...Negative: Is Animal Testing Necessary For Medical Research? Conducting medical research on animals is not necessary in advancing medical technologies. It is argued that animal testing is absolutely essential for medical research, and that it provides us with many medical benefits. There have been many medical breakthroughs that have been discovered through animal testing. Some of these include, blood transfusions, insulin, anesthetics and many other lie saving discoveries (Ten). Although, it may be true that animal testing has provided many medical benefits, this does not make it essential for medical research. Animal testing is entirely inefficient and animals are not suitable models for the human body. Helen Marston, Chief Executive Officer of Humane Research Australia Inc., explains nine out of ten drugs that are proven successful in animals fail once they make it to human trials (Marston 2). The discoveries that have been made do not...
Words: 578 - Pages: 3
...Animal testing can be defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects” (Dictionary.com, 2014), and is generally involved in the testing of medical or cosmetic products. Research on living animals has been “practiced since at least 500 BC,” and an estimated “26 million animals are used every year in the United States” for scientific and commercial testing (ProCon.org, 2016). While animal testing has contributed to progress in the medical field, the ethical barriers it brings up causes us to wonder if companies should be allowed to test on live animals for medical purposes. There are many non-profit organizations dedicated towards ending the use of animals in research, testing, and science education and replacing...
Words: 541 - Pages: 3
...the effects of new medical treatments on the biological system of humans. Though the method proves to demonstrate sufficient results, the use of animal experimentation is still a controversial issue. Many people argue that it contradicts moral and ethical values because it makes innocent animals suffer or even die. As a result, social activists declare that animal testing must be forbidden on the legislative level, due to the negative consequences which it can cause on the health of animals. However, one cannot agree with the statement because animal testing is the essential condition of the scientific progress and innovation in the medical area. First of all, it must be stated that due to the use of animal testing, scientists managed to find treatment for some serious or even mortal human...
Words: 1420 - Pages: 6
...Animal Testing: A Reasonable Stance Animals can give us love and happiness when we are caring for them as pets, but what else can animals give us? Over the past century animals have also given us vaccines, drugs, and more that have kept our society healthy and safe from deadly infections, all due to animal testing. But are the welfare of animals something that should be risked to make our lives better? The issue of animal testing has caused an ongoing battle in our society that deals with both science and animal rights. There are those who favor it because it is allows for scientific progress, and there are those who oppose it because it is the ethically right thing to do. Both sides have valid arguments, which most people choose to side with one or the other. With a better understanding of each side of the issue, animal testing, we can conceive a credible truth. The complex issue of animal testing is one that should not be researched in a bias way. One must explore both and all sides of the argument to come to a valid conclusion. While I have yet to find a piece of writing that equally argues both sides of animal testing, the combined research I have done on both sides of the spectrum allows for a solid foundation for this discussion. These two stances on animal testing are opposite not only in position on the issue, but also in reasoning. The side for animal testing is reasoning on the means of science and research used to develop new medical treatment, while the side against...
Words: 2983 - Pages: 12
...Imagine this situation: a new company is testing an eye care product on a subject. In the test, a substance is placed in one eye of the subject, with the other eye serving as a control. The subjects are restrained, preventing them from responding naturally to the irritation, and their eyes are evaluated after one hour and then at 24-hour intervals for up to 14 days. Some continue to be evaluated up to three weeks later. The level of irritation to the eyes is scored numerically by observation of the three major tissues of the eye (cornea, conjunctiva, and iris). The subjects suffer from redness, bleeding, ulcers, and even blindness, and are likely killed upon completion of the experiment. The subjects were in fact rabbits in tests called “animal testing.” Animal testing has raised huge debates worldwide that has raised many questions. How important is animal testing for us humans? Are the results going to be the same? Most importantly, should we ban animal testing for the sake of the animals? Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what is involved. Whether it is called animal testing, animal experimentation or animal research, it refers to the experimentation carried out on animals. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of everything from medication to cosmetics, as well as understanding how the human body works. Animal testing, also known as animal research, plays a crucial role in scientists' understanding of...
Words: 1467 - Pages: 6
...Animal Testing in the Medical Field is Wrong In 2015, the approximate total number of animals used in research in the United States was 11 million. However, this number could go as high as 25 million. Each year the number of animals hurt or killed being tested on or experimented on go up. Animals usually suffer in medical labs, whether they experience life-threatening symptom from drugs or their living styling is torture for them. Fortunately, there are laws that protect these animals from being harmed, but not enough to protect all. However, these laws are found only in certain places. Experiments involving animals can range from something little to something huge. For example, a drug injected into a rat. This is a small experiment compared...
Words: 1767 - Pages: 8
...has been tested on animals. Animal testing is a phrase that many people may come into contact with, but are unsure of what it really means. Some individuals have very misguided notions of what they believe it is. They think it deals with torturing helpless animals. What is animal testing? It is the use of non-human animals in experiments and lab settings. Now that you know that those brands use animal testing and have a better understanding of what animal testing is, do you vow to stop using those products because you are strongly against animal experimentation? If you answered yes, then you’re also going to have to stop using Clearasil, Crest, Febreeze, Neutrogena, Tide, and a ton of other merchandises. In the interest of preserving human health and progress, government should continue to allow strictly monitored and regulated animal testing because it is the best alternative to human testing, is essential for safety reasons, and is beneficial to advancing biological and medical knowledge Don’t be fooled when products claim to be “cruelty free” or “not tested on animals”, because although this claim may refer to the final product, many of the ingredients have in fact been tested on animals. Animal testing has been and will probably continue to be a very controversial issue where both sides are passionate in what they believe in. Let’s face it, animal experimentation is integral to our everyday lives. “A survey conducted in the American Medical Association indicates...
Words: 1385 - Pages: 6
...Part IV Katie Schulz Mrs. Polski Modern Problems May 2, 2013 Introduction~ Animal experimentation began in the early 3rd and 4th centuries BCE with the Greeks performing the first experiments on living animals. Ever since these early periods there has been a search to answer the question of whether animal testing is ethical. This question is proposed due to the suffering of animals during medical experimentation. Veterinarian, Peter M. Henrickson, found this to be the case in his experience during a veterinary class. The research began on Rodney a shepherd mix. “The first thing we did was neuter him, a seemingly benign project, except it took us an hour to complete the usual 20-minute procedure, and an anesthetic overdose kept him out for 36 hours. Afterward, he recovered his strength quickly and felt good” (Henrickson, Par. 4). They then proceeded to do an abdominal exploratory, opening his abdomen and then closing him again. “This was the first major surgery for any of us, and, with inadequate supervision, we did not close him properly. By the next morning, his incision had opened and he was sitting on his small intestine. Hastily, we sewed him up again, and he survived. But it was a week or more before he could resume walks he had come to eagerly anticipate” (Henrickson, Par. 6). After Rodney’s slow recovery they once again put him under anesthesia. “We broke his leg and repaired it with a steel pin. After this, Rodney seemed in almost constant pain, his temperature...
Words: 5691 - Pages: 23
...Kleemeier Erica Jones ENG 105 11-22-15 Stop Animal Testing in the Medical Field Lions and tiger and bears oh my. More like, monkeys and dogs and mice oh no. How does being poked, probed, opened up, burned, shocked and tortured all for the advancement of the medical field sound? Now think about all those things being done, knowing there is another way, which causes no agony, distress or discomfort to any living creature. Animal testing is a process or “tradition” that has been around for many, many years. The problem with this tradition in particular is that although it causes much pain to innocent animals and can be avoided, many choose to still use this practice today. Animals have been used as tools in biomedical research as early on as the days when Greek philosophers, such as Aristotle, were experimenting for their next scientific breakthrough. Ibn Zuhr (Avenzoar), an Arab physician in twelfth century Moorish Spain, introduced animal testing as an experimental method for testing surgical procedures before applying them to human patients (Hajar 2011). Many research associations claim that animal testing has been used in almost every single medical breakthrough within the last one hundred years. Laws have been passed in several countries to make this practice more “humane.” In reality, these laws are the bare minimum and do not truly make a difference for the animals that are being used for experimentations. Animal testing in the medical field needs to dissolve and ultimately...
Words: 3596 - Pages: 15
...Scientists putting animals through suffrage through medical research, but in any case, it is not contested, but on a scale it often is. There is an up and downstream of whether animal experimentation is a part of good science and also result in medical breakthroughs for humans. Depending on whether the progress may have achieved by any means. Millions of animals each year in the United States are experimented on for testing to help find cures and medicine for sick people/patients. Toxicity of medicine is put into animals and take the risk of whether or not are tests are successful or not so we can research further more. Research is led into saving lives, but what about the ones that are tested for hours on end and spend days in cages without...
Words: 1567 - Pages: 7
...head: George Marcus Student Summary of Animal Testing Is Not Essential for Medical Research Much of today’s medical progress such as; magnetic resonance imaging, computer-aided tomography, vaccines and other medical techniques have not come from animal testing (Greek & Greek, 2004). Test tube research combined with the study of why diseases occur in different people and more funding for medical research is proven methods (Greek & Greek). The week of July 30, 2009, the Food and Drug Administration announced, that 37 experts that the FDA assembled have recommended lowering the recommended dosage of Tylenol. The panel also recommended eradicating Vicodin and Percocet. The recommendation came as a way to battle accidental overdoses of acetaminophen. Acetaminophen overdoses is the principal cause of liver failure in our country which results in about 200 deaths annually (Perrone, 2009). Over 51% of the latest drugs released between the years of 1976 and 1985 were eliminated or had a revised label to show harsh side effects unforeseen from animal testing (Greek & Greek, 2004). Physically humans and animals differ and our bodies process chemicals differently. The sustenance that humans and animals use can be dissimilar, reproductive systems are different along with the average life expectancy (Fano, 2004). With the physical and environmental differences between the species, research can give diverse outcomes in the testing process (Fano). The United States...
Words: 410 - Pages: 2
...Animal testing has been a hot topic of discussion in society for many years. The debate is whether or not animal testing should be allowed. Some people believe that animal testing is wrong and that it causes undue harm to animals. Throughout the last 150 years, the practice of using animals for research has been under intense scrutiny between animal activists and researchers. Scientists insist that the experimental research they do is essential for producing effective drugs, and the animal rights activists believe that testing animals for advancements in medicine is not necessary. I believe that research using animals should continue as long as there is a reason for it to continue. Thanks to animal based research, to date millions of human lives have been saved. Animal testing is the only way to find out if vaccinations work for different diseases. We cannot just ask people off the streets to volunteer, as that would be morally and ethically wrong. At this time, scientific researchers have no alternatives for testing new drugs, as scientific computer modules can only do so much for testing. Also, the government has strong laws in place to ensure the health and welfare of test animals. As long as there is disease and sickness in the world, scientists will always be looking for the next cure and treatment options, so we will always need to have animal research. As long as the animals are treated humanely, I believe that it would be inhumane to the human race to stop animal research...
Words: 1349 - Pages: 6
...talking about animals, “ The question is not can they reason, nor, can they talk, but can they suffer?” This quote is talking about animals and how they feel. They may not be physically capable of talking with you, but they do have feelings and they can suffer. Throughout the history of the world, animals have been used for biomedical research. They were bred in captivity from the beginning never even having the chance to lead a normal life. In 1975 Peter Singer published “Animal Liberation” and changed the view of how everybody looked and thought about animals because it revealed what happens in animal product testing procedures. The amount of testing on animals in the US should be decreased, even if it has...
Words: 1000 - Pages: 4
...English 101-14 April 21, 2015 The Fight for Animal Rights What do the names Avon, Proctor and Gamble, Pfizer, Clorox, Mars Candy, Neutrogena, 3M, Crest, and Dawn all have in common? They all continue to produce products that are tested on animals. Despite the regulations set forth on animal testing by the federally funded Animal Welfare Act (AWA), the animals are still subject to inhumane treatment and we as humans have not succeeded in preventing numerous horrific and tragic cases against these animals. Even though it is argued that animal testing is the reason millions of lives have been saved, animals should not be subjected to medical or product testing. These animals are innocent creatures who are forced against their will into these experiments and it is up to humans, as the more intellectual species, to protect them and discover other alternatives for product testing. “We must fight against the spirit of unconscious cruelty with which we treat the animals. Animals suffer as much as we do. True humanity does not allow us to impose such sufferings on them. It is our duty to make the whole world recognize it. Until we extend our circle of compassion to all living things, humanity will not find peace.” (Schweitzer) To begin, there is much debate circulating that because mice and chimpanzee are so genetically similar to humans that it justifies conducting experiments and testings on these animals. Throughout history, countless incidences have been reported...
Words: 1295 - Pages: 6
...Animal Testing Spring Ma “Across the globe, new products ranging from drugs for cancer, diabetes, and heart disease to cosmetic products such as soaps, shampoos, etc., are tested on animals (The Surprising Pros of Animal Testing You Never Thought About).” Today, with the medical technology advancing at such high velocities, it is certain that animals have been a major contributor of the achievements. Over the past 30 years, science has seen 24 substantial biomedical improves. According to the American Cancer Society, these discoveries all would have been impossible with the assist of animals. Seeing the significance animal testing has devoted to the science industry, it is certain that animal testing ought to be continued....
Words: 541 - Pages: 3
