Margreiter V Hotel Monteleone

Page 1 of 1 - About 2 Essays
  • Premium Essay

    640 F. 2d 508 - Margreiter V. New Hotel Monteleone Inc

    640 F. 2d 508 - Margreiter v. New Hotel Monteleone Inc Home640 f2d 508 margreiter v. new hotel monteleone inc 640 F2d 508 Margreiter v. New Hotel Monteleone Inc 640 F.2d 508 Douglas T. MARGREITER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW HOTEL MONTELEONE, INC. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants. No. 79-3149. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit A Jan. 19, 1981. Christovich & Kearney, A. R. Christovich, Jr., Steven M. Lozes, New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellants

    Words: 1547 - Pages: 7

  • Premium Essay

    Negligence

    The five elements of negligence that apply to the case of Mr. Margrieter V. New Hotel Monteleone, Inc are Duty, breach, cause in effect, proximal cause and harm (damage suffered as a proximal result of the defendant’s breach of duty). Duty refers to an obligation one has to another party. If duty “constrains and channels behavior in a socially responsible way” (Owen, 2007), then the Hotel Menteloene has a duty to take reasonable measures to protect its guests from harm. Breach, an improper

    Words: 852 - Pages: 4

Previous
Page   1
Next