INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendant Grand Canyon Education, Inc.’s (“GCE”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. 4) and Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. 21), and Defendant Grand Canyon University, Inc.’s (“GCU”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. 6) and Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. 22). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motions are DENIED. II. BACKGROUND A. FACTUAL BACKGROUND GCE is a Delaware corporation
Words: 3660 - Pages: 15
You Decide ES Review the Virginia Pollard case information located at the beginning of this project: You Decide ES. (If you click here, you will return to the face-sheet of the project area. To return to this page, click the Beginbutton again. You can do this all week.) To do well on this project, study the readings for this week and consider the work we did in Week 5. You may want to do some outside research for this project as well, reviewing recent case law on discrimination and harassment
Words: 2883 - Pages: 12
Complaint Against: Tata Docomo I'm using tata docomo postpaid connection for last one year. In my bill dated on 25-Nov-2012, I got huge bill amount above my limit. I have complained 'N' number of times to tata docomo customer care but the issue is not resolved till date. I have not activated ISD call in my account but customer care executives say that it has been activated on 7th of November 2012. I would like to know by what source I have confirmed ISD call activation. I have not given any written
Words: 6044 - Pages: 25
) PLAINTIFF, ) ) CIVIL ACTIONS NO: ____________________ vs. ) ) ) JUDGE: _____________________________ ANHEUSER BUSCH and ) FRANK CUELLAR ) ) DEFENDANT ) COMPLAINT COMES NOW, plaintiff, Justin King and for his complaint, alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was a resident of the County of Paxton, State of Illinois. 2. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that defendant, Anheuser Busch
Words: 1215 - Pages: 5
Title • Messa (P) v. Sullivan & Keyman’s club (D, A) Citation: what court or reporters • Court: Appellate Ct of IL, First District, First Division • Cited as: 61 Ill.App. 2s 386, 209 N.E. 2d 872 Author: judge • Judge Burman Facts: • P suffered injury at the Keyman’s Club bldg, Chicago: 1st and 2nd fl has many stores (bowling alley, barber shop, acocktail lounge, banquet and meeting rooms), 3rd fl for a labor union office, and 4th fl empty. 5th fl is residence for Sullivans and
Words: 1735 - Pages: 7
(Cite as: 212 Ill.App.3d 380, 570 N.E.2d 1227, 156 Ill.Dec. 505) 15 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 503, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 12,851 Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. David B. GARAVALIA, as executor of the Estate of Arvo Lake, a deceased person, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HEAT CONTROLLER, INC.; Addison Products Company, Inc.; O.G.F. Corporation, doing business as Giles Appliance Center; and Odell Giles, individually, Defendants-Appellees. No. 5-89-0749. April 19, 1991. Decedent's estate
Words: 6094 - Pages: 25
Simon Jose Al hajj Mr Nazih Jurr Bad 429 – Operations Management 12 June 2012 Question 1 Analyzing the data in the table proves that not all the audience is satisfied with what is offered while attending a football game. Several complaints were recorded on different matters. Some complained about parking and traffic, others about the seating and that the stadium needs re-innovation because it became old. Most of the people surveyed were students, staff and alumnus, overall they constituted
Words: 919 - Pages: 4
objection of the public by good words and by giving gifts, but this doesn’t seem to last long. The company is now reluctant to use “incinerators”. Issues One major issue raised in the case is what the company should do to minimize the public complaints on pollution. Should the company also install incinerator? There are numerous factors related to the case such as ethical, environmental, legal, social, political, technological and economic. The company went against ethics by misleading the public
Words: 521 - Pages: 3
I. Style of Case and Citation: Waters v Min Ltd 587 N.E.2d 231 (Mass.1992) II. Court Rendering Final Decision: Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts III. Identification of Parties and Procedural Details Gail A.Waters Plaintiff, Thomas Beacuchemin., Defendant. IV. Discussion of the Facts: Gail Waters (plaintiff) owned an annuity contract worth $189,000, with a total potential value of $694,000 over 25 years. When Waters was 21, she began dating Thomas Beauchemin (defendant), who had
Words: 765 - Pages: 4
Ethic at Work Name: Professor: Institution: Course: Date: Possible violations if complaint is true The likely violations if the grievance is real would fall under intentional torts and in particular the invasion of privacy. Under intentional torts there are four limbs of privacy torts. These are appropriation, intrusion, false light and public disclosure of embarrassing private facts. However, the fact pattern that is depicted in the
Words: 1222 - Pages: 5
