Torts Assignment PART 1 1) Does Autumn Bay High owe a duty of care to Persephone and Aphrodite? Consider the common law as well as any impact that the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) may have on the common law. The main considerations that have to be taken into account when deciding whether Autumn Bay High owed a duty of care to Persephone and Aphrodite are the reasonable foreseeability of nervous shock and whether their duty of care was non-delegable. Under the Civil Liability Act
Words: 3481 - Pages: 14
have been established they shall then be used to determine if the individuals in each scenario would be held liable. Tort Law Tort Law in layman’s terms is a civil wrong. It does not necessarily need to be an illegal action but an action that has consequently caused harm or suffering to another. The main outcome for a person claiming they have been a victim of a tortious act is compensation. For a successful tort claim the three main elements need to be present and their needs to be a standard of
Words: 1639 - Pages: 7
Outcomes Outcome | Evidence for the criteria | Feedback | Assessor’s decision | Internal Verification | | | | | First attempt | Re-work | | Understand principles of liability in negligence in business activitiesLO3 | Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability | | 3.1 | | | | | Explain the nature of liability
Words: 1805 - Pages: 8
reaction to a food substance and had no history of allergies. 1.Identify and explain at least three legal considerations. Based on the case presented, there are several legal considerations to consider including Negligence, Intentional Tort and Vicarious liability. According to Showalter (2009), negligence “Occur when the wrongdoer fails to live up to accepted standards of behavior”(p47). In this situation we know that the hospital facility is understaffed and negligence could have been
Words: 885 - Pages: 4
531 Week 2 Knowledge Check Question, Answers and lot more. We are having UOP LAW 531 Final Exam Assignments, so that you could test yourself. Being top in class is no more a dream with StudentWhiz. 1. Identify the true statement about intentional torts. • A person can be sued for assault even if there was no actual physical contact. • A person can be sued for threatening future harm. • A person can be accused of battery only if there was direct physical contact. • A person cannot be sued
Words: 1051 - Pages: 5
Torts Julie and Mary are plaintiffs for the J&M Jewelry store that opened in the Sunny Market Place. The defendants are Tom and Fred who own the Deluxe Jewelry in Sunny Market Place. Tom and Fred do not want the competition for their store so they decided to take action against J&M Jewelry and trespassed by entering their store without consent. An intentional tort is the most willful of torts, this intent is not to harm but rather to engage in a specific act, which ultimately results in an injury
Words: 465 - Pages: 2
in negligence in business situations Assignment 4 – Scenario As a business law student provide a detailed article on the following to present to your lecturer, showing a clear understanding of the topics: Task 1 4.1 Apply the elements of the tort of negligence and defences in different business situations [Format: Negligence: application of the legal principles of negligence and relevant statutory and case law to business scenarios; General defences: volenti non fit injuria; statutory
Words: 505 - Pages: 3
University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter) Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for
Words: 298 - Pages: 2
In this scenario several instances occurred to where one could file a suit. Intentional tort, Lee who is a customer of Buy-Mart begins shooting innocent shoppers with a rifle he is planning to purchase. One of Lee’s victims is a lady walking along with her husband in the next aisle over. As she falls to the ground her husband has a heart attack. A boy is also injured by a metal beam from the bullet ricochets but was unintentional; this is considered as an unintentional tort. Then the tort of outrage
Words: 544 - Pages: 3
LAW 531 Week 2 Knowledge Check www.UopStudents.com 1. Identify the true statement about intentional torts. A. A person can be sued for assault even if there was no actual physical contact. B. A person can be sued for threatening future harm. C. A person can be accused of battery only if there was direct physical contact. D. A person cannot be sued for intending to injure one person but injuring another instead. Click here to download Complete Answers of LAW 531 Week 2 Knowledge Check
Words: 1041 - Pages: 5
