2.0 Exceptions Generally, where a buyer agreed to pay more than the subject-matter is worth, the buyer cannot recover substantial damages in respect merely of the non-conformity of the goods delivered to him if those goods are worth no less than they would have been, if he had been in conformity with the contract. Under the common law, damages are generally irrecoverable for the loss of reputation and credibility. However under certain circumstances, damages for loss of reputation may be granted
Words: 1479 - Pages: 6
was seeking damages for the incident. In this particular case, Leach would be the plaintiff and Charlotte would be the defendant. Leach can file a suit claiming that Charlotte committed a tort, for doing a wrong and Leach was seeking compensation for the damages caused to him and his car. Charlotte committed the tort of negligence, because she caused someone injury. Because she was driving and at a stop sign searching for her phone, she did not notice the light turn green, therefore the car coming from
Words: 1896 - Pages: 8
Under the liability exclusions of Carleen’s policy, a preclusion of coverage is provided for: “[b]odily injury or property damage arising out of the rendering of or the failure to render professional services.” Notably, the term ‘professional services’ is not defined under the Policy. Maryland’s intermediate appellate court, in Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Miller, 130 Md. App. 373 (1998), in the context of its review of a declaratory judgment action, had occasion to review what constituted ‘professional
Words: 1194 - Pages: 5
LAWS 310 Entire Course The Legal Environment DeVry Purchase here https://sellfy.com/p/NAvv/ Product Description LAWS 310 Entire Course The Legal Environment DeVry LAWS 310 Heart of Atlanta Motel Homework Week 1 DeVry LAWS 310 Quiz Week 2 DeVry LAWS 310 You Decide What is Business Formation? Week 3 DeVry LAWS 310 Quiz Week 4 DeVry LAWS 310 You Decide Week 5 DeVry LAWS 310 Quiz Week 6 DeVry LAWS 310 You Decide Week 7 DeVry LAWS 310 Discussions Week 1-7 All Students Posts
Words: 855 - Pages: 4
The Ontario Court of Appeal has determined that an illegal act needs to be serious in order to warrant an eviction, since there is no remedy provision provided for Section 61(1) of the Residential Tenancy Act 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17. In regards to whether an illegal act under the Residential Tenancy Act 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17 can be municipal, federal, or provincial, the Board looked at Guideline 9, which states “The term "illegal" is not defined in the RTA but would include a serious violation of
Words: 300 - Pages: 2
Beverley Kite Flyers Corporation (BKFC) v Ming-Lee 1. Does the BKFC owe a duty to prevent physical injuries of a concussion, a broken arm and serious leg injuries leading to a leg amputation, to Ming-Lee? To establish physical injury, it must be reasonably foreseeable the BKFC’s omission in failing to cancel the event, despite weather warnings and advise from their legal advisor, led to Ming-Lee’s physical injuries. While it is arguable the Japanese kite flyers released their kites, causing them
Words: 925 - Pages: 4
In the case of California and Hawaiian Sugar Company v. Sun Ship, Inc., 794 F.2d 1433, Web 1986 U.S. App. Lexis 27376 (1986), it was concluded Sun Ship Inc. was in violation of its contract with California and Hawaiian Sugar Company (C&H) and ought to compensate the agreed amount detailed in the liquidated damages clause. C&H contracted Sun Ship to build a ship and be delivered upon an agreed date. Sun Ship did not meet the suspense that was outlined in the contract with C&H and drove them to pursue
Words: 441 - Pages: 2
Plaintiff Ted Pauly purchased several beers and mixed drinks at the Houlihan’s Restaurant in Brick, New Jersey. However, the prices of these stuffs were not listed but still offered on the menu. After receiving the check from restaurant, Pauly had to pay it in full price. As a result, he complained that the prices were unreasonable high and proposed a class action for breaching the contract and unjust enrichment against Houlihan’s Restaurants. In term of breaching of contract, Defendant assumes that
Words: 637 - Pages: 3
Holding: No, the trial court did not err in concluding that the defendant satisfied all four elements in being held liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. Rule(s): Restatement of Torts § 339 (Am. Law Inst. 1934). (1) The place where the condition is maintained is one upon which the possessor knows or should know that such children are liable to trespass, and; (2) The condition is one of which the possessor knows or should know which
Words: 493 - Pages: 2
Being that an intentional tort means that someone intended on committing harm in some way, it could easily be seen in the health field in my opinion. WHile there are ways to cover up many times it does come down to a patient knowing that one intended harm. It could be seen as an orderly who roughly handles a patient or even a nurse knowing that she intended to overdose a patient. Many times it could easily come in the form of a doctor refusing to treat a patient the way they want to be treated. I
Words: 603 - Pages: 3
