purahce price of can if you are not making it. This will tell us cost savings n Make vs Buy. So Annual Saving by Making the cans is $84702. 4. NPV iusing excel function is NPV(12%, -200000,84702,84702,84702,84702,136702) = $155,883.25 5. IRR using excel is IRR(-200000,84702,84702,84702,84702,136702) = 37.54% 6. Payback period:Payback period is the time required for cumulative cash inflows to recover the cash outflows of the project. Payback period = Year before full recovery + (Unrecovered cost
Words: 356 - Pages: 2
ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET DECEMBER SUBMISSION Unit Number and TitleAssessment TitleCourse TitleAssessment Code | Unit 6: Business Decision Making – Level 5Business Decision MakingHND Business HNDBUS-Unit 6/Business Decision Making/Oct2013 | Hand Out Date | 11th October 2013 | Hand In Date | 21st December 2013 | Lecturer(s) | Mohit Pun Dhan ChooramunGidraph Michuki | Internal Verifier | Jonathan Cartmell | Sources of information | 1. Course notes / Slides / Activities / Handouts 2. Recommended
Words: 4679 - Pages: 19
1) The dual-track process used by Ford to initiate “consideration of strategic alternatives” affects the bidding process for Hertz by giving Hertz another plan of attack if other viable sale opportunities fall through. By obtaining an IPO price as a base for the value of the company, Ford’s strategy would give Hertz other options to retrieve necessary capital, thus reducing the amount of risk. This strategy would then give Hertz a base bid that would be either equal to or above the amount of what
Words: 807 - Pages: 4
ranking methods are better? Why? Different quantitative methods are * Net Present Value * Internal rate of return * Payback period * Discounted payback period * Profitability Index NPV: IRR: 1) Project Ranking based on IRR: | | | | | Rank | Project No | IRR | 1 | 7 | 15% | 2 | 4 | 12.33% | 3 | 8 | 11.41% | 4 | 3 | 11.33% | 5 | 5 | 11.12% | 6 | 1 | 10.87% | 7 | 6 | 10% | 8 | 2 | 6.31% | Payback Period: 1) Project Ranking based on Pay Back Period:
Words: 442 - Pages: 2
CORPORATE FINANCE T H IRD E DIT ION JONATHAN BERK STANFORD UNIVERSITY PETER D E MARZO STANFORD UNIVERSITY Boston Columbus Indianapolis New York San Francisco Upper Saddle River Amsterdam Cape Town Dubai London Madrid Milan Munich Paris Montreal Toronto Delhi Mexico City Sao Paulo Sydney Hong Kong Seoul Singapore Taipei Tokyo To Rebecca, Natasha, and Hannah, for the love and for being there —J. B. To Kaui, Pono, Koa, and Kai, for all the love and laughter —P. D. Editor in Chief:
Words: 129593 - Pages: 519
accept/reject criterion for each. Which one is “best,” and why is it best? 2. Evaluate the capital-budgeting criteria of Euroland Foods on page 326. Their “Minimum Acceptable IRR” criterion is wrong. Why? Also, why is their criteria not a complete set of criteria with which to evaluate projects? 3. Evaluate the “Minimum Acceptable IRR” returns that Euroland uses for different types of projects. (See page 326.) When, if ever, should these returns be used as the hurdle rate instead of WACC? 4. Evaluate
Words: 393 - Pages: 2
The task is to evaluate the 7E7 project against a financial standard, the investors’ required returns. The case gives internal rates of return (IRR) for the 7E7 project under base-case and alternative forecasts. We must estimate a weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) for Boeing’s commercial-aircraft business segment in order to evaluate the IRRs. As a result of that analysis, we will identify the key value drivers and distinguish, on a qualitative basis, the key gambles that Boeing is making
Words: 448 - Pages: 2
Q.No. | Question | Options | Answer | 1. | The theoretically logical and operationally feasible normative goal for guiding financial decision making is | 1. | profit maximization | 2 | | | 2. | wealth maximization | | | | 3. | dividend maximization | | | | 4. | sales maximization | | | | 5. | - | | 1. | Your company has received a $50,000 loan from an industrial finance company. The annual payments are $6,202.70. If the company is paying 9% interest per
Words: 10936 - Pages: 44
1 Mathematics for Management Concept Summary Algebra Solving Linear Equations in One Variable Manipulate the equation using Rule 1 so that all the terms involving the variable (call it x) are on one side of the equation and all constants are on the other side. Then use Rule 2 to solve for x. Rule 1: Adding the same quantity to both sides of an equation does not change the set of solutions to that equation. Rule 2: Multiplying or dividing both sides of an equation by the same nonzero number
Words: 3181 - Pages: 13
Guillermo Furniture Store Analysis Olakunle Corporate Finance/FIN 571 August 15, 2011 Introduction The Guillermo Furniture Store is the largest manufacturer of furniture in Mexico, and it has made furniture of different types for several years. Until the late 1990s, when Guillermo’s competitor started carting away some of its businesses thereby affecting its revenue, the business had thrived very well in the sales of furniture. The new competition has latest state-of-the art manufacturing
Words: 1942 - Pages: 8
