distinguished from company. Wrong done to the company may be vindicated by the company. The most important decision ever made by the English courts in relation to separate legal entity was adopted in the case of Salomon v Salomon[1897] and also accepted in Malaysian company law. In this case, Salomon was sole proprietor who runs the business of a boot merchant by himself. He later converted his business into limited
Words: 2289 - Pages: 10
Quasi-contract is a contract created by courts. Quasi contract is actually not a legal contract but it is actually a legal substitute which is formed to impose equity between the two parties. It does not rely on the plaintiff, person who brings a case against another in a court of law, who is suffering from loss or damage. It will be very unfair if the defendant is allowed to retain the goods and services without payment. Damages are award which mostly will be money paid as a compensation for
Words: 5794 - Pages: 24
Introduction: Companies are the dominant form of business association. The fundamental concept of company law was developed based on a case decided more than 100 years ago in the UK’s House of Lords. The case of Salomon established a maxim that a company is a separate legal entity distinct from its members. When a company is formed, it is said to have become “incorporated”. Thus it is a separate legal entity or a legal ‘person’ it has features that have given a company certain capabilities under
Words: 2470 - Pages: 10
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Course: Company Law ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Assignment: Discussing the Legal personality of Companies ------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------
Words: 679 - Pages: 3
[security interest] against Bling Bling Pty Ltd ? Relevant case: Under corporate law, there is a rule of separate legal entity explained in the case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd. Once a company is incorporated, there will be a distinction between private and company’s debts and assets, a company can contract with its members and a company can be liable in tort to a member. As seen in the final decision in the famous case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd, “…once the company is legally incorporated
Words: 1530 - Pages: 7
are exceptions, which can be executed by holding a general meeting as cited in the Act or the constitution of the proprietary company (s 198E(1), Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)). The separation of the company as a legal entity is highlighted in Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd [1952] AC 629. Macaura was an owner of a timber plantation and then established a company and sold his business to the company without transferring the insurance policy. The timber was devastated by fire, and Macaura demanded
Words: 1854 - Pages: 8
com/assets/resources/Business_Law_Notes.pdf (good outline for company law) OUTLINE 1. Sources of Law a) Constitutional Law b) Statutory Law (Ghana Company Code) c) Executive Decisions: Executive Decrees, Proclamations, Orders Judicial Decision-Case Law: Doctrine of Stare Decisis (Salomon v Salomon) Treatises of Eminent Jurists Restatement of Torts/Restatement of Contracts International Law Treaties (Bilateral and Multilateral). Compare AGOA (Ghana and US) and ECOWAS Treaty (West African sub-region). Readings: Adjei
Words: 717 - Pages: 3
Company Law for Business: Assignment 1 (i): Is the cat contract with Feline Fertility Pty Ltd enforceable? Your answer should include an analysis of the reason put forward by Lassie Ltd for terminating the contract. The area of law relating to this particular question is the Corporations Act 2001 section 124, which mentions the legal capacity and powers of a company, and section 125 (2), which refers to a company's objects within its constitution. As Lassie Ltd is a company, it is a separate
Words: 2714 - Pages: 11
shareholders would only be liable up to their invested amount of money as capital in the company, later on this Act had been replaced by Stock Companies Act 1856 and consolidated with Companies Act 1862 (CRHK, 2014).Until 1897, the decided legal case of Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd, the concept of separate legal personality had been ingrained around the world, which means assets and liabilities are owned and being responsible by the company; shareholders only owned shares of the company and would not be
Words: 2213 - Pages: 9
“The veil of incorporation can be lifted only where a company is ‘a mere facade concealing the true facts’.” Written under exam conditions (45 minutes); Words: 380 The general rule in company law comes from Salomon case, which establishes a maxim that a company is a separate legal entity distinct from its members. The liability of a company’s member is therefore limited by shares or by guarantee, which means that the company’screditors cannot seek satisfaction from the members, even if the company
Words: 407 - Pages: 2
