Utilitarianism Deontology

Page 27 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Premium Essay

    Peter Singer On Bugatti Argument Essay

    Peter Singer provides an argument by analogy by using Bob and his precious Bugatti. This argument by analogy starts when Bob decides to park on the railroad tracks and gets out of his car. Bob, then notices a boy playing in the distance on the other side of the tracks. Suddenly, Bob notices a train headed straight for the child on the tracks. Bob has the opportunity to save the child’s life by pulling the lever that would send the train down the other side of the tracks leading to his precious Bugatti

    Words: 646 - Pages: 3

  • Premium Essay

    What Is Harris Argument For The Survival Lottery

    Harris proposes an experiment called the survival lottery, in which individuals are assigned numbers and would be drawn out of a lottery when an organ donation is needed. The people would be killed to donate their organs to save two or more people who need the donations. He argues that killing a healthy person would be the same as allowing someone who needs an organ donation but cannot receive one to die, therefore killing one healthy person to save two or more people would maximize happiness. (Harris

    Words: 296 - Pages: 2

  • Premium Essay

    Rhetorical Devices Used In Martin Luther King's Letter From Birmingham Jail

    In Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, King uses various rhetorical devices in order to make his argument that much more effective against that of the white supremacists. It is clear to me that his most effective use of a rhetorical device would have to be one of the logos, or logical appeal, variety, in which he states, “If I sought to answer all the criticisms that cross my desk, my secretaries would have little time for anything other than such correspondence in the course

    Words: 458 - Pages: 2

  • Premium Essay

    Explain Bentham’s Principle of Utility.

    Explain Bentham’s principle of Utility. Utilitarianism states that something is morally right if it produces pleasure and it’s morally wrong if it produce pain. The principle of Utility refers to the greatest amount of pleasure or happiness for the greatest number of people. The principle of Utility was put forward by Jeremy Bentham (1748- 1832) an English philosopher. His principle stated ‘the greatest happiness for the greatest number.’ Bentham stated that human being is governed by two

    Words: 613 - Pages: 3

  • Premium Essay

    Explain How Bentham’s Version of Utilitarianism May Be Used to Decide on the Right Course of Action

    Explain how Bentham’s Version of Utilitarianism may be Used to Decide on the Right Course of Action Bentham has been quoted saying ‘an act is right if it delivers more pleasure than pain and wrong if it brings about more pain than pleasure.’ From this; we are able to add up and compare the amount of pleasure or pain coming from each act we partake in and choose weather it is the right and good thing to do. This calculation can be done through the hedonic calculus, formed of 7 parts. The first

    Words: 757 - Pages: 4

  • Premium Essay

    Hellow

    economic, and moral interdependence are facts of life and where self-interests conflict and somehow must be compromised. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism. Utilitarian maintains that everyone should perform that act or follow that moral rule which will bring about the greatest good or happiness for everyone concerned. Act utilitarianism Act utilitarianism states that everyone should perform that act which will bring about the greatest good over bad for everyone affected by the

    Words: 663 - Pages: 3

  • Premium Essay

    In Favor of Kant

    immediately distinguish the theories and arguments and come to a conclusion which I think will justify this difficult case. I shall argue in favor of Immanuel Kant that that the homeless man should not be arrested and framed and why Mill’s theory of Utilitarianism doesn’t apply to this case. Immanuel Kant observed the world around him and realized that everyone despite different cultures or religions obeyed a specific kind of moral law. For Kant, an action can only be correct, if it is the taken out

    Words: 854 - Pages: 4

  • Premium Essay

    Hedonistic Calculus

    Philosophy 20 Ethics – Final Exam How Does the Virtue Theory Differ from Utilitarianism and Duty Theory? May 29, 2012 Keysha Latrice Gwin West Los Angeles College Philosophy 20 Ethics – Final Exam How Does the Virtue Theory Differ from Utilitarianism and Duty Theory? May 29, 2012 Keysha Latrice Gwin West Los Angeles College Virtue Theory, Utilitarianism and Duty Theory contain the common goal of HAPPINESS! Although they share this common goal the journey in which you reach

    Words: 1507 - Pages: 7

  • Premium Essay

    River Blindness

    the company. The company was aware that the vaccine will not produce enough profit for the company, but yet the company wanted to develop ethics. Merck and river blindness are a good example for Utilitarianism theory because the results brought happiness for both the company and the people. Utilitarianism is an ethical framework that focuses on the outcomes or results of actions. In fact, its name comes from the Greek word Telos, which means “end.” The two most influential developers of the utilitarian

    Words: 272 - Pages: 2

  • Premium Essay

    Utilitarianism

    Explain how moral decisions should be made according to Act utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism. (30) The crucial difference between Jeremy Bentham's Act and John Stuart Mill's Rule Utilitarianism is their usage of the hedonic calculus. Bentham's Act Utilitarianism requires the use of the calculus in every single situation whilst Mill abandons it altogether. For example, a true Act Utilitarian would use the hedonic calculus to decide whether he should eat eggs, waffles or both for breakfast.

    Words: 1055 - Pages: 5

Page   1 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 50