were evident in responses to the examination. Few students were able to demonstrate knowledge of a directions hearing. Incorrect cases were used as examples of the High Court protecting rights. In Question 3a. few students correctly identified that the Court of Appeal was higher than the Supreme Court (Trial Division) in the court hierarchy. Many students had a limited understanding of the operation of section 109 of the Constitution and struggled to provide a thorough response to Question 3b. Students
Words: 9474 - Pages: 38
Controls, Inc. 499 U.S. 187(1991) Pingping Wang Florida International University BUL6810: The Legal Environment of Business Abstract This paper is generally about the case analysis about the supreme court case Automobiles Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc. based on the legal documents, such as the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, and Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1987. This case is focus on the primary prospective of the Pregnancy Discrimination between
Words: 2692 - Pages: 11
Vittone BUSS 213 DATE \@ "MMMM d, y" February 18, 2015 Case Study #1 1.The federal Elections commission filed a summary judgement motion with the District Court to have the case brought by Citizens United dismissed. What is a summary judgement motion and why is it appropriate in this case? Summary judgement motion is when the court is asked to dismiss a case immediately. Its appropriate in this case because the film, Hillary: The movie, created by Citizens United clearly violates
Words: 526 - Pages: 3
(PALEA) asserted today that the Supreme Court’s (SC) final decision in favor of the Flight Attendants and Stewards Association’s (FASAP) on the illegal retrenchment case bolsters its position against the outsourcing plan of Philippine Airlines (PAL). “After 13 long years, the SC ruled with finality that PAL is guilty of illegal dismissing 1,400 flight crew at the height of the flag carrier’s financial troubles. Today with PAL awash in PhP 5 billion in income, the courts will clearly decide against the
Words: 708 - Pages: 3
Supreme Court of the United States, In the case of the Supreme Court of the United States, Michael D. Crawford v. Washington. Michael Crawford was tried for assault and attempted murder for stabbing a man who was named, Kenneth Lee. Crawford stabbed Lee at his apartment on on August 5,1999. Police arrested petitioner later that night. Crawford claimed he had acted
Words: 3781 - Pages: 16
blasting, even when they have not behaved negligently (was there negligence?). This rule of law comes from Spano v Perini Corp., 31 A.D.2d 788 in the Supreme Court of New York. In Spano v Perini Corp it states that the majority of American Jurisdictions hold blasters absolutely liable. Ohio being one of those jurisdictions. Bring Ohio case law A court will therefore likely rule that Melissa will be held liable for Strict Liability. Bring multiple case law. Discuss repondeat
Words: 283 - Pages: 2
the statement indeed has misled a large proportion of consumers, in order to warrant consideration. The assessment by court of Pharmacia claims that GSKCH violated Lanham act is the first step. The first claim is that “revised tough decision” advertisement violates the Lanham act by giving a false claim over Nicorette.In scrutinizing whether the advertisement is false, the court has first to consider the unambiguous claims by the advertisement. It also has to consider also whether it is false.
Words: 942 - Pages: 4
Christoff against Nestle USA went to the trial court after court established that the defendant argument of the single publication rule did not substantiate dismissal of the case. In the year 2005, Christoff won the case against Nestle USA Inc. by verdict of the jury for appropriation of likeness and received an aggregate $15 million in damages. However, Nestle USA Inc. won their appeal against Christoff after the California Court of Appeal reversed the trial court judgment of $15 million compensation in
Words: 1089 - Pages: 5
it, he eventually did. The Tax court held that this transaction was not in fact a gift, but rather compensation for the services that he provided to Mr. Berman, therefore it was to be considered taxable income. The case was the taken to the court of appeals where Mr. Duberstein stated that he was never expecting the Cadillac making it a gift, and they saw it that was and revered the decision under mere suspicion that it was a gift. However, at the Supreme Court level they tested to transaction
Words: 530 - Pages: 3
advice, Hodgkinson invested in the MURBs and subsequently lost a significant amount of money after the real estate market crash in 1981. Hodgkinson alleges that Simms profited from selling the MURBs and this was not disclosed. • At the Supreme Court of BC, Hodgkinson sued for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract and was awarded damages of $350,507.62 – the amount lost on the MURBS. In this case, the judge stated that fiduciary duty is marked by vulnerability and it was established
Words: 575 - Pages: 3
