Managing Thru Employment At-Will Employee lawsuits are distracting, expensive and some would argue – avoidable. Over the past 20 years, employee lawsuits have risen 400% and the settlements could cost hundreds of thousands, if not, millions of dollars for the company (Craemer, 2010). It is important that company personnel, managers and their employees alike, understand the policies that could lead to an unpleasant and messy litigation process. In this paper, we will discuss four employment situations
Words: 2061 - Pages: 9
in or out of “his scope of employment” The actions of Jake’s work on the vehicles that include checking breaks, tires, and the transmissions is included within his scope of employment. The scope of employment includes any tasks that are included in the contract of the position that an individual is hired to complete (USLegal). This also includes any specific task that an employer asks an employee to perform. The purpose of documenting an individual’s scope of employment is for the employer to be
Words: 1592 - Pages: 7
completing the required tasks. When an employer hires the employee it is their duty to explain to them their expactations, and in turn it is the duty of an employee to understand what is expected of her. Based on the employment-at-will doctrine, the firm is legally allowed to terminate her employment. Even if they specified that an employee would only be terminated “for not doing their job successfully” (NCSL Home, 2012) She does not meet the expactations because she does not have the skills and requirements
Words: 1243 - Pages: 5
is a right to hire and fire state. There is a common law notion stating that, without any type of formal employment contract, employees have the right to quit their jobs any time they want to, regardless of whether or not they have a reason. By the same token, employers have the right to fire employees any time, whether they have a legitimate reason to do so or not (TN website). “Employment at Will” policies cannot be utilized by employers in any discriminatory manner, according to federal law
Words: 834 - Pages: 4
FACTS Melissa who owns a contracting company, hired by the state of Ohio to perform road repairs including using dynamite to blast dangerous rock and overhangs. The company closes down the road and proceeds with the dynamiting. The guard hired to make sure no cars enter the area falls asleep while on duty. Jim, who did not see road closure signs drives into the danger zones causing his car to get hit by falling rock and Jim suffers severe injuries from the company's negligence. ISSUE (1)
Words: 818 - Pages: 4
Employment-At-Will Doctrine LEG 500: Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance \ SCENARIO 1 According to the “Employment at Will Doctrine”, “the employer has the right to fire the employee with no reason at all “ (Ingulli & Halbert, 2012, pg 46). However In this scenario the reason should be due to her inability to perform required task related to her job functions. The manager has giving the employee three months of training and support to learn the required
Words: 1015 - Pages: 5
submitted to prof. manjula batra | LAW OF TORTS PROJECT | VICARIOUS LIABILITY | | | SUBMITTED BY:VAIBHAV PRATAP SINGHFIRST SEMEMSTER, 2012BA., LL.B. (HONS.) | | ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would take this opportunity to thank the people who helped me in making this project which has been a learning experience. In that endeavour, first and foremost I would express my gratitude toward my professor of Law of Torts Ms Manjula Batra. Her immense knowledge and teaching skills along with her
Words: 4730 - Pages: 19
Employment -at- will involving skills, competence, and abilities. Employers should ensure their employees are equipped with the right training to perform their job on a daily basis. This increases the employee’s confidence and their moral, in order to do their job, to meet the standards of the department. Basic new hire training might not always be sufficient for some employees. The employee may also need side by side training, with one of the department’s core employees, to demonstrate the
Words: 1588 - Pages: 7
aforementioned doctrine but still subject to exceptions . Although the termination is viewed as legal under the law , the authorities have come up with exceptions in to safeguard the rights of employees and to prevent employers from abusing their right to terminate pursuant to the doctrine In this case , there was an illegal termination of the services of Mary based on the exceptions . There was a breach of implied covenant of good faith or fair dealing in this situation . This breach of employment pertains
Words: 290 - Pages: 2
Employment-At-Will Doctrine Ayesha Kapoor LEG-500 – Law, Ethics and Corporate Governance Dr. Angelina Audrey 28th July 2012 Employment-At-Will Doctrine: At-Will employment is a doctrine of American Law, that defines an employment relationship in which either party can immediately terminate the relationship at any time with or without any advance warning and with no subsequent liability, provided there was no express contract for a definite term governing the employment relationship and that
Words: 2380 - Pages: 10
