The majority of Circuit Courts have interpreted reasonable belief as a functional equivalent of probable cause with regards to entering into a dwelling. In Steagald, the court held that, absent exigent circumstances, a search warrant is required to enter a third party’s residence in order to search for a fugitive believed to be within. Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204, 222 (1981). This conclusion arose from the facts that officers entered into Steagald’s home looking for Ricky Lyons,
Words: 1478 - Pages: 6
Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summary David L. Clay CJA/315 February 8, 2016 Scott Horwath Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summary Manuel Celis-Acosta is accused to be the ring leader of the Fast and Furious Operation who helped organize the transfer and purchase of about 2,000 weapons to the Sinaloa Castel. He is also accused of providing the weapons used in the kill of border patrol agents Brian Terry. In April 2, 2010 Manuel was stopped by Phoenix Police and booked to
Words: 1105 - Pages: 5
Many law enforcement officers have been accused of illegal searches and seizing property for evidence illegally with no probable cause. That is unconstitutional according to the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment protectects the right of the people to be secure in their homes, cars, any personal belongings, and no warrant can be issued without probable cause. That means an officer can't just infiltrate your home because he thinks some drugs are inside. Him/Her will need sufficie
Words: 550 - Pages: 3
Differentiate between reasonable suspicion and probable cause. What does each allow a police officer to do? Probable cause is having enough evidence to convince a reasonable person that an illegal act has been committed. While reasonable suspicion is a level of evidence that a police officer needs in order to justify detaining a person for a criminal activity. So probable cause is a higher level of proof that reasonable suspicion. If the police do not have reasonable suspicion they cannot detain
Words: 365 - Pages: 2
this subject, people stating that law enforcement officers go too far or have no right to search someone’s property such as their vehicle. Probable cause is more than a reasonable suspicion it requires that a combination of facts makes it more likely than not that items sought are where police believe them to be. In addition to establishing probable cause for a search, a warrant must contain the reasons for obtaining it, the names of people presenting the affidavits, what is specifically being
Words: 1209 - Pages: 5
likely to happen. In this paper we will be examining the Fourth Amendment, learning the requirements for obtaining a search warrant, defining probable cause, describing when search and seizure does not require a warrant. We will also explain the rationale for allowing warrantless searches, examine the persuasiveness of these reasons, and determine if probable cause is always necessary to conduct a search. Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure The Fourth Amendment guarantees “the right of the people
Words: 1026 - Pages: 5
or witness, 4. To document surveillance of an individual, 5. To record police lineups, identification procedures and the act of identification itself. 6. To record activities of those being investigated for driving under the influence, including the administration of field sobriety tests ("Rules of evidence," 2011). Miranda The requirement of Miranda is to be given to a suspect in custody before interrogation by a police officer before it can be valid (Garland, 2011). Custody results when an
Words: 1005 - Pages: 5
proceed. This would be the case in this instance if the court granted the motion. However, there is no guarantee that if the evidence was illegally seized that the judge will suppress it because there are many exceptions to the rule. As long as the police acted in good faith when they violated the defendant's rights, the judge may excuse that conduct and the motion to suppress will be denied. In this case, the passenger's motion to suppress the seized evidence should not be granted. The search was
Words: 983 - Pages: 4
runs away. Meanwhile, the two friends, Stan, and Bill, soon realize that they have accidently taken a tuna fish without paying. They soon see a police car on their tail and are asked to pull over (Crede, 2012). They think that they are being arrested for stealing the tuna fish. They are not told for what crime they are being arrested by the police. The police arrest them as the suspects of killing the shop attendant. They contact a cousin, Vincent Gambini, who is a newly turned lawyer to defend
Words: 1191 - Pages: 5
of United Sates Argued: November 3, 2003 Decided: December 15, 2003 Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the court. Facts: On August 7, 1999 at 3:16am, three occupants driving in a Nissan Maxima was pulled over by the Baltimore County Police for speeding. When the officer asked for the driver Donte Partlow’s license and registration, he noticed rolled up money in the glove compartment. After checking for outstanding warrants with no findings, the officer had the driver get out of the
Words: 370 - Pages: 2
