companies selling same or substitutes of a product is an important determinant of the performance of the companies. However, firmly established companies enjoy competitive advantages in the market hence leading to their stable existence. Among businesses that enjoy these benefits include the Coca-Cola Company. Coca-Cola took part in securing of its competitive advantages in lots of ways. The company’s history is a huge determinant the space Coca-Cola occupies when you talk of competitive advantages
Words: 645 - Pages: 3
11/3/2008 FIN720 | Baitshepi Tebogo| 9302747|MBA | term paper | CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND DIVIDEND POLICY DISCUSSION: How does Standard Chartered Bank Botswana contribute to this discussion? | TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 3 Historical Background 4 Literature Review 6 Research Objectives 21 Methodology 22 Challenges 23 Methods 24 Data Analysis 25 Conclusion and Recommendations 27 References
Words: 7155 - Pages: 29
Diversification strategy and capital structure of multinational corporations Imed Eddine Chkir a,1, Jean-Claude Cosset b,* Faculty of administration, Uni6ersity of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier Street, Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1N 6N5 b Departement de finance et assurance, Faculte des sciences de l’administration, Uni6ersite La6al, ´ ´ ´ Quebec, P.Q., Canada G1K7P4 ´ Received 3 April 1999; accepted 22 October 1999 a Abstract This study examines the relationship between the capital structure of multinational corporations
Words: 10717 - Pages: 43
CHAPTER 12 Risk, Cost of Capital, and Capital Budgeting Multiple Choice Questions: I. DEFINITIONS WACC e 1. The weighted average of the firm’s costs of equity, preferred stock, and after tax debt is the: a. reward to risk ratio for the firm. b. expected capital gains yield for the stock. c. expected capital gains yield for the firm. d. portfolio beta for the firm. e. weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Difficulty level: Easy CAPM b 2. If the CAPM is used to estimate
Words: 3901 - Pages: 16
the company in a way which maximises the long term return to the shareholders, and thus maximises the company’s profit and cash flow. However, Jensen and Meckling (1976) observed that mangers do not always run the firm they work for to maximise shareholders’ wealth. From this observation, they developed their agency theory, which took into account the principal-agent relationship as a key determinant in determining firm performance. According to their definition, “An agency relationship is a contract
Words: 727 - Pages: 3
CRITICAL TALENT OF THE 2. 3. 4. ORGANIZATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SELECTED ORGANIZATIONS DR. GEETA BANSAL & DR. PARUL PANDEY CONSUMER ATTITUDE AND PERCEPTION TOWARD BRANDS OF EDIBLE OIL: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY AMITA SHARMA & DR. D. S. CHAUBEY CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND ITS IMPACT ON PROFITABILITY OF AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY: THE INDIAN CASE SANJAY HIRAN & DR. MAHENDRA SOJATIA MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN INDIAN BANKING SECTOR: AN IMPACT ANALYSIS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SELECT SURVIVING COMMERCIAL BANKS (INDIAN
Words: 8606 - Pages: 35
and Capital Structure of Privatized Firms in Europe ´ ´ MARIA JOSE ARCAS & PATRICIA BACHILLER Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain ABSTRACT The objective of this paper is to analyze whether there are differences in performance between private firms and recently privatized firms in the European Union, as well as to determine whether ownership (state-owned versus private) and regulation affect capital structure
Words: 7717 - Pages: 31
firm's capital Structure is unimportant on the market value of all firms' securities, and consequently the firm's performance and shareholders' value. “The market value of any firm is independent of its capital structure and is given by capitalizing its expected return at the rate appropriate to its class. “This model depends on two keys, arbitrage and homemade alternative (borrowing on personal account). Arbitrage is the process that ensures that two firms differing on laying their capital structure
Words: 7319 - Pages: 30
business? b. How did the Sulzberger family manage to retain control on the NYT after it went public? c. How does the NYT dual class structure differ from the one used by Dow Jones, prior to its takeover by Rupert Murdoch? d. What explains the behavior of the NYT institutional shareholders – not just Morgan Stanley but also Private Capital Management, T Rowe Price and Vanguard? e. How should Arthur Sulzberger, Jr. respond to Morgan Stanley’s proposal? 2. Valuing
Words: 1229 - Pages: 5
Bachelor of Finance & Banking Thesis -------------------------------------- The impact of capital structure on profitability of listed construction companies on Hanoi Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2013 FALL 2014 Instructor Mr. Tran Viet Dung Group members Nguyen Thi Thanh Tam (FB00464) Nguyen Thi Viet Chinh (FB00405) Hoang My Linh (FB00073) Dang Thi Hong Hanh (FB00253) Nguyen Thi Kieu Trang (FB00078) Hanoi, December 2014 Table of Contents List of tables 3 List of figure 4 Abstract
Words: 20311 - Pages: 82
