Premium Essay

Beech-Nut's Bogus Apple Juice

In:

Submitted By ultraman8888
Words 383
Pages 2
In 1981, when Las Hoyvald join Beech-Nut, the company was in financial trouble. In the competitive baby food industry, the company was a distant second behind Gerber, with 15 percent of the market. Although he was new to Beech-Nut, Hoyvald had wide experience in the food industry, and his aim, as stated on his resume, was “aggressively marketing top quality products.”

In June 1982, Hoyvald was face with strong evidence that Beech-Nut apple juice for babies was made from concentrated that included no apples. The concentrated was bought from the supplier of the low-cost apple concentrated, Universal Juice Company since 1977.

First investigation by two employees of Beech-Nut showed that there are presence of corn syrup, but the Vice President of Beech-Nut, Mr. Lavery dismissed the report. A turning point occurred when investigation by private investigator showed that Universal plant only produced sugared water and invited Beech-Nut to join a suit against Universal.

Some of the executives have urged Hoyvald to switch the supplier and recall all the apple juice on the market, but he was hesitant because he claimed that even if the apple juice was bogus, no evidence that the juice was harmful. Switching supplier required Beech-Nut to pay additional cost of $750,000 for the juice and recalling all the apple juice on the market would cost about $3.5 million and means that they are admitting that the company has sold adulterated product.

He also said that it tasted like apple juice and it surely provide some nutrition. Furthermore, he had promised his Nestle superior that he would return a profit of $7 million for the year. Recalling all the juice on the market and changing supplier means that he failed to keep the promise to his superior.

Fearful that state and federal investigators might seize stocks of bogus apple juice, Hoyvald had taken several

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Scandals

...BEECH-NUT’S APPLE JUICE By Donna J. Wood and Alden Detwiler During the 1970s and early 1980s, the Beech-Nut Nutrition Corporation, with primary plant facilities at Canajoharie, New York, and headquarters near Philadelphia, was the second largest maker of baby foods in the United States, with roughly a 15 percent market share (comparable to Heinz’s market share), compared to Gerber’s 70 percent. From its origins as a meatpacker in 1891 to its modern status as a diversified food manufacturer, the company had built a reputation for pure, natural, high-quality products (Welles, 1988; Traub, 1988). In 1973, lawyer Frank Nicholas and a group of colleagues bought the baby foods division of Beech-Nut from Squibb Corporation, which had acquired the company in 1969. The new owners were undercapitalized and overloaded with debt from the beginning, and the company began to lose money. Beech-Nut signed an agreement in 1977 with a wholesaler run by Zeev Kaplansky, Interjuice Trading Corporation, to purchase apple juice concentrate. Interjuice was able to offer concentrate well below the market price (Welles, 1988), an opportunity that Beech-Nut was reluctant to turn down, given its financial troubles. By 1978, with apple juice products accounting for 30 percent of total sales, the Interjuice contract provided significant cost savings to a firm deeply in debt (Welles, 1988). Early savings from the contract amounted to about $250,000 a year on a $50 million operating budget....

Words: 3659 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Case on Utilitarianism

...CASE: ‘’BEECH –NUT’S BOGUS APPLE JUICE’’ TOPIC: UTILITARIANISM When Lars Hoyvald joined Beech-Nut in 1981, the company was in financial trouble. In the competitive baby food industry, the company was a distant second behind Gerber, with 15 percent of the market. After faltering under a succession of owners, Beech-Nut was bought in 1979 by Nestle, the Swiss food giant, which hoped to restore the luster of the brand name. Although he was new to Beech-Nut, Hoyvald had wide experience in food industry, and his aim, as stated on his resume, was “aggressively marketing top quality products.” In June 1982, Hoyvald was faced with strong evidence that Beech-Nut apple juice for babies was made from concentrate that included no apples. Since 1977, the company had been purchasing low-cost apple concentrate from a Bronx based supplier, Universal Juice Company. The price alone should have raised questions, and John Lavery, the vice president in charge of operations, brushed aside tests that showed the presence of corn syrup. Two employees who investigated Universal's “blending facility” found merely a warehouse. Their report was also dismissed by Lavery. A turning point occurred when a private investigator working for the Processed Apple Institute discovered that the Universal plant was producing only sugared water. After following a truck to the Beech-Nut facility, the investigator informed Lavery and other executives of his...

Words: 2150 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Beech-Nut

...problem faced by Peter Andersen CEO of Beech-Nut Nutrition Corporation about a delivery of apple juice concentrate from the Beech-Nut supplier for making apple juice. A private detective dramatically arrived at Beech-Nut plant situated at Canajoharie, New York and announced that the truckload of apple juice concentrate which had just been delivered to Beech-Nut by a supplier was in reality a truckload of flavored sugar water. The detective wanted Beech-Nut to join lawsuit against the supplier of the bogus concentrate. Andersen had conversation with his team members about the issue to get better understanding and consult with his legal advisers for the solution of the problem. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corporation: Company was founded in 1891 as a purveyor of smoked meats. Then diversified the business and entered into the business of selling food concern such as Life Savers, Table Talk pies and Tetley Tea. It was taken over by Squibb a large pharmaceutical and health care products company in 1969. In 1973 baby food division was taken private under the name of Beech-Nut by a small group of Pennsylvania businessmen led by lawyer Frank Nicholas. Nicholas as CEO tried to build the company image as provider of natural foods under the name of “Mr. Natural” and removed added salt and sugar from the Beech-Nut products. Due to financial problems Nicholas decide to sell the company in late 1970s. In 1979, world largest food company Nestle, S.A purchased Beech-Nut for $35 million. After acquisition...

Words: 514 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Mansuto

...Ethics and the Conduct of Business, 7/e Boatright ©2012 / ISBN: 9780205053131 Chapter begins on next page > PLEASE NOTE: This sample chapter was prepared in advance of book publication. Additional changes may appear in the published book. To request an examination copy or for additional information, please visit us at www.pearsonhighered.com or contact your Pearson representative at www.pearsonhighered.com/replocator. C H A P T E R 1 Ethics in the World of Business Listen to the Chapter Audio on mythinkinglab.com CASE 1.1 Explore the Concept on mythinkinglab.com Merck and the Marketing of Vioxx On September 30, 2004, Merck & Co. announced the withdrawal of Vioxx, its highly profitable pain reliever for arthritis sufferers, from the market.1 This announcement came only seven days after company researchers found in a clinical trial that subjects who used Vioxx more than 18 months had a substantially higher incidence of heart attacks. Merck chairman and CEO Raymond V. Gilmartin described the action as “the responsible thing to do.” He explained, “It’s built into the principles of the company to think in this fashion. That’s why the management team came to such an easy conclusion.”2 In the lawsuits that followed, however, damaging documents emerged casting doubt on Merck’s claim that it had acted responsibly by taking appropriate precautions in the development and marketing of the drug. For decades, Merck’s stellar reputation rested on the company’s...

Words: 14520 - Pages: 59