Access the PCAOB Website ( www.pcaob.org) and list two new or proposed auditing standards issued by the PCAOB. Auditing Standard no .18: Related Parties The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved a new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) standard on auditing transactions with related parties and amendments to PCAOB standards on significant unusual transactions and a company’s transactions and financial relationships with its executive officers. The standard includes new
Words: 564 - Pages: 3
if you believe that the current model should be improved but have a different idea about how this should be accomplished. 2. Consider the different parties involved in the auditor’s report, such as client managers, auditors, investors, and audit committee members. Put yourself in their shoes. How do you think these parties might differ in their views regarding if the IAASB’s model should be adopted or if the current model should stay “as is”? In your answer, please be specific and identify
Words: 1068 - Pages: 5
Changing Methodologies in Financial Audit and Their Impact on Information Systems Audit Doctoral School – Accounting and Management Information Systems Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania dan.vilsanoiu@gmail.com, mihaela.serban@gmail.com This paper tries to provide a better understanding of the relation between financial audit and information systems audit and to assess the influence the change in financial audit methodologies had on IS audit. We concluded that the COSO Internal Control
Words: 5254 - Pages: 22
those in charge of governance within an organization. The SAS 115 requires the auditor to make communications, in writing, to management regarding imperative deficiencies and material weakness in internal controls that are noted in audit reports. It clarifies standards and provides guidance on communicating matters related to an entity’s internal control over financial reporting identified in an audit of financial statements. The new SAS No. 115 is going to affect this department in three different
Words: 476 - Pages: 2
statement of the company for the 3-month period ending July 31, 1986; assistance in the preparation of a registration statement to be filled with the SEC; a comfort letter to be submitted to company’s underwriters and full scope audit for the fiscal year. But the full scope audit was never completed because “Ernst & Whinney” resigned due to growing concerns
Words: 1399 - Pages: 6
there is a misstatement he or she must inform the client in writing. Once a control deficiency is identified, the auditor must determine whether the deficiency is a significant deficiency or material weakness. According to SAS 112 and the AICPA’s Audit Risk Alert (2011), defines the factors to consider, including the likelihood that a deficiency will continue and the magnitude of the misstatement or potential misstatement. Additional information that will be needed in the Care for Kids cases would
Words: 474 - Pages: 2
115 when performing internal control audits. The rules have some similarities. However, the key differences in the rules are the definitions for control deficiency, significant deficiency, and material weaknesses. The change in rules also creates more opportunities for accounting firms to offer services. Similarities between SAS 112 and SAS 115: Similarities exist between SAS 115 and SAS 112. The rules require auditors to look at deficiencies found during an audit. The auditor must continue to identify
Words: 1974 - Pages: 8
Chapter 2: The Risk of Fraud and Mechanisms to Address Fraud: Regulation, Corporate Governance, and Audit Quality 1. The auditor is not responsible for the presentation of financial statements; therefore, the auditor has no responsibility for fraud in the financial statements. FALSE 2. An example of fraudulent financial reporting is the CFO intentionally overstating sales to boost profits. TRUE 3. The auditor is responsible for actively considering fraud risks in order to
Words: 6460 - Pages: 26
1. Ernst & Whinney never issued an audit opinion on financial statements of ZZZZ Best but did issue a review report on the company's quarterly statements for three months ended July 31, 1986. How does a review differ from an audit particularly in terms of the level of assurance implied by auditor's report? 2. SAS No. 106 "Audit Evidence," identifies the principal "management assertions" that underlie a set of financial statements. The occurrence assertion was particularly critical for ZZZZ Best's
Words: 304 - Pages: 2
ZZZ Best, Case 1. Ernst & Whinney never issued an audit opinion on financial statements of ZZZZ Best but did issue a review report on the company’s quarterly statements for the three months ended July 31, 1986. How does a review differ from an audit, particularly in terms of the level of assurance implied by the auditor’s report? There are numerous differences between performing a review and actual audit on the financial statements, but the major one is that the review does not contemplate
Words: 1300 - Pages: 6
