Hamilton County Judges in their three courts Common Pleas, Domestic Relations and also Municipal Court, have all been accessed and placed in ranking. After analyzing the data I have discovered how many cases have been appealed and reversed within each court. The probability of cases being appealed or reversed in the Common Pleas Court is 0.1129, In the Domestic Relations Court the Probability is 0.1604 and lastly the in the Municipal Court the probability of the case being appealed or reversed is 0.2080
Words: 821 - Pages: 4
solution. The cause for such backlog of cases is institutional and the delay in disposal of the cases, is due to procedural laws. Administrative institutions have failed to monitor the status, substance and pace of litigation in the courts. The beginning of the modern ADR movement is from United States of America. As Chief Justice Warren Burger of the U.S. Supreme Court once observed on noticing the increase of cases from 2000 to about 5000 in the US Supreme Court between 1963 to 1982 made the
Words: 3667 - Pages: 15
have been learning the history of the American court system and courtroom work group. There are two kinds of court functions in the American criminal justice system. The system is called a dual court system consisting of federal and state court systems (Schmalleger, p. 308, 2011). In order for the court system to operate there has to be a courtroom work group. A courtroom work group is made up of the judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, bailiffs, court clerk, expert witnesses and others who earn
Words: 625 - Pages: 3
Week Three Read Me First criminal courts INTRODUCTION This week focuses on the criminal court system. Courts are typically limited in geographical jurisdiction and in the cases that they can hear. The United States has a dual court system in which the courts closely resemble and complement one another. The courts also have what is known as a courtroom work group that consists of the judge, prosecutor, defense attorney, baliff, clerk, and court reporters. The roles of the courtroom workgroup
Words: 682 - Pages: 3
Case Study 1 – Hamilton County Judges 1. Based on the information provided in the Hamilton County Judges’ case study, the probability of cases being appealed and reversed in the three different courts are as follows: a. For the total cases disposed in the Common Pleas Court there is a 0.1129 probability of a case being appealed and reversed. b. For the total cases disposed in the Domestic Relations Court there is a 0.1604 probability of a case being appealed and reversed. c. For the total
Words: 879 - Pages: 4
indisputably perceive what is contemplated acceptable today may conceivably be malevolent and vice versa perchance deplorable now and adequate in future. To understand the antagonism of free trial and free media one has to reflect on the evolutions of court and media and its present scenario. The judiciary and the media share a common bond and play a complimentary role to each other: man is the centre of their universe. Both the judiciary and the media are engaged in the same task: to discover the truth
Words: 7585 - Pages: 31
Report – Appendix Court | Date | Name | Case | Stage | Noted as | Supreme | 25/03/09 | Anthony Farell V R | Criminal | Appeal | C1 | | | Mohammed Ali V South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service | Civil | Trial | C2 | | | Gerard Michael Mcguirk V UNSW | Civil | Trial | C3 | District | 27/03/09 | R V Liam Paul Irwin | Criminal | Appeal (severity) | C4 | | | R V Warren James Ure | Criminal | Trial (adjourned for sentence – part heard) | C5 | Court Report Note: Refer
Words: 797 - Pages: 4
Del Lago Partners v. Smith Smith sued Del Lago on a premises liability negligence theory that Del lago has failed to protect him from the third party aggravated assault. All-in-all, the court reached a defendable decision. The court repeatedly makes clear that its holding should not be construed to require property owners to ensure the safety of their patrons from the criminal acts of others in other circumstances. PLF's brief, which was filed in support of neither party to address the complicated
Words: 486 - Pages: 2
Participation The court systems in the United Stated seem to be a big soap opera; everyone is a character and has to play their roll. Everyone at one point in their lives has been cast in a position of either the defendant of the plaintiff. You make characters are the Judge, bailiff, the prosecutor, the attorney, the jurors, the court clerk, and transcriber. The judge is the one that everyone has to report to and he/she will be the one that determines the outcome of the case. When you address
Words: 414 - Pages: 2
Trial and Appellate Courts State and appellate courts work with each other but have very different roles in the justice system. State courts listen to facts about a case and try to keep the victims and the accused rights from being violated. Appellate courts make sure that the rights of the accused have not been violated. In the state courts system an accused has a right to a jury of peers. It is up to the state to prove burden of guilt while the accused does not have to prove they
Words: 310 - Pages: 2
