The controversy over the death penalty seems to be always be talked about, however execution goes against moral rights. Wanting to have someone put to death, or doing so defines our society in only negative aspects. Having the fear of letting a human live for their actions, gives the prosecuted power over our emotions. In society it doesn’t take one person’s action to define us, however what does is the way the manner are dealt with. Also someone’s death shouldn’t be in the hands of another, death isn’t something that can be reversed. Ironic how people who favor the death penalty say that what a prosecutor has done is morally unjust, but who can justify that they have greater morality. In many instances the judgment of another has put innocent people to death, life isn’t a game to take chances on. Government plays a huge role in everyone life, whether the person is illegally or not however it should not have the control over any ones existence. In the cases of Furman V. Georgia, and Gregg V. Georgia death has been debated, from both of these cases our government has grown to challenge the decision of death. In the case Furman V. Georgia our government adopted the requirements on …show more content…
Societies have often looked at government for guidance on opinion, and to only suppress the public from reaching equality is to continue to discriminate at capital punishment level forbids the public from furthering. The officials that carry on with the death penalty are “generally responsive [for] public opinion” on colored people and now they are presented into society (Barkan, Cohn). The lack of information that the public knows about “wrongful convictions in capital cases” from the colored society is because there’s only selectively so much the courts comment on (Barkan, Cohn). Making it difficult and almost preventing development on ridding racial discrimination all