—Level of Market. 3. —Time Dimensions of variables. 4. —Sales. 5. —Competitive Strength. 6. —Profitability. 7. —Risk. 8. —Demand on resources. 9. —Utilization of resources. APPROACHES TO PRODUCT PORTFOLIO : Standardized approaches to Product Portfolio analysis are : — 1. BCG Growth Matrix. 2. —AD Little Business Profile Matrix. 3. —The Shell International directional Policy Matrix. 4. —The
Words: 355 - Pages: 2
Introduction 1.1 Background CMC was a leader in the industry for over 25 years since 1946 in concrete block business. Even if it is a leader in different reasons .But it is not competent in the new prestressed concrete business CMC uses matrix structure but it is not a reason for its failerity in prestressed business, instade the top managements didn’t recognize the changing nature of prestressed concrete business in the industry. When the prestressd industry gained wide industry acceptance
Words: 1485 - Pages: 6
can be paid for through insurance. The following sections of this analysis outline the competitive landscape that DCB is positioned against. Each competitor profile contains a description of its measurable elements and how DCB compares. Along with the competitor profiles, we have constructed a competitive matrix to critically profile and compare DCB against its known competitors; a comparative matrix to individually identify specific technological components of a direct competitor that has a
Words: 1771 - Pages: 8
Boston Product Matrix The Boston Matrix was developed by the large US consulting group BCG (Boston Consulting Group). This matrix is a powerful tool that assists the firms planning their product portfolio. It has two controlling characteristics: relative market share and market growth as suggested from the figure below. [pic] Figure 5: Boston Corporate Group matrix It has four cells and each cell has its name as follows. • a. Dogs. The products that fall in this cell are the ones with a
Words: 1531 - Pages: 7
Balochistan University of information techonology engineering and management sciences | Implementing Strategic Management | APPLE Inc. | Rabia Iftikhar 12285 | MBA 5th B | Jun 24, 2013 | | | | | | Ma'am Mehwish Shahid Think Different ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Praise and thanks to “ALLAH” Almighty, the one testing us all at all times and making decisions
Words: 5388 - Pages: 22
1. Identify the firm’s existing vision, mission, objectives, and strategies: Vision “To be the worldwide leader in sharing delicious tastes and creating joyful memories.” Mission “To touch and enhance lives through the joy that is Krispy Kreme. “ Objectives 1. Reduce the investment required to produce a given level of sales and reduce operating costs by operating smaller satellite stores instead of larger, more expensive factory stores.
Words: 2264 - Pages: 10
StrategyFormulation Framework Stage 1 - Input Stage EFE Matrix IFE matrix CPM Stage 2 - Matching Stage SWOT SPACE matrix BCG matrix IE Matrix Grand strategy matrix Stage 3 - Decision Stage QSPM Please note this is not a comprehensive source for studying Ch 6 -6 2 Strategy-Formulation Framework External Factor Evaluation Matrix (EFE) Stage 1: The Input Stage Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix (IFE) Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) Please note this is not a comprehensive
Words: 2262 - Pages: 10
industry Rank the key success factors by giving each one a weighting - The sum of all the weightings must add up to one. Rate each competitor on each of the key success factors Multiply each cell in the matrix by the factor weighting. This can best be displayed on a two dimensional matrix - competitors along the top and key success factors down the side. An example of a competitor array follows:[4] Key Industry Success Factors Weighting Competitor #1 rating Competitor #1
Words: 626 - Pages: 3
integration in value chain * An organization may decide to go from one value chain to other value chain * From economists’ point of view in a competitive market, there will be atleast 3-4 competitors of equal caliber and market share would not be more than 35% for a given company. In theory there has to be numerous competitors for a perfectly competitive market. Case: ONGC India – In search of new growth strategy ONGC has gone for vertical integration during Mr. Raha’s tenure. Mr. Sharma has to
Words: 1040 - Pages: 5
analysis Vision, Mission, Value The Five Forces Framework PESTEL Framework External Audit CPM-Competitive Profile Matrix External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix Financial Ratio Analysis Internal Audit Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix SWOT Matrix SPACE Matrix Grand Strategy Matrix The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix The Internal-External (IE) Matrix The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Recommendations Page 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 20 Introduction:
Words: 3238 - Pages: 13
