The inspection report that I read is the Report on 2009 Inspection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board on August 12, 2010. The nature of the PCAOB’s findings includes the follow aspects: 1) The Firm failed to obtain sufficient competent evidential matter to support its audit opinion. In example of issuer A, due to deficiencies in the Firm’s testing of certain key assumptions underlying the cash flow projections, the reasonableness of the
Words: 696 - Pages: 3
In the large field of public health, it is important to include peer reviews of scholarly journals in order to offer a fresh perspective among colleagues. With scholarly review and interaction amongst one another, one can receive validation in regards to whether the quality of the work is worthy of publication or not. Also, the whole point of a peer review is to provide some type of constructive feedback so that one is able to make improvements. Professional health communication amongst peers
Words: 258 - Pages: 2
How to Write a Movie Review Writing a movie review is a great way of expressing your opinion of a movie. The purpose of most movie reviews is to help the reader in determining whether they want to watch, rent or buy the movie. The review should give enough details about the movie that the reader can make an informed decision, without giving anyway any essentials such as the plot or any surprises. Below are our guidelines and tips for writing a good movie review. HYPERLINK "http://www
Words: 625 - Pages: 3
ENGL112 Peer Review Worksheet INSTRUCTIONS: Peer Reviews will be conducted in class discussion forums during Week 7. Be sure to review the Lecture and the Discussion area for additional details and guidance. Please complete the following steps below, returning a separate peer review worksheet for each of the two classmates whose papers you review. This assignment is worth 50 points. * You will receive 10 points for submitting your draft by the required deadline. * You will receive 20 points
Words: 825 - Pages: 4
Peer coaching verses traditional coaching Peer coaching has being observed from this abstract to have being far productive than the traditional mode of teaching more so in the three parameters that were tested. Their were instances whereby peer coaching was found to be not a good tool to use or may present unwanted results. Pre service teachers lack experience so when peer reviewing they may give wrong suggestions leading one to wrong conclusions or direction to take in the future, such as incorporating
Words: 446 - Pages: 2
the Study Pre-Exam review is a paid service the school offers two weeks before the exam proper. It reviews the student about his or her lessons during the quarter. It usually starts after dismissals and ends at five-thirty to six in the evening. This review usually has Saturday review sessions. The said review is only exclusive for the ones who paid. Josephian teachers are also the ones reviewing the students. However, subject teachers of a certain level are not allowed to review the same level of
Words: 298 - Pages: 2
Literature Research Literature reviews are completed by students to learn the proper format for setting up their own research projects. The following is information gleaned on what a literature review is, why it is conducted, and how to understand completing one . Additional information on how to write a review is covered as well. A literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, providing a
Words: 887 - Pages: 4
Article Review For this assignment it is required that you acquire a research article from a peer reviewed journal and critique the contents of the article. Use the five general guidelines from the text book in your review and analysis of the article (listed below). In typing up the review please do not simply go through each of the questions listed below and give a response. It should read similar to a book review. You may find that in the article you are reviewing not every question will apply
Words: 729 - Pages: 3
Read this (this thing 1 cm. below) P. J. O’Rourke, the political satirist, reviews in this issue a new book about Starbucks. He told us, in an e-mail exchange, how he brews his own reviews: “I read something I’m reviewing the same way I read other things except more so. That is, I already keep a commonplace book (a file folder, really) for quotations, ideas, information, etc. If I’m going to write a review I mark the work for myself, but besides underlining what interests me I also underline
Words: 2230 - Pages: 9
Discuss the process of peer review (8 marks) Peer review is the assessment of scientific work by others who are experts in some field. The purpose of peer reviewing is to ensure that any research conducted and published is of high quality. Peer reviews are usually unpaid and report on the quality of the research and then their views are considered by a peer review panel to ensure that the work is valid and it supports the conclusions. If the BPS agrees that the work is valid, then the research is
Words: 518 - Pages: 3
