Courts are set up to provide every individual a fair trial. Consequently, they have rules to only allow admissible evidence into the courtroom. This means that trial court judges decide what evidence is fair to admit into a case. In published research, such as “Can the Jury Disregard That Information? The Use of Suspicion to Reduce the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity and Inadmissible Testimony” by Fein and Tomlinson, “When Instructions to Forget Become Instructions to Remember” by Golding
Words: 818 - Pages: 4
examine the situation and how to process the crime scene. There are steps we must take in solving the burglary and how it happened. In burglaries that occur we must find ways to see things form the view of the police and how they process the evidence. The evidence in a burglary varies do to what was taken or damaged in the process of the burglary. We must see things from the eyes of the police and try to help them in the best way we can with whatever information we have about a burglary that took place
Words: 1443 - Pages: 6
on the crime scene search, principles, crime scene photography, sketching the crime scene, fingerprint evidence, trace evidence, and biological evidence. Investigators have the responsibility to comprehend these segments in order to effectively manage and maintain a crime scene. The crime scene investigation consists of elements of criminal law, criminal procedure, and constitutional evidence. The search part of the crime scene involves a related focus which is in legal requirements. It is crucial
Words: 772 - Pages: 4
under the microscope, divulging into the many aspects and rules of an expert witness and the opinion they give. A In the Criminal Procedure Rule, it terms an expert witness a person who is required to give expert evidence for the purpose of criminal proceedings, including evidence that is to determine the fitness to plead or for the purpose of sentencing. For example one may call on a police officer that is experience in collision investigations may offer his expert opinion on how the accident
Words: 1570 - Pages: 7
Then they had to bring in experts in ground water movement, they had to prove chemicals were dumped, and had to prove the chemicals made the people sick. Proving of causation was the reason why so many experts were called on. Every aspect of the evidence had to be proven to be as solid as possible to be allowed in court. 3. Hydrogeologist, Geologist, Engineering Geologist, Soil scientists, Geochemist 4. The first issue is money. Experts are paid for their time and even though it creates
Words: 577 - Pages: 3
Introduction The High Court’s decision in Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21 has been significant as the threshold requirements for the admissibility of expert evidence are clarified (French 2012). This essay will first discuss the facts of the case, followed by the technical requirements and perceived difficulties related to expert evidence identified by the court in this case. Facts Mr Hawchar, the respondent claimed damages from his employer, Dasreef Pty Ltd, the appellant as he was diagnosed
Words: 1116 - Pages: 5
EVIDENCE ACT, 2011 EXPLANATORY M E M O R A N D U M This Act repeals the Evidence Act, Cap. E14, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, and enacts a new Evidence Act, 2011 w h i c h applies to all judicial proceedings in or before Courts in Nigeria. EVIDENCE ACT, 2011 ARRANGEMENT SECTION: I- GENERAL Evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant facts. Evidence in accordance with section I generally admissible. Admissibility of evidence under other legislation. PART JI- RELEVANCY Relevance
Words: 4122 - Pages: 17
Week 2 Thought Paper CJE4610 8/31/14 A case starts the moment the call is received. In many cases there is evidence or clues on the call itself. One of the things you can get from the call is a description of the incident, suspect information, and other various clues and information. Then when you get on scene your real investigation will begin. You may or may not have real life suspects or victims on scene. Once you get on scene you have to start processing information and the scene itself
Words: 885 - Pages: 4
the scientific community, they were not considered to be generally accepted (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (92-102), 509 U.S. 579 (1993). ). The Daubert standard was then combined with two other cases in Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. This is now referred to as the Daubert trilogy. The second in the trilogy is General Electric vs. Joiner, where Joiner sued the Georgia state court after being diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer. Joiner argued that his cancer was promoted
Words: 1482 - Pages: 6
Matter of Opinion I do not agree with the article and I would like to explain why. First let’s take a look at the statement “entitled to an opinion”, what does it mean to be entitled? Entitlement is simply staking claim, so when someone says they are “entitled to their opinion” what they are saying is they are claiming the opinion as theirs. We can assume this to be true because they have stated an opinion and now they are stating that the opinion is theirs, while this should be the end of the
Words: 731 - Pages: 3
