men's basketball tournament agreement with CBS and Turner is worth an average of more than $770 million per year, and the current Bowl Championship Series television deal – money that goes to conferences and then is distributed to schools, with no NCAA involvement – is worth $180 million per year. The new college football playoff, which starts in the 2014 season, will be worth about $470 million annually to the conferences.” (Cohen & Russo, 2013) This is money that is created through the blood
Words: 2287 - Pages: 10
and Cons of Compensation for NCAA Division I Student Athletes Mark Dunkley PEP 461 Student The College at Brockport Abstract This paper weighs in the pros and cons for the compensation of Division I college student athletes. This paper also introduces a plan that would allow monetary compensation of college athletes in the United States. A survey was distributed to 14 males of the Suny College at Brockport basketball team Pros and Cons of Compensation for NCAA Division I Student Athletes
Words: 2163 - Pages: 9
at or below the national poverty level, due to NCAA restrictions. Students living in poverty level while their fair market value averages $265,000 annually, not including income from individual commercial endorsement deals. Students living in poverty while their coach makes an average of $3.5 million per year. Students living in poverty allowing for tax payers to fund food stamps and welfare benefits while their multi-million dollar income
Words: 688 - Pages: 3
College athletics have gained immeasurable amounts of popularity among Americans over the past few decades. This has produced increased annual revenue for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (also know as the NCAA) and the participating colleges which has driven the dispute of whether college athletes should or shouldn’t be compensated beyond their athletic scholarship. This paper will endeavor to answer the question as to whether or not college athletes should be compensated for, by explaining
Words: 1444 - Pages: 6
Against the NCAA” Joe Nocera and Ben Strauss quote a wide range of economists and attorneys who agree that the NCAA functions as an economic cartel by colluding to artificially suppress wages for workers. In 2014, football players at Northwestern University organized a strike to illuminate the fact that they regularly worked more than 50 hours per week for their school’s athletic department.
Words: 1334 - Pages: 6
abundance of support for and against compensation. There are many flaws in the system concerning the concept of athlete compensation. When considering whether or not to pay college athletes, one must look at where the money would come from, how the NCAA is treating athletes, and if college athletes are primarily students. Understandably, the money’s source is a sizable concern when contemplating the possible payment of college athletes. Allen Sack does not spend much time focused on this in his
Words: 653 - Pages: 3
evolution of technology is has become a business for television companies. Major television networks like ESPN, Fox, CBS Sports, and Turner Broadcasting Systems have made college athletics a profit machine. Each company sign big contracts with the NCAA and each conference to gain the rights to broadcast the athletic events of the institutions. The conference then distribute that money evenly through its’ members. For the television networks, The “Big Five” Conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12
Words: 1098 - Pages: 5
celebrated and highly anticipated. One of the most watched events, is the NCAA tournament called March Madness, which brings in about $900 million annually according to ESPN.com and also requires players to miss up to a month of classes. The
Words: 1237 - Pages: 5
Derek Layton Professor Bird EN 300 11/18/14 Are College Athletes Going to be Paid? The NCAA is one of the top organizations in the world that brings in billions of dollars in revenue on college athletics alone most notably with college football and college basketball. Yes some of these athletes do get compensated with some sort of scholarship which does help out with their expenses but the chances of an athlete receiving an athletic scholarship that is worth anything meaningful is less than
Words: 1492 - Pages: 6
the case. The NCAA should pay collegiate athletes because full-ride scholarships rarely pay for the full cost of attendance, the NCAA uses players' marketability to endorse their products, and with the immense amount of cash flowing through the ranks in collegiate sports, some of the money should go to the athletes. The rule in the official NCAA rule book
Words: 1707 - Pages: 7
