Guam Unified Court System Research Paper for Judicial Process Instructor: Doctor Elberg By Donna Halbrook Guam Unified Court System The Judiciary of Guam is pleased to join the United States of America as the fifty-first state. The newest chapter of our judiciary journey begins with some major objectives in mind. One of these objectives is to increase access to justice for every member of our community. Another major objective is to ensure the Judiciary serves as a model of good governance
Words: 5605 - Pages: 23
authority in superior public cases and in which government judges administrated on centralized decrees. Additionally, the Supreme Court justices were obligatory to function on the U.S. circuit judges. The cause for this was to ensure that adjudicators from the uppermost court will be associated with the prime trial law court study about the processes of the state court of law. Additionally, in the primary years of the Supreme Court, the judges had diminutive regulation over which cases they got. Until
Words: 557 - Pages: 3
recuse themselves before any corruption occurs. Judges and lawyers are faced with a number of ethical dilemmas on a regular basis, however not every ethical dilemma requires judicial disqualification. It is important that lawyers and judges follow their ethical obligation in order to uphold the law and ensure proper representation to their clients. Improper representation not only create a number of problems for clients, but also for the lawyer or judge themselves. For example, when a lawyer puts their
Words: 1395 - Pages: 6
the overall “culture” of the Court in regards to the judge and the two attorneys present for each case. In total I saw seven court cases presented before Judge Killilea. In television shows criminal procedures are long and rigorous. There is a lot that takes place between the arrest of the criminal and the court debates that last for hours or even days to determine
Words: 778 - Pages: 4
Dworkin setting out to criticize or explore? Ronald Dworkin sets out to criticize and explore the theory about adjudication that judges are employed by the law. This theory embodies the idea that adjudicators implement legal statutes and the common law, but do not give input to its substance. Furthermore, that legislation is more highly regarded than the opinions of judges, despite theories of judgment being more refined. 2. What is the distinction between arguments of principle and arguments
Words: 654 - Pages: 3
between the existing law and the law ought to be. It goes on to analyze different models of judicial law making like the interpretation, Article 142, in the absence of codified law to the new concept of Public Interest Litigation and Appointment of Judges . It also discusses the basic attributes that have undergone a change. It ends with the authors providing their views that a mean has to be found between too much and too little activism. INTRODUCTION I believe that we must do away with 'the childish
Words: 3259 - Pages: 14
Once a person has either pleaded guilty or has been found guilty of a crime a judge must determine a sentence that they must receive. Sentencing is imposing a criminal sanction by a judicial authority. Each year there are thousands of criminals that appear before a judge or judges to be sentenced for their crimes committed. Sentencing descriptions are primarily for felony offenses, or those that are punishable by less than one year of incarceration. Mandatory minimum sentences, three strikes laws
Words: 353 - Pages: 2
prosecutors, defense attorneys, witnesses, victims, defendants, and judges all play an instrumental role during the court process. In addition to these key roles, the courtroom clerk and reporter are administrative roles that allow the court rooms daily operations to run smoothly and keep a record of the preceding. Understanding that it takes these roles to work as a team all playing their part to accomplish the objective. The judge is the main authority in a courtroom. They are appointed differently
Words: 1108 - Pages: 5
made in the image of God. No matter the profession, we are to always represent ourselves as Christians. Because we are made in the image of God, as a lawyer, I should never compromise my morale for what's right in the legal eye, and also to never judge someone based on their past. Since mankind is made in the image of God, as a lawyer, I should never allow my moral principles to be overruled by legal principles. I should always uphold God's law above man's law no matter the consequences. Many attorneys
Words: 692 - Pages: 3
the Judge, bailiff, the prosecutor, the attorney, the jurors, the court clerk, and transcriber. The judge is the one that everyone has to report to and he/she will be the one that determines the outcome of the case. When you address the judge you cannot call them by the first name or last name you must at times say “Your honor”. In many parts of the world they are sometimes called “My lord” or “My lady”. He/she is the one who presides over the proceedings of his/her court room. The judge sits
Words: 414 - Pages: 2
