Statement of the Facts: In pursuant of information, three Cleveland police officers came to Miss Mapp’s (“petitioner”) house. The officers had been informed that a person who was wanted for questioning regarding a connection with a recent bombing was hiding in the house and also that there was large amount paraphernalia being hidden in that house. Upon their arrival, the officers knocked on the door and asked to let them in the house. The petitioner, after calling her attorney, refused to let them
Words: 850 - Pages: 4
D. The district court correctly held that three evidence of actual confusion that Lamborghini presented are insufficient to prove likelihood of confusion. This Court should affirm the district court’s summary judgment to AEV because Lamborghini only presented isolated instances of confusion, which negates likelihood of confusion. The evidence of actual confusion is the “most important factor in assessing a likelihood of confusion.” Gen. Motors, 453 F.3d at 356. In analyzing the evidence of actual
Words: 1019 - Pages: 5
This study will be about “Are Supreme Court Justice influenced by the public opinion in decision making. Do Appeals Court Justice make their decision based on public opinion? This question is one that will be an ongoing topic. Many scholars continue to debate whether the justices, and thus the courts outputs, actually respond to the public preference (Mishler and Sheehan, 1996). Common people wonder if the Appeals Court Justices will decide the verdict of a case based on others opinion or if the
Words: 477 - Pages: 2
1. Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF Document 1) lists no time frames or dates for any of the allegations raised and limited information to ascertain his alleged injuries. Additionally, aside from naming wardens of North Branch Correctional Institution (“NBCI”), he fails to identify the names, ranks or descriptions of any of the individuals he asserts were direct participants of the incidents. Plaintiff alleges a myriad of allegations; however, undersigned counsel believes that the following represent
Words: 371 - Pages: 2
The purpose of a CLETS Temporary Restraining Order, against a party accused to be the abuser, like any restraining order it is done for the purpose to make or help the abuser to stop the form of abuse that is being inflicted upon another person. Courts have guidelines that they do require, to be followed when issuing one of these orders. The purpose of a CLETS order is when evidencie is shown that violence and abuse is of a more serious criminal nature has occurred and still is occurring, then the
Words: 1051 - Pages: 5
circumstances. PLF's brief, which was filed in support of neither party to address the complicated duty issues, was cited in the majority opinion. Initially, smith was awarded $2.874 million, but he will receive approximately $1.48 million because the jury determined Smith was 49 percent at fault for his injuries. Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson and Justices Harriet O’Neill, David Medina, Paul Green and Eva Guzman also upheld the jury’s decision. Justices Phil Johnson, Dale Wainwright and Nathan Hecht
Words: 486 - Pages: 2
The Case of Crocker v. Pleasant Ashley H. O’Dell MTS 120 Mortuary Law Carl Sandburg College The case of John Crocker vs. Richard Pleasant is about a family suing West Palm Beach Office Richard Pleasant, The City of West Palm Beach, West Palm Beach. The case was heard by Circuit Judge Moses Baker of West Palm Beach. The case goes as follows….Jay Crocker’s body was found on fire by rescue workers in an alley in West Palm Beach on December 5, 1995. He remained unidentified for three days when
Words: 1789 - Pages: 8
acquitted without any punishment at all. But what many of the viewers of the trail, including the jury, saw to be the most important and effective part of the hearing was Adams’s closing argument. He begins his case with a quote of the “rights of mankind”, and then proceeds through his speech with heightened uses of hyperbole. Adams also includes multiple uses of rhetorical questions to place the viewers and the jury in the position of the soldiers, and uses personification to emphasize the necessary consideration
Words: 997 - Pages: 4
Imagine: you’re a part of the jury in a court-case involving the accusation of a man murdering his own father. What is the first thing one would look at to prove the case guilty or not guilty? Starting at the very basics, evidence is by far the most important attribute of a case. Evidence of motives, intentions, actions, confessions and other vocalizations hold the most effective and win-worthy arguments. These components are like a concoction, with the right amount of each, it creates the perfect
Words: 803 - Pages: 4
12 Angry Men Separate Paragraphs Juror #3, is a strongly opinionated man who is extremely intolerant of other people's views and opinions, he obstructs the jury system. He is “accustomed to forcing his wishes and views upon others” through the use of strong words and force (1). While talking to juror #12, juror #3 decides to play tic-tac-toe during the trial and says “Your turn. We might as well pass the time” (13). The utter fact that juror #3 had the audacity to play a game during a life or death
Words: 867 - Pages: 4
