In an attempt to illustrate that the soul, much like the city Socrates describes earlier in the book, is partitioned into three parts, Socrates presents his arguments in three logical steps. He firstly establishes the assumption that the same thing cannot undergo opposite things. Then, he demonstrates that the soul must contain at least two parts, namely the appetitive and the rationally calculating. Lastly, he demonstrates that the spirited part must be different from both of those, thereby proving
Words: 786 - Pages: 4
Crichton wrote about a concern for the environment with Environmentalism becoming a religion as opposed to a scientific field. He uses all of the classical principles of argumentation to support his argument about the religion of environmentalism. By using ethos, pathos, and logos, he makes a strong argument. Through his descriptions, he uses some fact and some emotion to give reason why this religion should be disbanded. He shows emotion, or pathos, through his comparison of the Judeo-Christian religion
Words: 725 - Pages: 3
the application of force to achieve the aims of policy. The argument he presented in this article is weak, and I will argue this under two premises. First, LTC(R) Yingling utilized fallacies throughout his argument to support claims of generalship failures. Second, he excludes the other points of possible failure to focus on one set of rank within the officer corps. LTC(R) Yingling’s utilization of fallacies throughout his argument serves to create confusion, bias, and diversions for the reader
Words: 659 - Pages: 3
Professor Thomas Shirley and classmates. My purpose of the paper was to convince my readers that Starbucks company was unethical when it fired employees for supporting unions and applied four-component model of ethical decision making to support my argument. Through the paper, I wanted people within this community to have broader perspectives after reading my point of view in response to the case. People may even
Words: 1410 - Pages: 6
The first argument I found was: Americans unwittingly cooperated with the terrorists in achieving a major goal: spreading fear and thus disrupting lives. In other words, we could have reacted more rationally and as a result produced less disruption in the lives of our citizens. In this argument the premise does support the conclusion. The premise is how we reacted to the situation when our world was attacked. If you think about the flip side of this coin. When people do bad things they
Words: 467 - Pages: 2
02/03/14 Marriage Divorce $28,800 19,500 65,000 95,000 175,000 200,000 02/12/14 Lack of Communications Personal quality employees ( Job Lookout ) 1. Ability to verbily communicate with persons inside and outside organization. 2. Ability to work in team structure. 3. Ability to make decisions and solve problems 4. Ability to plan, organize, prioritize 5. Ability to obtain and process & informative statisics - 20% 7% men 12%women Because interpersonal
Words: 926 - Pages: 4
your individual work through the four page paper. The Focus for the business-related debate The focus for the second debate assignment is to continue to pay attention to any definite arguments – the V and T argument structures (identify at least two), but this time pay more attention to the conditional types of arguments that may arise within the documentary. These are statements are include things like, “If this, then this.” Or “Either this or this” – or any of the valid forms we looked at in class
Words: 680 - Pages: 3
Fallacy Exercises, part 3 I. Identify the fallacies committed by the following arguments, giving a brief explanation for your answer. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy."[1] NOTE: If an argument is followed by “IGNORE” it is an eample that we didn’t cover and you are not responsible for it. 1. Either we require forced sterilization of Third World peoples or world population will explode and all of us will die. We certainly don't want to die, so we must require forced sterilization
Words: 3033 - Pages: 13
Rogers “Was-His” Mr. and Mrs. Banks are a married couple who seem to just not know what it means to be just that. Years of marriage and nothing seemed to ever change arguments days in and nights out. They have plenty fights and scary arguments yet they are still married as if nothing was wrong at all. The last argument that I clearly heard was over why there was no jelly left. Seriously, come on; of all things to argue about you choose jelly. It is like they can find anything to argue about
Words: 833 - Pages: 4
1. The first premise of the argument is given in the second sentence of the paragraph. What is this premise? (1 mark) Some things can be measured in degrees. For example, "good, better, best". 2. The second premise of the argument is given in the third sentence of the paragraph. What is this premise? (1 mark) All degrees of measurement are calculated by distance from the "best" of the the set as the benchmark. 3. An interim conclusion is drawn from these two premises in the first part
Words: 390 - Pages: 2
