Public License and its Role The LINUX software and other products are restricted with a License or patents to keep individual from altering or modifying the software. Developers usually release their software programs the way they think it best suit the potential business owner or users. The General Public License (GNU) role is to ensure when new software is released that it remains free to everyone to use as they please. The GNU role is to remove any software that has no source code. The parts that
Words: 519 - Pages: 3
Linus Benedict Torvalds – (born December 28, 1969) is a Finnish American software engineer, who was the principal force behind the development of the Linux kernel. He later became the chief architect of the Linux kernel, and now acts as the project's coordinator. He also created the revision control system Git as well as the diving log software Subsurface. He was honored, along with Shinya Yamanaka, with the 2012 Millennium Technology Prize by the Technology Academy Finland "in recognition of his
Words: 1567 - Pages: 7
Unit 1 Assignment 1 * Chap. 1 1.) What is Free Software? a. Here are three characteristics of free software. * The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0) * The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2) * The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs (freedom 1) 4.) What are the Free Software Foundation/ GNU? What is Linux? What else has helped refine this OS? a. The (FSF) is a 501
Words: 527 - Pages: 3
Critique #4 Android Insecurity Source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353485811701040# Generally speaking, almost every issue comes up with double-edged sword. In today’s society, Android operating system is also no exception. Along with its open source code released by Google under the Apache license, the security issue is becoming more and more significant and emergency. Whether or not the Android operating system is designed with any intrinsic security initially, from
Words: 598 - Pages: 3
advantage of software development and cost sharing. The initial step is to recognize what it means to have a closed or open system, and what components are needed and will make up the requirement for software or an application to function. With both closed and open sources functioning differently as to how the system is programmed and structured and how the system will function within a software application or program. OPEN SOURCE Operating systems of an open source can be defined as free software
Words: 714 - Pages: 3
Paper: Free and Open-Source Software NT1430 – Linux Networking Research Paper: Free and Open-Source Software As the name so aptly implies FOSS is software that is both free and open source. It is liberally licensed to grant users the right to use, copy, study, change, and improve its design through the availability of its source code. This practice is becoming increasingly widespread and gaining acceptance because of the potential benefits that could arise from its use. The “free” part
Words: 343 - Pages: 2
Donald C. Dodd POS 355 06/09/2014 Dr. Bruce Huang Operating Systems: Open or Closed Source One of the biggest questions when choosing an operating system is whether it is free or not. Let’s face it cost face it cost is always going to be part of a deciding factor when it comes to making a decision in business. And free always sounds good but usual comes with some type of string attached. In this paper I will discuss what are open and closed source operating systems (better known as OS) and how
Words: 585 - Pages: 3
examples for proving inferiority and inadequacy of proprietary software (i.e. programs with closed-source) (Sharma, Sugumaran, & Rajagopalan, 2002). Open Source is a method of programs’ development and licensing, in which everyone is entitled to a free application use or sale, a free modification (keeping the information about the authors of the programs’ in the code), a free publication of personal improvements and free access to programs’ source code (Mockus, Fielding, & Herbsleb
Words: 387 - Pages: 2
mainly due to the relative newness of the phenomena. This paper aims at giving a contribution to the ongoing discussion about open source business implications. The research hypothesis is that open source represents a disruptive innovation for the software industry. The purpose is to understand, through case study research, how open source companies can develop successful business models. Funambol provides an interesting example of an optimized business model, able to leverage the open source advantage
Words: 3853 - Pages: 16
Free and Open Source Software (FOSS), by 2006, had allegedly violated 235 patents that Microsoft was in possession of, including the Linux Kernal, Samba, OpenOffice.org, and others. Three contracts were struck up between Novell and Microsoft, most notably, a patent agreement that stated, “Don’t sue us and we won’t sue you.” When this happened, some dire consequences were predicted for FOSS, however, it hasn’t exactly gone as predicted. FOSS has blossomed since then. It is my opinion, that in entering
Words: 644 - Pages: 3
