Mitt Obama is a drug analyst at Health Canada Headquarters in Mississauga Canada, as well as an expert witness on drug usage and consumption. He is considered one of the most prestigious Forensics Expert in the field with 20 years of experience. Mitt Obama is a crown witness and is trying to prove to the court that this amount is impossible for a single person to use, and that this could only be used for trafficking, because if someone did consume this much cocaine they would surely die. Examination
Words: 541 - Pages: 3
of Criminal Evidence Sigrid Hess June 3, 2013 Expert Witness Requirements This article will briefly review the applicable standards of the admission and exclusion of expert testimony in the Federal Court. The guidelines discussed in this article, principally pertain to the subject of the reliability of the methodology supporting the submitting of evidence. In addition, the qualifications of the proposed experts in the pertinent field of expertise, and the relevancy of evidence from expert’s
Words: 1817 - Pages: 8
proceeding fairly, eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay, and promote the development of evidence law, to the end of ascertaining the truth and securing a just determination. RULE 103. RULINGS ON EVIDENCE (a) Preserving a Claim of Error. A party may claim error in a ruling to admit or exclude evidence only if the error affects a substantial right of the party and: (1) if the ruling admits evidence, a party, on the record: (A) timely objects or moves to strike; and (B) states the specific
Words: 49736 - Pages: 199
would have been the parents. It was clear that someone who commit such a heinous crime would has some deep psychological issues. A crime like this was definitely from someone who knew the victim. As the lead investigator it was a clear case, the evidence was seen the victim's head was seen the corner of the street and the weapon that was used was in the families possessions. Looking for the knife would have been an essential part to the search. The case was solved 30 minutes after the police arrive
Words: 1311 - Pages: 6
interest as both their dogs have had an encounter with B so it might delight them to punish B . Thus C can’t be recognised as a neutral witness . Also the fact that A gets along with C isn’t sufficient evidence to suggest that A wouldn’t normally behave in such a bellicose manner. As a result this evidence doesn’t amount to relevant expertise. D has often walked with A assuming the owners are friends that would mean that D can’t be recognised as a neutral witness. D’s ability to perceive can be questioned
Words: 454 - Pages: 2
Contents Introduction 17 2.1 2.2 2.3 Relevance, weight and admissibility 18 Classification of evidence 20 Development and current objectives of evidence law 23 Introduction When you begin to study a new legal subject, you soon find that you come across words and expressions that you have not encountered before, or that you suspect are being used in a special way. This is especially so for evidence law. You need to understand the most important of these early on in order to get to grips with
Words: 4210 - Pages: 17
Mora v. Jackson Memorial Foundation, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, Florida (2010) FACTS - Josephine Mora, who was 62 at the time, worked for the Jackson Memorial Foundation Inc. as a fundraiser. She initially worked in a division where she conducted media relations and solicited donors but her immediate supervisor Mrs. Chea was not pleased with Mora’s work and recommended to the CEO Mr. Rodriguez that Mora be terminated. However, Mr. Rodriguez decided to give Plaintiff
Words: 467 - Pages: 2
building this case mainly on hearsay evidence which is typically barred so it was the first case of its kind in Illinois history (Curry, 2012). Made to fit Peterson’s case, “Drew’s Law” was passed to allow hearsay evidence under rare circumstances (Curry, 2012). This case became such a big deal that Lifetime made a movie about it (Curry, 2012). When looking at it, they were relying on statements made by his fourth wife Stacy along with many others as evidence (Curry, 2012). - Friend Kristin
Words: 562 - Pages: 3
Laws of Criminal Evidence Justice CJAD 405 24 January, 2016 Nuts and Bolts Assignment #2 Please answer any 2 of the questions 1-5 and any 3 of questions 6-10. You should have a total of 5 questions answered. Please submit your answers to the correct Dropbox folder by 8:00 pm Sunday. Please number your answers to correspond to the number of the applicable question. 1. Is the jury present when hearings on the admissibility of a confession are conducted? Cite the applicable rule that applies
Words: 900 - Pages: 4
Chapter 1Vocabulary terms - Computer Forensics • Chain-of-custody – The route the evidence takes from initial possession until final disposition. It is also called the chain-of-evidence. • Circumstantial evidence – Indirect evidence, usually a theory, that is supported by a significant quantity of corroborating evidence. • Computer forensic science – The science of acquiring, preserving, retrieving, and presenting data that has been processed electronically and stored on computer media. • Computer
Words: 372 - Pages: 2
