...As Brutus speaks these words to Cassius, Brutus convinces Cassius to continue fighting against Octavian and Mark Antony, rather than taking a break. He says that "there is a tide in the affairs of men, which taken at the flood, leads on to fortune", implying that opportunities come and go, but if taken, leads on to happiness. Therefore, if Cassius decided to continue fighting, fortunate outcomes would come in his way. However, "omitted, all the voyage of [his] life is bound in shallows and in miseries"; if the opportunity is not taken, Cassius would regret his decision to take a break from fighting. The words that Brutus speak are true in my life when it comes to taking opportunities. In the past, I was very active in the community, always...
Words: 302 - Pages: 2
...Brutus's purpose was to control the crowd as was Anthony's. Brutus began his speach with a hostile crowd against him as a murderer of the popular Julius Caesar. When Anthony spoke the crowd had already been swayed by Brutus' words to a point of view opposite Anthony's and were now openly hostile to him. Both men spoke eloquently and effectively and their moment before the crowd was the key moment in their political lives. Differences: Brutus spoke first, Anthony had the last word. Brutus spoke directly in abstract terms about an unproven and unprovable shortcoming in Caesar's character and the threat it posed to the future of Rome. Anthony spoke ironically and sarcastically about the recent murder of the butchered man lain out before them: as concrete a subject matter imaginable. Brutus, as one of the senate assassins, had a lot more to lose: his reputation and life. Anthony had a lot less personally at stake. Brutus concentrated on one theme and directly spoke it: "Caesar was ambitious" and somehow that ambition was bad for Rome. By stopping over-ambitious Caesar, the assassins carried out a great and noble service for Rome and the people at the funeral. Anthony facing a hostile crowd that now considered Caesar the great tyrant as propagandized by Brutus had to pick his words carefully and hide his true purpose. "I've come to bury Caesar not to praise him." Ultimately both men swayed the crowd but Anthony's speech carried the day. When he was done, no one could...
Words: 300 - Pages: 2
...Marcus Brutus and Marc Antony’s speeches “Character may almost be called the most effective means of persuasion”- Aristotle. This quote could be interpreted in different ways, but I feel it means when someone shows leadership and passion others will mostlikely follolw them. In Julius Caesar there is a huge example of persuasion, and that is the speeches of both Brutus and Antony. Antony’s speech was based mainly around pathos (emotion). Whereas, Brutus went for more of a logic and ethic approach (logos and ethos). Both of these speeches were filled with a variety of devices, techniques, and even mistakes. Which leads to the final question, whose speech was more successful? Antony’s speech was based on emotion. This is because...
Words: 553 - Pages: 3
...Brutus' respectability is inferred ahead of schedule in the play as acquired (his family foundation), and later moved down by his activity and what others say in regards to him. In Act 3 Scene 2 Brutus clarifies that he murdered Caesar not on the grounds that he adored Caesar any less, but rather cherished Rome more. In Act 5 Scene 5 Antony Clarifies that Brutus was the noblest Roman of for he didn't execute Caesar out of envy however for affection for his nation. Despite the fact that Brutus is exceptionally brilliant he is extremely simple. Toward the start of the play Brutus could never understand slaughtering Caesar, however he enables Cassius to get into his head and deceive him with fake notes into murdering Caesar. In Brutus' talk (a...
Words: 326 - Pages: 2
...to be a “noble” man? A good example would be Marcus Brutus. Brutus had a decision to accept Cassius's plan to eliminate Caesar or deal with Caesar's potential of rulership. Brutus believed that Caesar was going to be an “overpowered” ruler for Rome. He didn't want the plebeians to become slaves and he cares about the people deeply. Brutus is a true noble man because he keeps true to his word that he loves Rome more than anything and would do anything to protect it. Brutus had to kill his best friend, Caesar, because he feared that he would do bad for Rome. Brutus told the plebeians his true feelings about how we felt for Rome and how he felt about Caesar. “Not that I lov'd Caesar less, but that I lov'd Rome more” (III, ii,21-22). Brutus was showing that he cared for Rome, and that he wasn't selfish. Therefore, Brutus had to clarify why he should eliminate Caesar because of a good cause. Brutus needed to explain to the Romans on why he should kill Caesar. Brutus wanted to explain his thoughts and reasons about Caesar's ruling to the Romans. “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” (III,ii,22-23). Brutus truly adored the Romans and wanted them to know if they wanted to be slaves in Caesar's will or be free without Caesar trying to rule them. Although Brutus shows his compassion to the Romans, he didn't quite show a lot for his “best” friend. Brutus is not a noble man because he schemed against his best...
Words: 543 - Pages: 3
...down. Cassius tries hard to recruit one man who he believes would be perfect for the conspiracy: Marcus Brutus, a man who is known for the noble deeds of him and his ancestors. After much of a inner and outer strangle for Brutus to consider this, he goes along with the plan and then seems to over take most of Cassius’s position. The conspirators take Caesar to the capitol, where he is to be murdered, and Caesar utters the infamous words: “Et tu, Brute?”. The conspirators rejoice in the deed and are then later met with Antony as they finally agree to trust him. Antony, Caesar’s right hand man, is broken by the sight of Caesar’s dead body. When the conspirators leave to capitol, Brutus and Antony start to give their speeches and expose Caesar’s body. Brutus’s speech defends the conspirators and the murder and for a moment, he has won over the people. But, Antony’s dramatic speech overwhelms the civilians and now has them against the conspirators and this starts the civil war. It is a war for the power and fait of Rome where it is Antony and Octavius’s (Caesar’s nephew and would be heir) versus the army of Brutus and Cassius. And like all tragedies, ends with death of those of Brutus and Cassius. These two men, who fought bravely and closely, die together. While they both share the drive for the assassination, Brutus and Cassius couldn’t be any more different. When comparing Brutus and Cassius, we see how their personalities and morals are very different....
Words: 996 - Pages: 4
...2_9Marcus Junius Brutus, additionally known as Quintus Caepio Brutus, (born most likely eighty five BCE—died forty two BCE, close to Philippi, Macedonia [now in northwestern Greece]), Roman politician, one among the leaders within the conspiracy that dead Julius Caesar in forty four BCE. {brutus|Brutus|Marcus Junius Brutus|statesman|solon|national leader} was the son of Marcus Junius Brutus (who was traitorously killed by Pompey the nice in 77) and Servilia (who later became Caesar’s lover). When his adoption by AN uncle, Quintus Servilius Caepio, he was usually known as Quintus Caepio Brutus.Brutus was said by another uncle, Cato the Younger, United Nations agency imbued him with the principles of Stoicism. Within the 50s he...
Words: 557 - Pages: 3
...A tragic hero is a person who is defeated by their own flaws that are based on personal issues. They both have got linked to this. One of them had flaws: he was trustful, naive and did not always use the best judgment possible. Another man had a main flaw: he was extremely confident and arrogant. Death was the outcome of both Caesar and Brutus’ behavior. Brutus was an honest man. He believed that he could be trusted by anyone and this is part of the reason why he died. He figured that since he could trust everyone, that they would then give him the same respect, but that was not the case. Brutus put much trust in Cassius at the beginning of the story that he is going to do great things for Rome. No questions were ever asked because Brutus was...
Words: 369 - Pages: 2
...In a classic Shakespeare play, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus go toe-to-toe at Caesar’s funeral. Although, to Brutus’s dismay Antony’s speech was better. To begin, Brutus’s speech was formal and more directed to the Romans. In his introduction he starts with “Romans, countrymen, and lovers!” This was used to join everyone together and later help him justify Caesar’s death. Throughout the text he describes Caesar as an “ambitious” man. Calling Caesar ambitious makes it seem that Caesar only thought about himself. On the hand, Antony’s speech was more personal and sarcastic. In contrary to Brutus he opens his speech with “Friends, Romans, countrymen…”. This sets up his later statements of being Caesar’s friend. Throughout his speech, he uses paralipsis and repetition to poke at Brutus but at the same time save Caesar’s reputation. Specifically, Antony repeatedly used the word “honorable” to describe Brutus. The effect of this was that he was contradicting Brutus’s speech. A paralipsis is a device used to draw attention to something while claiming to pass it over. There are two examples of this one is “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.” But throughout the speech he praises Caesar and what he as done. Another example is “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, But here I am to speak what I do know.”, although he talks good about Caesar and what he has done for Rome, in contrary to what Brutus said. While comparing the two speeches I have found that...
Words: 366 - Pages: 2
...Cassius and Brutus’ Argument Cassius and Brutus in the story of The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar, argue about going to Philippi. Both Cassius and Brutus need a plan of attack when fighting the enemy that can easily work with the men and supplies given. Cassius argues that allowing the enemy to wander will weaken the soldiers and give the army an advantage to surprise them and attack. Brutus argues that the army should cut the enemy off at Philippi instead. Both arguments are logical but Cassius’ argument seems more reasonable and effective. Cassius believes “'Tis better that the enemy seek us: / So shall he waste his means, weary his soldiers” (Shakespeare 4.3 195-200). This allows an advantage to the soldiers when fighting “Doing himself offense, whilst we, lying still, / Are full of rest, defense, and nimbleness” (Shakespeare 4.3 195-200). Cassius wants the army of men and soldiers to have an advantage and surprise the enemies forces with an unexpected attack. This surprise attack will help...
Words: 447 - Pages: 2
...Brutus is a patriot he thought killing Caesar was the right thing to do he was concerned for Rome and its people.Others may see it as Cassius was the one who fed Brutus lies and hateful thoughts so it was Cassius' fault that this happened.People may argue that Brutus was, in fact, a betrayer because he betrayed caesars trust.All in all, Brutus is a patriot. “Our reasons are so full of good regard that were you, Antony, the son of Caesar, you should be satisfied."Here Brutus felt as though Antony should be okay with his decision.He killed Caesar because he wanted to protect people from the damage he thought Caesar would’ve done to them.However, Caesar looks at Brutus as Brutus stabs him and say "To you, Brutus!"Brutus betrays Caesar when he,...
Words: 321 - Pages: 2
...citing the men who execute their sons “because they valued the interest of their country.”[1] Livy further supports this by recounting how Lucius Junius Brutus “superintend(ed) the public execution”[2] of his conspiring sons.[3] Virtue was also valued. Sallust confirms this when claims how even the most “eminent (of) men”[4] aspire for virtue.[5] Polybius concurs with Sallust when he manifests the “impressive scene”[6] arranged for the young man who practises virtue.[7] Bravery too was valued. Such conclusions are based on the unremitting discussions of brave actions. Polybius and Plutarchaccount for this; the latter providing descriptions that are emblematic of Roman nobility’s war-lust.([8])([9]) BIBLIOGRAPHY Plutarch, Lives of Illustrious Men, Volume 1, Trans. J. Dryden (Maryland, 2008) Maximus. A.P.D., Controversial Personalities of the Roman Republic: Lucius Junius Brutus, founder of the Republic, 509 BC, (updated 2008), http://www.roman-empire.net/articles/article-032.html ----------------------- [1] Polybius 6.53-54 [2] Livy, Early history of Rome, II.5. [3] Lucius Junius Brutus was the founder of the Roman Republic and is believed to have held the first consulship in 509BC after expelling the tyrannical Etruscan king Lucius Tarquinius Superbus from Rome. According to Livy, Brutus’ first deed as consul was inducing the people, desirous of their recently obtained freedom, to swear “an oath that they would suffer no one to be king...
Words: 552 - Pages: 3
...In William Shakespeare's play ¨The Tragedy of Julius Caesar¨ a group of conspirators came together to plan assassinated Julius Caesar. Brutus was a tragic hero because he faced major challenges with his loyalty to his friends; loyalty to his country. His relationship with Caesar was strong, bit his love for Rome and the people of Rome was stronger. Noble Brutus is considered a tragic hero because he was destined for a downfall. At the end of the play he called victory too soon, and a little while after he did that he knew he was defeated so he committed suicide. Marcus Junius Brutus was Brutus ancestor. He was important because he fought for a democracy so that no one would rule. He would want the Senate to make decisions. Rather than a King....
Words: 844 - Pages: 4
...SPEECHES: Brutus vs Antony Julius Caesar: Act 3, Scene 2 Caesar’s funeral is a key point in the play and is dominated by long speeches by Brutus and Antony. Because the speeches are long and challenging, it is best to view, re-view, read, and analyze. Paraphrasing - Brutus’ Speech Paraphrase Brutus’ speech at Caesar’s funeral. In this speech, Brutus explains why he had to kill Caesar. He quickly convinces the people that he did the right and honorable thing. • View and read Brutus’ speech • Discuss the main ideas that Brutus tries to convey • Paraphrase the speech (put into your own words) • You will be graded on your accuracy and thoroughness of your translatioN Paragraph - Antony’s Speech Explain what makes Marc Antony’s speech...
Words: 1358 - Pages: 6
...The Virtues of Rome The disgrace of a man's wife is the driving force behind a revolution. In today's world that may seem like a massive overreaction, but in the early Republic of Rome it perfectly describes the virtues that they held sacred for both the men, women and the Republic itself. Livy's The Rape of Lucretia and the Origins of the Republic tells the story of how the honor of a young wife is forcibly taken away from her by the son of the tyrannical king, and with this atrocity spurring the revolution that would take Rome away from kings and into the hand of the people. The virtues of a Roman man were most visibly presented in what they would look for in their wives. They wanted their women to not necessarily serve them, but to always be there for them. Since men at that time believed women as property it was thought that women shouldn't go out with friends because she belonged only to their husband. This can be showed in this excerpt from The Rape of Lucretia and the Origins of Rome. “...they found Lucretia, not after the manner of the king's daughters-in-law, whom they had seen spending their time in luxurious banqueting with their companions, but, although the night was far advanced, employed at her wool, sitting in the middle of the house in the midst of her maids who were working around her.” This shows that the Roman men were impressed with Lucretia, that instead of being out with friends, she was at home,where she was supposed to be, knitting with her servants...
Words: 842 - Pages: 4
