3/12/14 A Defense of Hedonism Many objections have been made against the theory of axiological hedonism. I will not attempt to respond to all of them, but instead focus on one of the stronger arguments, which deals with life trajectories. I will begin by briefly presenting the theory of axiological hedonism and then present the objection regarding life trajectories to the best of my ability. Finally for the majority of my essay, I will argue for why this objection is unsound and does not prove
Words: 1669 - Pages: 7
address. Zeno tries to argue that the belief n plurality and change is wrong. Zeno argues these points in two of his paradoxes that we discussed in class. The first is the Arrow Paradox and the second is the Achilles/Tortoise Paradox. Zeno’s main argument conveys that motion is just an illusion and there is no such thing. The Arrow Paradox attacks the idea of motion. Arrows move from one point to another and motion can be defined as a change in place for a piece of time. Zeno argues that at
Words: 1248 - Pages: 5
Shawn Andrews Summer 2014 Theology 313-D05 LUO Student #23805109 Analysis In the book Is Jesus the Only Savior?, author Ronald Nash does an excellent job in presenting his arguments in a comprehensive, thorough method. In the preface, he does well to address the important clarification of terms needed when discussing whether or not Jesus is the only savior. It is essential to understand these terms—exclusivism, pluralism, and inclusivism—when diving into the various beliefs and interpretations
Words: 2019 - Pages: 9
Proposal: What is your main argument or working thesis? My main argument in my midterm paper will be that it is important to know why your nursing major that you have chosen is worthwhile before committing yourself to it and all that it contains. While having to be intelligent, patient, and driven, nurses must also have a compassionate heart and strong work ethic. I will have three supporting ideas for my argument. _______ Why is this an important topic? What does it mean to you? Not
Words: 432 - Pages: 2
these examples strongly supports the underlying fallacies due to the fact that maybe the arguers may not be aware that the evidence he/she use is ineffective and shown lack of reasoning. Though sometimes the arguer understand his/her own errors in an argument, they might not corrected properly because they think that the audience does pay attention well enough in the speech. Such case becomes more complicated as the arguer tends to trick the person for believing his own words for individual
Words: 389 - Pages: 2
endless vacuum of the echo chamber, he is either attempting to flatter us or try and fool us with an in-crowd appeal. The author may be attempting to flatter us by implying we are better since we at least seek out diversified opinions to add to our argument arsenal. Yet, he could also be attempting to say we are part of the in-crowd when he states, “you and I.” The in-crowd appeal invites the reader to join an admired group of people. Ironically, the in-crowd group would be the outsiders of Facebook
Words: 996 - Pages: 4
Liam Webster Mrs. Kennan AP Language and Composition 30 August 2017 Outliers Rhetorical Strategies The book Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell consists of rhetorical strategies within the composition. The three strategies most used are persuasion, repetition, and exemplification. These are used to show the reader about what success really is and the troubles with it. Persuasion in this book is one key part in the plot of the book.One example of this is “ In Outliers, I want to convince you that these
Words: 402 - Pages: 2
receipts or digital trails only paper trails. A paper trail sounds like a good thing; but it is not because the government has no way to track them, therefor no way to tax them. Some may argue that taxation is theft, this is not the place for that argument. The second reason is counterfeit tickets (Stim, Attorney Rich). The scalper may be an honest man with no intentions of selling counterfeit tickets, but a scalper might get sold counterfeit tickets. Selling counterfeit goods is illegal. Selling counterfeit
Words: 822 - Pages: 4
Writing Diagnostic Adam B. Summers equips a combination of evidence, reasoning, and style to build a convincing argument to prove why plastic shopping bags should not be banned. The assertive, logical, yet empathetic tone grabs the reader's attention and persuades them to agree with Summers’ point. The numerous facts throughout the paper effectively back up Summers’ argument. After he makes a claim, he provides examples and facts to further explain his point. For example, he first claims that
Words: 540 - Pages: 3
Begging the Question: This fallacy consists of assuming in a definition or in the premises of your argument the very point you are trying to prove. This is also called Circular Reasoning. Ex. I hate Mr. Scrooge’s class because I’m never happy in there. • “I hate Mr. Scrooge’s class because I’m never happy in there.” • It fits improper appeal to emotion because the student hates the class because the student is never happy in there. • I would revise this item so it would no longer be improper appeal
Words: 498 - Pages: 2
