University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. After reviewing the four areas that must be met for a defamation tort, I feel that it does qualify for a tort. Defamatory statement – this was met. WIRETIME, Inc. had a statement published in a well-known magazine that can be
Words: 468 - Pages: 2
reference to their meaning and effect…………………………………………….…..6 Apply the elements of contract in given businesses scenarios……………………………………………………………….7 Apply the law on terms in different contracts……………………………………………………………………………………..…7 Evaluate the effect of different terms in given contracts……………………………………………………………………....8 Duty of care in the tort of negligence & Difference between liability in tort and contractual liability…….8 Explain the nature of liability in negligence……………………………………………………………………………………………9
Words: 2835 - Pages: 12
Synopsis of Tort Cases The team read and answered questions regarding the four different tort cases presented in the class syllabus. The complaints from each case vary from negligence, employee incompetence, personal injury inflicted by another party, strict liability, and premise liability. The situations in the four scenarios are different, but each scenario has a plaintiff who thinks he or she has grounds for bringing a lawsuit against a defendant. Each scenario identifies and discusses the plaintiffs
Words: 2358 - Pages: 10
Running head: COST CLUB Scenario One: Cost Club Week Two HRM/546 Human Resource Law October 28, 2012 University of Phoenix | | Cost Club | Memorandum To: Pat, HR Manager From: Priscilla Seamster
Words: 1218 - Pages: 5
, Sale of Goods , Partnership , Companies , Negotiable Instruments , Insolvency , Carriage of Goods , Arbitration..etc. The difference between the law of Tort and the law of Contract is based on obligations and liabilities . In tort the obligations are imposed by law while in contract the obligation of the parties are created by their own free will and mutual consent.
Words: 3365 - Pages: 14
Business Torts and Ethics Jason Harris Business Torts and Ethics The definition of Tort is: A civil wrong, which can be redressed by awarding damages (Cornell University Of Law, 1993). In other text it states that it is a wrongful act or an infringement of rights that leads to civil legal liability. In this case where the tenant were attacked at her place of residence the intruder was solely responsible for his actions. The intruder infringed on the rights of my tenant Sharon by unlawfully entering
Words: 1056 - Pages: 5
HND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT COURSE: ASPECTS OF CONTRACTS AND NEGLIGENCE FOR BUS [Type text] Page 1 Tables of contents Executive summary-----------------------------------------------------------------Introduction--------------------------------------------------------------------------Case study 1a Augustine and Christina------------------------------------------1b Augustine and Florence------------------------------------------Case study 2a Richmond consultancy business---------------------------------Case
Words: 4714 - Pages: 19
Case Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. Learning Team D LAW/421 March 31, 2014 Tom Poulton The United States legal system provides certain rights and protections for intellectual property, which could be useful to BUGusa, Inc. The kind of property that results from mental labor are considered intellectual property. “Rights and protections for owners of intellectual property are based on federal patent, trademark and copyright laws and state trade secret laws” (AIPLA.org, Para. 1). Patents protect
Words: 725 - Pages: 3
In scenario number three, I believe fraud is the most obvious tort action where the customers can sue Franco and Sure Company for their deception. Franco can also possibly file defamation against his employer because they insulted him in front of the other employees of the company. Franco can also sue the Company for violating his right to protest and the tort of intentional battery by the former employee being escorted out by security. The potential plaintiffs are the customers that were deceived
Words: 409 - Pages: 2
Is the move away from contract and towards tort in product liability cases desirable? Introduction The approach taken with product liability cases has shifted over time. The Sale of Goods Act (1893) was an act put in place to state the terms and conditions of the contracts for the buying and selling particular goods. This act was later reformed in 1979, which fundamentally followed the same rules; the buying and selling of good were regulated by contractual agreements between the buyer and
Words: 1856 - Pages: 8
