committed the crime unless she would actually offer sexual services to another person in exchange for money. Another example is an employee who agrees in an employment contract not to solicit business from a company’s customers after the contract has terminated but sends a letter of solicitation to company customers once his or her employment contract ends. The letter constitutes a solicitation and is considered illegal. However, in order to prove that a defendant is guilty of solicitation, there
Words: 1089 - Pages: 5
Assignment 1: Employment-At-Will Doctrine 1). Question one (Involving Skills, Competence, and Abilities). To begin with, I would first meet with the individuals from my company and department that met with and interviewed Jennifer. I would want to know what types of questions were asked of Jennifer and how she answered those questions. I would want to know if Jennifer was asked about using technology and if she seemed comfortable using computers at school in completing
Words: 1876 - Pages: 8
Vicarious liability is a legal tort doctrine that assigns responsibility upon one person for the failure of another, with whom the person has a special relationship (such as employer and employee or owner of vehicle and driver), to exercise such care as any reasonable prudent person would use under similar circumstances. In other words, it imposes strict liability on employers for the wrongdoings of their employees, who have acted negligently. 2) The elements of the doctrine include that: the person who
Words: 1056 - Pages: 5
Case Brief The Issue Whether the state of Nevada should judicially adopt the doctrine of strict liability? If so, was there a defect in the manufacture of the Squirt bottle that caused the plaintiff’s injuries? The Rule Of The Law Public policy demands that manufacturer, distributor, retailer, in other words, all in the chain of distribution must be held strictly liable
Words: 938 - Pages: 4
Employment-at-Will & HR To The Rescue LEG500 Professor Kapalko 2 February 2014 Summarize the employment at will doctrine and evaluate each of the 8 scenarios. The employment at will doctrine is a common-law rule that an employment contract of indefinite duration can be terminated by either the employer or the employee at any time for any reason; also known as terminable at will. Traditionally, U.S. employers have possessed the right to discharge their employees at will for any reason, be
Words: 1771 - Pages: 8
Date The doctrine of Respondeat Superior is one that directly translated from Latin means “let the master answer”. This is the doctrine that seeks to have the eventuality of any cases of organizational ethics being answered for by the organizational heads as opposed to the employee show may have performed them. The doctrine underscores the fact that the employer is responsible for the employee and the job that he does as long as he is in the employment of that employer. It is essential
Words: 432 - Pages: 2
As the Chief Operating Officer (COO) of a midsize company that is preparing for an Initial Public Offering (IPO), I discover several personnel problems that require my immediate attention. It is my duty to be familiar with the Employee-at-will Doctrine and any exceptions if any that may apply to the employees and my employer. While preparing to deal with our personnel problems I discover that my company does not have a Whistle Blower Policy in place and I will address this issue with my CEO. As
Words: 1682 - Pages: 7
John Stuart Mill was born on might twenty, 1806 in north London, the oldest of 9 youngsters. presently when his education, John followed his father into employment at the archipelago Company wherever he remained in leadership positions till the company's ending in 1858. Mill's early writings and contributions to philosophy were revealed in 2 newspapers, The human and also the Morning Chronicle, each emended by associates of his friends. the unconventional philosophical journal City of Westminster
Words: 722 - Pages: 3
HROB 153 Employment Law ------------------------------------------------- Rojo and Toland IRAC Curt Marchione HROB 153 (Section 3) May 19, 2015 HROB 153 Employment Law ------------------------------------------------- Rojo and Toland IRAC Curt Marchione HROB 153 (Section 3) May 19, 2015 Factual Summary of Rojo v. Kliger Rojo v. Kliger, 801 P.2d 373 (Cal. 1990) Plaintiffs Emma Rojo and Teresa Maloney were employed as assistants by defendants Erwin H. Kliger, a practicing physician
Words: 2000 - Pages: 8
AT-WILL-EMPLOYMENT Written By: Karla McCleskey Submitted to : G. Alexander Weimer, Jr LEG 500 January, 23, 2011 1 In the United States employees without a written employment contract can be fired “for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason at all”. This topic alone has been around since the nineteenth century, and has given employers unfettered power to dismiss their employees without being thereby guilty of a legal wrong. Many employees believe
Words: 1163 - Pages: 5
