Premium Essay

5-4 Supreme Court Decision Dbq

Submitted By
Words 538
Pages 3
In the 5-4 Supreme Court decision, ruling unconstitutionally, eliminates the corporate and union directive stating autonomous expenditures and the endowment of electioneering communications. Simply, allowing big business corporations to spend frivolous sums on advertisements and other political techniques-in relation to the public official’s election or the defeat of individual candidates. Although it is still illegal for large corporations to directly ‘donate’ to candidates’ office, it will not necessarily eliminate the possibility of corruption-indirectly violating the peoples’ first amendment right by only allowing wealthy individuals access to political say. “Now the great special business interests to often control and corrupt the men”(DocE). None the less the decision never actually affected the amount of money given to candidates in context of contributions. “So if the decision was about spending, why has so much been written about contributions?”(Public Integrity). …show more content…
In accordance to a founding father, 1791, “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or the press”(DocC) so eliminating the spending cap would do that exactly. To truly rule whether this Supreme Court’s decision was constitutional is too look directly to the source itself. The court’s interpretation of the first amendment and their role in controlling politics , extending 88 pages long, majority highly incredulous of the governments’ attempts to get involved successfully, the minority agreed it was necessary for the government to endure the life of spending caps “to ensure a functioning democracy”(NYTimes). Correctively the government should recollect the structure of itself “being the opinion of the people”(DocB) and uphold in highest priority “to keep that

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Apush

...APUSH Study Guide 8 A weak Confederacy and the Constitution, 1776-1790 Themes/Constructs: The federal Constitution represented a moderately conservative reaction against the democratilizing effects of the Revolution and the Articles of Confederation. The American Revolution was not a radical transformation like the French or Russian revolutions, but it produced political innovations and some social change in the direction of greater equality and democracy. The American Revolution did not overturn the social order, but it did produce substantial changes in social customs, political institutions, and ideas about society and government. Among the changes were the separation of church and state in some places, the abolition of slavery in the North, written political constitutions, and a shift in political power from the eastern seaboard toward the frontier. The first weak government, the Articles of Confederation, was unable to exercise real authority, although it did successfully deal with the western lands issue. The Confederation’s weakness in handling foreign policy, commerce and the Shays Rebellion spurred the movement to alter the Articles. Instead of revising the Articles, the well-off delegates to the Constitutional Convention created a charter for a whole new government. In a series of compromises, the convention produced a plan that provided for a vigorous central government, a strong executive, the protection for property, while still upholding republican...

Words: 3481 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

American Life During and Post-Civil War

...Veer Shah AP United States History DBQ Essay #3: “American period between 1860-1880” The historic period prior to the 1860s was the most underlying era in American society as it led to the bloodiest war in the American history, the Civil war. Prior to the Civil war, the American politics were sectionally divided between the Northern Republicans and the Southern Democrats. The political culture was almost saturated as both sections had realized that the numerous compromises would only provoke questions and dissimilarities between them, with the largely interfered question of slavery and suffrage. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 had been implemented as a nationwide direction towards admitting states with reference the 36° 30´ latitude line, either as a free-state (above line) or as a slave state (below the line). Despite of the temporary success of the compromise of 1820, it was repealed by the Stephen A. Douglas in 1854 in his Kansas-Nebraska Act. Likewise, the Compromise of 1850, created by the Great Compromiser, Henry Clay, was an effort to preserve the Union by settling the issue of slavery in the newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War. Although it assured a temporary peaceful settlement between the sections, it failed to give birth to the Civil war and the rise in sectionalism. Although all these compromises had served their desired intents, politically as well as socially, in turn, they only played a catalyst role in increasing the tensions...

Words: 2988 - Pages: 12