Jury Nullification

Page 41 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Free Essay

    Criminal Cases

    For my court observation, I chose to watch the Casey Anthony trial that started on May 24, 2011 and concluded on July 5, 2011. This was a long trial because of the amount of evidence admitted (over 400 pieces) and the large number of witnesses called to testify for both the prosecution and the defense. I am pretty sure everyone knew something about this case, but what I witnessed watching the actual trial was appalling, to say the least. This case tugged at my heart because a mother, Casey Anthony

    Words: 909 - Pages: 4

  • Premium Essay

    Hello

    DIANE GERINGER, individually, and as parent and next best friend of TARA GERINGER, and as surviving spouse of William Geringer, decedent, and mother of Jared Geringer, decedent, Plaintiff(s), v. WILDHORN RANCH, INC., a Colorado Corporation, M. R. WATTERS and LES BRETZKE, Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 706 F. Supp. 1442 December 14, 1988 (with professor edits) OPINION  SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE  Plaintiff Diane

    Words: 1803 - Pages: 8

  • Free Essay

    None

    Opinion Three scenarios for Kenya's ICC trials The outcome of the ICC case on the electoral violence in Kenya can have important consequences. Last updated: 23 Feb 2014 09:11 Abdullahi Boru Halakhe Abdullahi Boru Halakhe Abdullahi Boru Halakhe is a Horn of Africa security analyst. RSS E-mail Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker Email Article Print Article Share article Send Feedback An ICC verdict might damage the alliance between William Ruto and Uhuru Kenyatta, writes Halakhe

    Words: 1544 - Pages: 7

  • Premium Essay

    Adjudication Process

    The juvenile court system has the option to transfer a case to criminal court rather than a juvenile court based upon age and crime. There are three different categories for the transfer. The first type of waiver is a judcial waiver; this waiver allows the juvenile judge to transfer the case. The second is a concurrent jurisdiction is a situation where both juvenile and criminal courts have jurisdiction over the case. The last waiver is statutory exclusion where the state mandates that certain crimes

    Words: 376 - Pages: 2

  • Premium Essay

    Christopher Pittman Verdict Opinion

    Opinion over Christopher Pittman’s Adult Trial Verdict Name Professor Institution Date Just to quote Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. words, “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”. Human beings are not entirely fit. Thus judges just like any other human being are bound to make mistakes in dispensing justice. However, Judges are obliged to be ever watchful and mindful in their endeavors of delivering justice. Every day, all over US judges dispense justice to convicted persons and

    Words: 1829 - Pages: 8

  • Free Essay

    Case Brief Levi. V. Abercrombie

    California after learning that Abercrombie was selling products with this mirror image on a line of jeans- the “Ruehl”. The district court held a jury trial in December of 2008. The defendants argued that their line of jeans and Levi Strauss products were sold in different channels and at such different prices as to which they could not cause any harm to Strauss. The Jury returned a verdict that Abercrombie’s Ruehl-line uses of its mirror-image design did not infringe the Arcuate mark. In 2009, the district

    Words: 610 - Pages: 3

  • Free Essay

    Alger Hiss Trial

    accusations against Hiss. For over nine years, beginning September 1, 1939, he had claimed to have quit the Party in 1937. Chambers now began to claim the actual date was sometime in early March 1938, the year of the "Baltimore documents. Trial: The grand jury charged Hiss with two counts of perjury

    Words: 637 - Pages: 3

  • Free Essay

    12 Angry Men

    The Art of Persuasion By Eric Pratt English 1010 Eric Pratt English 1010 Tues, Thurs 09/28/2010 The Art of Persuasion The film “Twelve Angry Men” is a good resource when analyzing methods of persuasion. In this film a jury meets together to give the verdict of a murder trial. With the evidence presented in court there was no reasonable doubt among the jurors, except one, that the young man on trial killed his father. It was juror number 8, also known as Davis, who was hesitant at putting

    Words: 1226 - Pages: 5

  • Premium Essay

    Business Law Cases

    indicted with more than 25 counts of securities fraud. The government felt that Skilling benefited “profited from the fraudulent scheme” at the time of trial. According to 1346, Skilling did not commit honest-services fraud. Federal district court jury found Skilling guilty of 19 counts including the honest-services-fraud charge and sentenced him to 292 months in prison and ordered him to pay $45 million. U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. The Supreme Court granted Skilling’s request

    Words: 1024 - Pages: 5

  • Free Essay

    Ethics

    Three Primary Schools of Ethics Rule-Based School of Ethics In this case, the court passed the verdict in favor of the biological parents using the rule-based theory. The rule-based theory implies that decisions are based on rules and duties. The principles you believe should govern the outcomes. Individual who would agree with the rule-based theory would say that the biological parents have the right over the child. It is the duty of the biological parents to take care of their child and so the

    Words: 651 - Pages: 3

Page   1 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 50