the play. Twelve Angry Men explores personal prejudice in the justice system by revealing how preconception overwhelms the juror’s ability to see reason, by the jurors
Words: 595 - Pages: 3
Question 2(a) In fact, reducing the costs, focusing on the core business and enhancing the quality are three main reasons that firms concern. Referenced from the case, the hourly wage of a lawyer in US is much higher than the one in India. The total cost of finishing the job in a US firm should be higher than the outsourcing price due to the gap between salaries. Costs can thus be reduced. Outsourcing helps a firm to focus on its core business. When a firm outsources the labor-intensive works
Words: 702 - Pages: 3
