According to Unlocking English Legal System, “purposive approach goes beyond the mischief rule in that the court is not just looking to see what the gap was in the old law”, which means the court has to consider the consistencies between the statute and the cases. Apart from this, the court has to consider the intention when the Parliament created the Act. Purposive approach is another way for the Lords to interpret statute. In the case of R. v for Health ex parte Quintavalle shows the use of
Words: 627 - Pages: 3
Consider the scenario where you have been a witness to a physical hit-and-run assault that occurred across from your home. The police immediately arrive on the scene and begin to ask questions about the details of the unlawful attack. Once at court, you observe this case where the defendant is on trial for the assault. A friend of the defendant is called to the witness stand to provide his version of what happened. The friend commits perjury, or intentionally lying under oath to mislead the court
Words: 1652 - Pages: 7
Burden of proof: described as a fact that is legal established in order to get a party's point across 1) Discuss the differences in burden of proof under criminal and civil law. Criminal law: The Burden of Production: The burden of proving the defendant's guilt is up to the prosecution, and they must establish the fact beyond a reasonable doubt. A prosecution is the attorney charging against the person committing the crime. Reasonable doubt is making sure that the prosecutor has no lack of evidence
Words: 406 - Pages: 2
Taking advantage of my situation, I had come across Drebber, heavily intoxicated by liquor as he got in the cab hastily to escape a fight, and I had to do what he deserved. I offered him two pills as a choice - one was harmless while the other was extremely poisonous and toxic, and he chose poison. Alas, it was a matter of time before justice was served. In his final moments, I showed him the wedding ring from Lucy’s finger, to remind him of the pain and suffering he had inflicted on her in her
Words: 334 - Pages: 2
People vs. Latham Appellate should he not given another chance. For he is obviously guilty. Appellate should not be given another for he is obviously guilty and there is evidence to prove that he is guilty. For example his finger prints were found at the sight of the crime. He has said that the owners niece has let him in the house but she does not know him and she did not have access to the house as well. He has also stated that he was helping the owner move when confronted by Hernandez. But again
Words: 284 - Pages: 2
I have been given the task of identifying and describing a court case. Along with the identification of a court case, I have also been tasked out to determine if the court case supports judicial activism or judicial restraint. I am going to be providing information on the case that is in regards to HEIEN v. NORTH CAROLINA. On the morning of April 29th, 2009, Sergeant Matt Darisse of the Surry Country Sheriff's Department sat in his patrol car in Dobson, North Carolina. Officer Darisse was observing
Words: 1451 - Pages: 6
Competency to stand trial and amnesia After reading Dr. Smith and Dr. Resnick’s article “Amnesia and Competence to Stand Trial,” the thing I was most surprised by how preposterous Mr. Andrew’s claim was, that his lawyer supported it, and the fact that the case had to go all the way to the US Court of Appeals. Mr. Andrews was a known bank robber and a user of illicit drugs. When he was accused of another bank robbery based off of DNA evidence, he claimed his heroine and alcohol abuse made him unaware
Words: 287 - Pages: 2
Image a young boy out on the streets.That young boy decides to steal from a nearby store.He gets caught but what now? Should this young boy go to jail or go to Circle Justice? Some people will say that he should go to jail while others say he shouldn’t. If the boy went to jail he would have to serve his trum in there and at a young age that is not good. The American Justice System is not fair because the result of jail can lead to dangerous things,schools are changing, and how people change in Circle
Words: 712 - Pages: 3
Ralph’s Grocery and United Food and Commercial Workers Union The case that I chose for the week 6 critical thinking assignment concerns Ralph’s Grocery Company, located in California. It applies to this week’s material due to the fact that the case involves unlawful suspension and discharge of an employee, as reviewed by the National Labor Relations Board. Background In May 2011, Vittorio Razi was an employee at Ralph’s Grocery and was suspended and terminated after he refused to take a drug test
Words: 750 - Pages: 3
Law Enforcement did not have probable cause to arrest Terry Ray Ayers. Furthermore, there were no exigent circumstances to utilize a tactical squad and arrest Ayers in a dramatic fashion that put his fiancée and three small children in danger. “A false arrest is a violation of the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizure of persons” (Newman, 2006). The identification of Ayers by a witness through the use of a photo lineup is not enough evidence to arrest him. “Eyewitness misidentification
Words: 310 - Pages: 2
