I think that the government shouldn't have to monitor the internet unless there's an on going investigation that involves internet traffic. Meaning drug deals, selling illegal things, selling people, and pretty much anything and like that. Not only should the internet not be monitored but the government shouldn't expel net neutrality. The vote on it was yesterday, December 14th, 2017. If net neutrality is gone, the government and every other company that owns an internet browser can control everything. From the speed of videos to the content you see. It's like a giant parental control. Keeping net neutrality will allow for all people to access the internet and it's great information. If it's gone, think of all the payments you'll have to pay. …show more content…
Even if the schools can pay for all of it's staff and students to use websites, think of the commuters the students bring home. The sites will work at school, but not at home. The government controls and monitors pretty much everything, there's cameras and microphones everywhere. There's drones in the sky and satellites taking pictures of everything. In our first amendment we are giving the right of freedom of speech and freedom of press. This allows us, any fellow american, the right to say what we want and write what we want. If the government starts to keep a close eye on the internet, so many people will get in trouble for nothing. I feel that it should stay in place because the government controls everything. Literally everything, they have even got schools under its thumbs. If the government wants to monitor the internet they should really monitor the deep and dark web. The clean web may have some "bad seeds" in it, but ti's not worth the governments time. The deep and dark web have some spooky things in it. Like sites to buy drugs, people, rare animals, guns, you name it and the deep and dark web have it for