Some of the many types of Logical Fallacies .American Intercontinental University PHIL 201- 1401B-02 Week 3 Individual Assignment Introduction: Logical Fallacy: A logical fallacy is an error in reasoning. In other words, it is a factual error or a failure to logically support the conclusion in an argument. An argument is a group of statements about a specific topic where a stand is taken applying premises needed to support their conclusion. A fallacy is a type of argument where the person
Words: 1375 - Pages: 6
Terms Quiz I CRT 205 Week 2 Subjectivism and Value Judgments Quiz CRT 205 Week 2 Chapter Review Quiz CRT 205 Week 3 Analyzing Credibility CRT 205 Week 4 More Fallacies Quiz I CRT 205 Week 4 More Fallacies Quiz II CRT 205 Week 4 Psychological Fallacies Quiz I CRT 205 Week 5 Categorizing Fallacies CRT 205 Week 5 Identifying Fallacies Checkpoint CRT 205 Week 6 Argument Quiz I CRT 205 Week 6 Deductive Inductive Logic Quiz CRT 205 Week 6 Evaluating Arguments Quiz CRT 205 Week 6 Unstated Premises
Words: 570 - Pages: 3
Ben Franklin Fallacies Paper One of the most important aspects of effective persuasion is avoiding being caught in the traps of logical fallacies. The word “fallacy” comes from Latin, meaning “deceit,” “trick,” or “fraud.” Although sometimes these types of errors are hard to catch, so learning to recognize logical fallacies can help to be a better writer, listener, student, and voter. Don’t be fooled by the twisted rhetoric of another. Likewise, you need to avoid misleading your own audience
Words: 519 - Pages: 3
at hand. However, the author makes a few fallacies in an effort to persuade the readers. In particular, Musaddique claims that, “While some private sector firms finally wake up, London’s BAME [Black Asian and Minority Ethnic] public sector workers face the indignity of knowing they were paid up to 37.5 per cent less than their white colleagues last year.” (Musaddique, “We Need to Address…”) This section of the article demonstrates one of the many fallacies the author presents. Musaddique creates generalizations
Words: 1750 - Pages: 7
Thank You For Arguing, composed by rhetoric advocate Jay Heinrichs, is a popular persuasive work written in 2007 (but revised many times since then) that expounds over the art of persuasion. Jay Heinrichs was a previous journalist and publishing executive before studying and writing about the “lost art of rhetoric”. Heinrichs is also the author of many other great reads and the father of two children, Dorothy Jr. and George. Since his experience as a journalist, Heinrichs has taught persuasion to
Words: 652 - Pages: 3
determine: The facts (conjecture) The meaning or nature of the issue (definition) The seriousness of the issue (quality) The plan of action (policy). constitutive rhetoric - the capacity of language or symbols to create a collective identity for an audience, especially by means of condensation symbols, literature, and narratives. rhetoric as adaptation discourse community - groups that have goals or purposes, and use communication to achieve these
Words: 1361 - Pages: 6
students should take advantage of student loans because there are many benefits that students should experience while they’re still in school. In Hopkins’ article, she explains the four benefits of taking out loans to get a higher education and uses rhetoric appeals to support her points. Even though Hopkins successfully shows the good ethos and pathos to the readers, but the article still lacks logical appeal. The thesis of Hopkins article Student Loans Pack Surprising Benefits is
Words: 936 - Pages: 4
the introduction and speech there are examples of fallacies, rhetorical devices, and bias. The first example of bias is delivered when introducing Kane. The campaigner introducing Kane refers to “the evil domination of Boss Jim Gettys,” this clearly indicates bias in favor of Kane, and also is an example of the ad hominem fallacy by attacking Jim Gettys rather than his arguments. The campaigner also uses the scare tactics and the false dilemma fallacy when he states “There is only one man who can rid
Words: 607 - Pages: 3
fallacious reasoning used is Mark Twain’s The Dangers of Lying in Bed. Fallacious Reasoning Mark Twains The Dangers of Lying in Bed contains many fallacies and I’d like to go into detail on at least 1 example of each type of fallacy that is used. I will quote lines from his story and follow it with a fallacy title and description on that fallacies applicability. In the beginning of the story the man in the ticket office says, “But it is for accident insurance, and if you are going to travel
Words: 465 - Pages: 2
This is using subjective fallacy creating a rhetorical double hitter, especially in an election year. No mention about the immigration bill currently sitting in Congress held up by a majority that do not approve. Another point not mentioned, hidden by smoke screens of ongoing rhetoric is there are other recent presidents, President Ragan, and President Clinton that passed sweeping immigration reform. The whole argument given by the author is based on False Dilemma Fallacy that has no bases. President
Words: 325 - Pages: 2
