Phoenix Disorderly Conduct Defense Lawyer Committed to Protecting Your Rights Choose a top-rated defense attorney when you are charged with disorderly conduct. Arja Shaw is passionate about the law and protecting the rights of her clients. She is driven to preserve and protect the constitutional rights of anyone who’s charged with a crime. The Shaw Law Firm has a proven track record of success. When you need an attorney who will fight for your rights inside the courtroom and out, you need to call
Words: 537 - Pages: 3
In the case of Horgan v. Simmons, Kenneth Horgan the plaintiff sued his employer/Supervisor Timothy Simmons for discriminating against him because of his HIV status. Horgan was working as a sales manager for Morgan Services in February 2001. Horgan knew of his HIV status for about ten years, but only his close friends were aware of his situation. He was promoted to general manager of Morgan Services Facility located in Chicago In January 2008 which is where he worked under the company’s president
Words: 676 - Pages: 3
Summary of Facts The plaintiff, Willy Ferrucci, is suing the defendant, Dominique Douaola, for payment of studio and production time for his new album. Mr. Ferrucci commented he left a message on the defendant’s answering machine about the available dates and charges for the studio time. However, Mr. Douaola confirmed the dates with the plaintiff but never mentioned the charges. Additionally, the defendant continued by stating he had performed numerous times for the plaintiff for no charge and believed
Words: 436 - Pages: 2
The legal office of Tyson, Edison & Vogue, the Brockton Liberty Building, 501 West Tenth Street, Starville, Brockton 00012-4532, Mr. Theodore Tyson, Esq., has been appointed to represent Lauren and James Mosley, the plaintiffs in the Mosley v. OkeeDokee–Weight, Inc. case. After reviewing the case the law offices of Tyson, Edison, & Vogue believe the jury’s verdict for the award of $200,000 based on the evidence of other people who took the natural dietary supplement was an appropriate decision
Words: 519 - Pages: 3
Tyler Clementi Case - What Punishment Is Justifiable? Monday, Apr. 2, 2012 You've probably heard about the case of Tyler Clementi - a freshman at Rutgers University who committed suicide after his roommate, 18-year-old Dharun Ravi, secretly filmed and broadcasted Tyler having a homosexual encounter with another man. Three days later, Tyler committed suicide. Now, convicted of invasion of privacy, bias intimidation, witness tampering, and hindering arrest, Dharun faces 10 years in jail or deportation
Words: 442 - Pages: 2
Thomas M. Fields was indicted in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia in 1905, for embezzlement. He was facing eight counts in the indictment, but seven were removed by demurrer or by verdict in favor of the defendant. His trial, begun on May 8, and ended on May 15, 1905, he was found guilty by the third court. This case involves a federal death sentence that was imposed on Thomas M. Fields for committing a federal capital offense. Thomas M. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the
Words: 289 - Pages: 2
Vincent Messina William Cail CJL3510 March 3, 2017 Facts- Two men were arrested for being suspects in the murder of an elderly couple. These men were Silas Manning and Willie Barker. The court thought that they had a stronger case against Manning so they would try him first so that he could then testify against Barker. However, there were many issues with Manning’s trial and after four years and six trials the court finally convicted Manning of both murders. While this was happening, they requested
Words: 292 - Pages: 2
Chimel v. California Misty Basford Kaplan University Chimel v. California Case summary: Police officers went to a suspect’s home to serve an arrest warrant. The suspect was not home, the wife allowed them into the home while they waited for the suspect to return. When the suspect returned, they served him with the arrest warrant and requested to search the house. The suspect declined but the police did it anyhow. The court found that police could not search the entire home without a search warrant
Words: 310 - Pages: 2
Stonerose arguments prevail here and Jordan could have probably foreseen such a ban. The court will probably follow the same analogy as Brooks in deciding that the ban was foreseeable because it was due to conditions normally to be expected. Further, Jordan’s argument that entering into the lease proves his un-foreseeability is invalid. And if the court submitted itself to its subjective test, there would be no place to avert the application of any force majeure provision. Since all what it would
Words: 700 - Pages: 3
The case of Carl Bryan v McPherson was a unique case where on Sunday Bryan was beginning to have a bad day. Bryan was going to drive his brother back to his mother’s house in Coronado, but he was upset that he had to drive to Los Angeles to pick up his keys that his cousin's girlfriend picked up by mistake. While driving to Los Angeles in boxers and a t-shirt Bryan received a speeding ticket which made him agitated. After Bryan retrieved his keys, he and his brother were headed to his mother's house
Words: 449 - Pages: 2
