Nike: The Sweatshop Debate Nike: The Sweatshop Debate Nike is a popular name brand product that can be found in different countries around the world. Anywhere from the clothing line, basketball shoes, or athletic gear, its swoosh logo and slogan “Just Do it” has made its way into many homes and organizations. A former University of Oregon track star by the name of Phil Knight was the founder of the product which was established during 1972. Unfortunately, the management of the multi-million
Words: 592 - Pages: 3
for its labor practices around the world. Nike executives have been frequent targets at public events, especially at universities where students have pressed administrators and athletic directors to ban products that have been made under “sweatshop” conditions. Indeed, at the University of Oregon, a major gift from Phil Knight,
Words: 374 - Pages: 2
The Great Non-Debate over International Sweatshops Maitland considers the argument going against sweatshops in a precise and candid appearance. Maitland does not escape against the items upon sweatshops such as ‘child labor’ and ‘abuses of human rights.’ He depends on the assumption that one who intends to reveal the issue is conspicuous and doing this merely for attention and publicity. Maitland states Kernaghen's efforts in regarding this issue seem to advise a favor for the media: ‘this image
Words: 435 - Pages: 2
HRM522 Ethical & Advocacy for HR Professionals Dr. Jeanette Horner-Smith December 14th, 2014 “Nike: From Sweatshops to Leadership in Employment Practices” The Nike Corporation is a huge brand that targets athletes, colleges, and product manufacturing. The company was founded by Phil Knight and his track coach, Bill Bowerman, in 1964. “The company was renamed Nike in 1978, and has grown to be the largest worldwide seller of athletic goods, with approximately 19,000 retail accounts in the United
Words: 1818 - Pages: 8
Nike and the Negative Controversy with Sweatshops ABSTRACT The following will discuss the ethical and social issues in the Nike, Inc. and Sweatshops case. It will also discuss why Nike should be held responsible for what happens in factories that it does not own, and whether Nike has a responsibility to ensure that factory workers receive a “living wage”. It will also discuss if the wage guidelines of FLA or WRC seem most appropriate. Finally it will discuss if it is ethical
Words: 728 - Pages: 3
chose was sweatshops and slave labor, which just by hearing the subject causes many to flare up in emotion. He offers his point of view from one who doesn’t have to go see these travesties first hand but still is informed. This is more than can be said for most people since people tend to like to think about themselves most of the time and choose to shut out unpleasant realties
Words: 893 - Pages: 4
1. In my opinion, one of the most important rules of ethics for Nike is to provide a quality product for the price spent by the consumer. Nike is the leading sportswear company in the world. The reason why Nike is the best is not only because of its logo, sleek designs, and list of marketable athletes, but because of the company’s focus on providing the best quality product for its price. Consumers keep going back to Nike for sportswear because they know that the product will last. For example, I
Words: 655 - Pages: 3
Could or should the company have done anything differently? Nike could have definitely chosen to have handled the labor issue differently. A company’s image is a very valuable asset, which is usually very difficult and costly to restore when damaged. This is what happened to Nike in the late 1990s, when it took a net loss for the company to realize its wrongdoing. Instead of underestimating the impact of the public, the company could have started off with an apology and to roll out a plan
Words: 530 - Pages: 3
PHL/320 Date Teacher Labor Practices - Sweatshops Most members of society deem sweatshops as an unacceptable source of labor. Others claim that many of those individuals living in developing countries, facing adverse circumstances, only dream of being employed by a sweatshop. Although at a bare minimum, sweatshops do provide its patrons a source of income. The wages earned by these workers help bring, maybe, a loaf of bread to their families. Sweatshops exploit its workers through dehumanizing
Words: 565 - Pages: 3
S. Friedman uses the article from Rebbeca Clarren as the fifth viewpoint of the book. Clarren is an investigative journalist with a particular interest in labour issues. In the article, Clarren uses the facts of the sweatshop conditions around the world to illustrate that the sweatshop workers always work in unpleasant and abusive conditions for very low income. She suggests that Americans should know the cheap clothes
Words: 758 - Pages: 4
