GPR 213: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW GROUP ASSIGNMENT GROUP TWO MODULE 1 NAME | ADMISSION NO. | SIGNATURE | OCHOLA BRIAN ODUODI | G34/3233/2014 | | NASIBI TIMOTHY MURWA | G34/3404/2014 | | KIPINGOR EMMY CHEBET | G34/3308/2014 | | ABDI FARDOSA MUSTAFA | G34/3287/2014 | | WALEKHWA B. STEPHEN | G34/3319/2014 | | CHARLOTTE MUTAI | G34/3331/2014 | | SIKUKU CORNELIUS WANGILA | G34/3392/2014 | | CHABI BRIAN OTIENO | G34/3399/2014 | | WANJALA GILBERT MASINDE | G34/1417/2010 | | MURIMI MARTIN
Words: 3124 - Pages: 13
Criminal Law Paper Humberto Camacho CJA/354 Criminal Law July 13, 2015 Instructor Peter Lukevich Criminal Law Paper A recent Supreme Court Case that was decided was ARIZONA et al. v. UNITED STATES. This case was argued on April, 25, 2012 and a decision was made on June 25, 2012. This case came about in 2010 when the state of Arizona enacted a statute known as S.B. 1070. This statute addresses the large number of illegal aliens that are in the state of Arizona. “Fed up with illegal
Words: 773 - Pages: 4
California Coast University BCJ360-SG Criminal Law 2. What is the historical basis of the ex post facto and bill of attainder provisions, and why would they have application in today’s legal system? Ex Post Facto means “After the Fact” is law that is made retroactive to punish an act that wasn't illegal at the time it was committed. The reason the Constitution prevents Congress and the states from writing ex post facto laws is to protect the population and other entities from
Words: 376 - Pages: 2
The criminal law procedure is an integral but distinct part of criminal law in Canada. It is distinct from the substance of criminal law in that it does not define the type of conduct that constitutes a criminal offence or establishes punishment, but rather determines by whom and in what circumstances prosecutions against accused offenders may be initiated, conducted, terminated and appealed. Criminal law procedure is a set of rules according to which the substantive law is administered. The principal
Words: 560 - Pages: 3
[Jurisprudence (laws 2017)] | Assignment Two: Reading Assignment. | Ronald Dworkin: Taking Rights Seriously 1. What conventional statement/theory about adjudication is Dworkin setting out to criticize or explore? Ronald Dworkin sets out to criticize and explore the theory about adjudication that judges are employed by the law. This theory embodies the idea that adjudicators
Words: 654 - Pages: 3
[pic]Maynooth University Department of Law Declaration on Plagiarism I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Law and Business, is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Student Name: Nicoletta Hodyas Student Number: 13383056 Date: 20/04/2015 Student Signature: Nicoletta Hodyas Assignment title:
Words: 2462 - Pages: 10
Doctrine of vicarious liability The doctrine of vicarious liability generally operates within the law of torts. It has become well-established in English law and historically has been called “Master and Servant liability,” which clearly indicates the circumstances in which the doctrine becomes applicable in tort law. The general rule in tort law is that a person who authorises a tort will personally be liable for damage or harm as a result. However, vicarious liability defines the circumstances
Words: 2814 - Pages: 12
The five categories of criminal law violations are felonies, misdemeanors, offenses, treason and espionage and inchoate offenses. Felonies are criminal offenses punishable by death or by incarceration in a prison facility for at least a one year. I believe felonies are very serious and they can include crimes like murder, rape, aggravated assault and robbery. In some states it is tradition for people who are convicted of a felonies are incarceration leads to grounds for an uncontested divorce. I
Words: 501 - Pages: 3
point across 1) Discuss the differences in burden of proof under criminal and civil law. Criminal law: The Burden of Production: The burden of proving the defendant's guilt is up to the prosecution, and they must establish the fact beyond a reasonable doubt. A prosecution is the attorney charging against the person committing the crime. Reasonable doubt is making sure that the prosecutor has no lack of evidence for the jurors. Civil law: Burden of Persuasion: The plaintiff has the burden of proving
Words: 406 - Pages: 2
The day to day implementation of expert evidence on people still takes place in law, and in some cases without any sufficient evidence against these people. The purpose of this essay is to find the rules of the expert’s evidence opinions in criminal law and how the experts can present the evidencein any case. What is the procedure of the judge which can accept the expert witness opinion or to test the evidence before admitting it to the court. Recognising the issues which have happened in the past
Words: 2196 - Pages: 9
