Free Essay

Cartagena Protocol

In:

Submitted By liva212002
Words 9898
Pages 40
Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 181

CARTAGENA
PROTOCOL
ON
BIOSAFETY
TO THE
CONVENTION
ON
BIOLOGICAL
DIVERSITY

TEXT AND ANNEXES

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 182

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

CARTAGENA
PROTOCOL
ON
BIOSAFETY
TO THE
CONVENTION
ON
BIOLOGICAL
DIVERSITY

TEXT AND ANNEXES

Montreal, 2000

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 184

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Introduction

Montreal, 2000
Copyright © 2000, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
ISBN: 92-807-1924-6
This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holders, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The Secretariat of the Convention would appreciate receiving a copy of any publications that uses this publication as a source.
For bibliographic and reference purpose this publication should be referred to as:
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2000). Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity: text and annexes. Montreal:
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
This booklet contains the text of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the
Convention on Biological Diversity, which starts on page 2.
Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
For further information, please contact:
The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
World Trade Centre
393 St. Jacques, Suite 300
Montreal, Quebec, H2Y 1N9
Canada
Phone : 1 (514) 288 2220
Fax:
1 (514) 288 6588 e-mail: secretariat@biodiv.org
Website: http://www.biodiv.org

Printed on recycled paper

The Convention on Biological Diversity was finalized in Nairobi in May 1992 and opened for signature at the United Nations Conference on Environment and
Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro on 5 June1992. It entered into force on 29 December 1993. Today, the Convention is the main international instrument for addressing biodiversity issues. It provides a comprehensive and holistic approach to the conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use of natural resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits deriving from the use of genetic resources.
Biosafety is one of the issues addressed by the Convention. This concept refers to the need to protect human health and the environment from the possible adverse effects of the products of modern biotechnology. At the same time, modern biotechnology is recognized as having a great potential for the promotion of human well-being, particularly in meeting critical needs for food, agriculture and health care. The Convention clearly recognizes these twin aspects of modern biotechnology. On the one hand, it provides for the access to and transfer of technologies, including biotechnology, that are relevant to the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity (for example, in Article 16, paragragh 1, and Article 19, paragraphs 1 and 2). On the other hand, Articles 8(g) and 19, paragraph 3, seek to ensure the development of appropriate procedures to enhance the safety of biotechnology in the context of the Convention’s overall goal of reducing all potential threats to biological diversity, taking also into account the risks to human health. Article 8(g) deals with measures that Parties should take at national level, while Article 19, paragraph 3, sets the stage for the development of an international legally binding instrument to address the issue of biosafety.
At its second meeting, held in November 1995, the Conference of the Parties to the
Convention established an Open-ended Ad Hoc Working Group on Biosafety to develop a draft protocol on biosafety, focusing specifically on transboundary movement of any living modified organism resulting from modern biotechnology that may have adverse effect on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. After several years of negotiations, the Protocol, known as the Cartagena
Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, was finalized and adopted in Montreal on 29 January 2000 at an extraordinary meeting of the
Conference of the Parties.
The conclusion of the Biosafety Protocol has been hailed as a significant step forward in that it provides an international regulatory framework to reconcile the respective needs of trade and environmental protection with respect to a rapidly growing global industry, the biotechnology industry. The Protocol thus creates an enabling environment for the environmentally sound application of biotechnology, making it possible to derive maximum benefit from the potential that biotechnology has to offer, while minimizing the possible risks to the environment and to human health.

1

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 2

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY TO THE
CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
The Parties to this Protocol,
Being Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”,
Recalling Article 19, paragraphs 3 and 4, and Articles 8 (g) and 17 of the

Convention,
Recalling also decision II/5 of 17 November 1995 of the Conference of the
Parties to the Convention to develop a Protocol on biosafety, specifically focusing on transboundary movement of any living modified organism resulting from modern biotechnology that may have adverse effect on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, setting out for consideration, in particular, appropriate procedures for advance informed agreement, Reaffirming the precautionary approach contained in Principle 15 of the Rio

Declaration on Environment and Development,
Aware of the rapid expansion of modern biotechnology and the growing

public concern over its potential adverse effects on biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health,
Recognizing that modern biotechnology has great potential for human wellbeing if developed and used with adequate safety measures for the environment and human health,
Recognizing also the crucial importance to humankind of centres of origin

and centres of genetic diversity,
Taking into account the limited capabilities of many countries, particularly developing countries, to cope with the nature and scale of known and potential risks associated with living modified organisms,
Recognizing that trade and environment agreements should be mutually supportive with a view to achieving sustainable development,
Emphasizing that this Protocol shall not be interpreted as implying a change in the rights and obligations of a Party under any existing international agreements, Understanding that the above recital is not intended to subordinate this
Protocol to other international agreements,

Have agreed as follows:

2

Article

1
OBJECTIVE
In accordance with the precautionary approach contained in Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, the objective of this
Protocol is to contribute to ensuring an adequate level of protection in the field of the safe transfer, handling and use of living modified organisms resulting from modern biotechnology that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, and specifically focusing on transboundary movements.

Article

2
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Each Party shall take necessary and appropriate legal, administrative and other measures to implement its obligations under this Protocol.
2. The Parties shall ensure that the development, handling, transport, use, transfer and release of any living modified organisms are undertaken in a manner that prevents or reduces the risks to biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health.
3. Nothing in this Protocol shall affect in any way the sovereignty of States over their territorial sea established in accordance with international law, and the sovereign rights and the jurisdiction which States have in their exclusive economic zones and their continental shelves in accordance with international law, and the exercise by ships and aircraft of all States of navigational rights and freedoms as provided for in international law and as reflected in relevant international instruments.
4. Nothing in this Protocol shall be interpreted as restricting the right of a
Party to take action that is more protective of the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity than that called for in this Protocol, provided that such action is consistent with the objective and the provisions of this Protocol and is in accordance with that Party’s other obligations under international law.
5. The Parties are encouraged to take into account, as appropriate, available expertise, instruments and work undertaken in international forums with competence in the area of risks to human health.

3

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 4

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Article

3
USE OF TERMS
For the purposes of this Protocol:
(a) “Conference of the Parties” means the Conference of the Parties to the Convention;
(b) “Contained use” means any operation, undertaken within a facility, installation or other physical structure, which involves living modified organisms that are controlled by specific measures that effectively limit their contact with, and their impact on, the external environment;
(c) “Export” means intentional transboundary movement from one Party to another Party;
(d) “Exporter” means any legal or natural person, under the jurisdiction of the Party of export, who arranges for a living modified organism to be exported;
(e) “Import” means intentional transboundary movement into one Party from another Party;
(f) “Importer” means any legal or natural person, under the jurisdiction of the Party of import, who arranges for a living modified organism to be imported;
(g) “Living modified organism” means any living organism that possesses a novel combination of genetic material obtained through the use of modern biotechnology;
(h) “Living organism” means any biological entity capable of transferring or replicating genetic material, including sterile organisms, viruses and viroids;
(i) “Modern biotechnology” means the application of:
a. In vitro nucleic acid techniques, including recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and direct injection of nucleic acid into cells or organelles, or
b. Fusion of cells beyond the taxonomic family, that overcome natural physiological reproductive or recombination barriers and that are not techniques used in traditional breeding and selection;
(j) “Regional economic integration organization” means an organization constituted by sovereign States of a given region, to which its member
States have transferred competence in respect of matters governed by

this Protocol and which has been duly authorized, in accordance with its internal procedures, to sign, ratify, accept, approve or accede to it;
(k) “Transboundary movement” means the movement of a living modified organism from one Party to another Party, save that for the purposes of Articles
17 and 24 transboundary movement extends to movement between Parties and non-Parties. Article

4
SCOPE
This Protocol shall apply to the transboundary movement, transit, handling and use of all living modified organisms that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health.

Article

5
PHARMACEUTICALS
Notwithstanding Article 4 and without prejudice to any right of a Party to subject all living modified organisms to risk assessment prior to the making of decisions on import, this Protocol shall not apply to the transboundary movement of living modified organisms which are pharmaceuticals for humans that are addressed by other relevant international agreements or organisations.

Article

6
TRANSIT AND CONTAINED USE
1. Notwithstanding Article 4 and without prejudice to any right of a Party of transit to regulate the transport of living modified organisms through its territory and make available to the Biosafety Clearing-House, any decision of that Party, subject to Article 2, paragraph 3, regarding the transit through its territory of a specific living modified organism, the provisions of this Protocol with respect to the advance informed agreement procedure shall not apply to living modified organisms in transit.
2. Notwithstanding Article 4 and without prejudice to any right of a Party to subject all living modified organisms to risk assessment prior to decisions on

4

5

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 6

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

import and to set standards for contained use within its jurisdiction, the provisions of this Protocol with respect to the advance informed agreement procedure shall not apply to the transboundary movement of living modified organisms destined for contained use undertaken in accordance with the standards of the Party of import.

Article

7
APPLICATION OF THE ADVANCE INFORMED
AGREEMENT PROCEDURE

Article

9
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT
OF NOTIFICATION
1. The Party of import shall acknowledge receipt of the notification, in writing, to the notifier within ninety days of its receipt.
2. The acknowledgement shall state:
(a) The date of receipt of the notification;
(b) Whether the notification, prima facie, contains the information referred to in Article 8;

1. Subject to Articles 5 and 6, the advance informed agreement procedure in
Articles 8 to 10 and 12 shall apply prior to the first intentional transboundary movement of living modified organisms for intentional introduction into the environment of the Party of import.

(c) Whether to proceed according to the domestic regulatory framework of the Party of import or according to the procedure specified in Article 10.

2. “Intentional introduction into the environment” in paragraph 1 above, does not refer to living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing.

4. A failure by the Party of import to acknowledge receipt of a notification shall not imply its consent to an intentional transboundary movement.

3. Article 11 shall apply prior to the first transboundary movement of living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing.
4. The advance informed agreement procedure shall not apply to the intentional transboundary movement of living modified organisms identified in a decision of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol as being not likely to have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health.

Article

8
NOTIFICATION
1. The Party of export shall notify, or require the exporter to ensure notification to, in writing, the competent national authority of the Party of import prior to the intentional transboundary movement of a living modified organism that falls within the scope of Article 7, paragraph 1. The notification shall contain, at a minimum, the information specified in Annex I.
2. The Party of export shall ensure that there is a legal requirement for the accuracy of information provided by the exporter.

6

3. The domestic regulatory framework referred to in paragraph 2 (c) above, shall be consistent with this Protocol.

Article

10
DECISION PROCEDURE
1. Decisions taken by the Party of import shall be in accordance with
Article 15.
2. The Party of import shall, within the period of time referred to in Article 9, inform the notifier, in writing, whether the intentional transboundary movement may proceed:
(a) Only after the Party of import has given its written consent; or
(b) After no less than ninety days without a subsequent written consent.
3. Within two hundred and seventy days of the date of receipt of notification, the Party of import shall communicate, in writing, to the notifier and to the
Biosafety Clearing-House the decision referred to in paragraph 2 (a) above:
(a) Approving the import, with or without conditions, including how the decision will apply to subsequent imports of the same living modified organism; (b) Prohibiting the import;
(c) Requesting additional relevant information in accordance with its domestic regulatory framework or Annex I; in calculating the time within

7

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 8

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

which the Party of import is to respond, the number of days it has to wait for additional relevant information shall not be taken into account; or

3. Any Party may request additional information from the authority identified in paragraph (b) of Annex II.

(d) Informing the notifier that the period specified in this paragraph is extended by a defined period of time.

4. A Party may take a decision on the import of living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing, under its domestic regulatory framework that is consistent with the objective of this Protocol.

4. Except in a case in which consent is unconditional, a decision under paragraph 3 above, shall set out the reasons on which it is based.
5. A failure by the Party of import to communicate its decision within two hundred and seventy days of the date of receipt of the notification shall not imply its consent to an intentional transboundary movement.
6. Lack of scientific certainty due to insufficient relevant scientific information and knowledge regarding the extent of the potential adverse effects of a living modified organism on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity in the Party of import, taking also into account risks to human health, shall not prevent that Party from taking a decision, as appropriate, with regard to the import of the living modified organism in question as referred to in paragraph 3 above, in order to avoid or minimize such potential adverse effects.
7. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties shall, at its first meeting, decide upon appropriate procedures and mechanisms to facilitate decision-making by Parties of import.

Article

11
PROCEDURE FOR LIVING MODIFIED ORGANISMS
INTENDED FOR DIRECT USE AS FOOD OR FEED,
OR FOR PROCESSING
1. A Party that makes a final decision regarding domestic use, including placing on the market, of a living modified organism that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing shall, within fifteen days of making that decision, inform the Parties through the
Biosafety Clearing-House. This information shall contain, at a minimum, the information specified in Annex II. The Party shall provide a copy of the information, in writing, to the national focal point of each Party that informs the Secretariat in advance that it does not have access to the Biosafety ClearingHouse. This provision shall not apply to decisions regarding field trials.

5. Each Party shall make available to the Biosafety Clearing-House copies of any national laws, regulations and guidelines applicable to the import of living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing, if available. 6. A developing country Party or a Party with an economy in transition may, in the absence of the domestic regulatory framework referred to in paragraph 4 above, and in exercise of its domestic jurisdiction, declare through the
Biosafety Clearing-House that its decision prior to the first import of a living modified organism intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing, on which information has been provided under paragraph 1 above, will be taken according to the following:
(a) A risk assessment undertaken in accordance with Annex III; and
(b) A decision made within a predictable timeframe, not exceeding two hundred and seventy days.
7. Failure by a Party to communicate its decision according to paragraph 6 above, shall not imply its consent or refusal to the import of a living modified organism intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing, unless otherwise specified by the Party.
8. Lack of scientific certainty due to insufficient relevant scientific information and knowledge regarding the extent of the potential adverse effects of a living modified organism on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity in the Party of import, taking also into account risks to human health, shall not prevent that Party from taking a decision, as appropriate, with regard to the import of that living modified organism intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing, in order to avoid or minimize such potential adverse effects.
9. A Party may indicate its needs for financial and technical assistance and capacity-building with respect to living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing. Parties shall cooperate to meet these needs in accordance with Articles 22 and 28.

2. The Party making a decision under paragraph 1 above, shall ensure that there is a legal requirement for the accuracy of information provided by the applicant.

8

9

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 10

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Article

12
REVIEW OF DECISIONS
1. A Party of import may, at any time, in light of new scientific information on potential adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account the risks to human health, review and change a decision regarding an intentional transboundary movement. In such case, the
Party shall, within thirty days, inform any notifier that has previously notified movements of the living modified organism referred to in such decision, as well as the Biosafety Clearing-House, and shall set out the reasons for its decision.
2. A Party of export or a notifier may request the Party of import to review a decision it has made in respect of it under Article 10 where the Party of export or the notifier considers that:
(a) A change in circumstances has occurred that may influence the outcome of the risk assessment upon which the decision was based; or
(b) Additional relevant scientific or technical information has become available. 3. The Party of import shall respond in writing to such a request within ninety days and set out the reasons for its decision.
4. The Party of import may, at its discretion, require a risk assessment for subsequent imports.

Article

13
SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE
1. A Party of import may, provided that adequate measures are applied to ensure the safe intentional transboundary movement of living modified organisms in accordance with the objective of this Protocol, specify in advance to the Biosafety Clearing-House:
(a) Cases in which intentional transboundary movement to it may take place at the same time as the movement is notified to the Party of import; and
(b) Imports of living modified organisms to it to be exempted from the advance informed agreement procedure.
Notifications under subparagraph (a) above, may apply to subsequent similar movements to the same Party.

10

2. The information relating to an intentional transboundary movement that is to be provided in the notifications referred to in paragraph 1 (a) above, shall be the information specified in Annex I.

Article

14
BILATERAL, REGIONAL AND MULTILATERAL
AGREEMENTS AND ARRANGEMENTS
1. Parties may enter into bilateral, regional and multilateral agreements and arrangements regarding intentional transboundary movements of living modified organisms, consistent with the objective of this Protocol and provided that such agreements and arrangements do not result in a lower level of protection than that provided for by the Protocol.
2. The Parties shall inform each other, through the Biosafety Clearing-House, of any such bilateral, regional and multilateral agreements and arrangements that they have entered into before or after the date of entry into force of this
Protocol.
3. The provisions of this Protocol shall not affect intentional transboundary movements that take place pursuant to such agreements and arrangements as between the parties to those agreements or arrangements.
4. Any Party may determine that its domestic regulations shall apply with respect to specific imports to it and shall notify the Biosafety Clearing-House of its decision.

Article

15
RISK ASSESSMENT
1. Risk assessments undertaken pursuant to this Protocol shall be carried out in a scientifically sound manner, in accordance with Annex III and taking into account recognized risk assessment techniques. Such risk assessments shall be based, at a minimum, on information provided in accordance with Article 8 and other available scientific evidence in order to identify and evaluate the possible adverse effects of living modified organisms on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health.

11

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 12

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

2. The Party of import shall ensure that risk assessments are carried out for decisions taken under Article 10. It may require the exporter to carry out the risk assessment.
3. The cost of risk assessment shall be borne by the notifier if the Party of import so requires.

Article

16
RISK MANAGEMENT
1. The Parties shall, taking into account Article 8 (g) of the Convention, establish and maintain appropriate mechanisms, measures and strategies to regulate, manage and control risks identified in the risk assessment provisions of this Protocol associated with the use, handling and transboundary movement of living modified organisms.
2. Measures based on risk assessment shall be imposed to the extent necessary to prevent adverse effects of the living modified organism on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, within the territory of the Party of import.
3. Each Party shall take appropriate measures to prevent unintentional transboundary movements of living modified organisms, including such measures as requiring a risk assessment to be carried out prior to the first release of a living modified organism.
4. Without prejudice to paragraph 2 above, each Party shall endeavour to ensure that any living modified organism, whether imported or locally developed, has undergone an appropriate period of observation that is commensurate with its life-cycle or generation time before it is put to its intended use.
5. Parties shall cooperate with a view to:
(a) Identifying living modified organisms or specific traits of living modified organisms that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health; and
(b) Taking appropriate measures regarding the treatment of such living modified organisms or specific traits.

12

Article

17
UNINTENTIONAL TRANSBOUNDARY MOVEMENTS
AND EMERGENCY MEASURES
1. Each Party shall take appropriate measures to notify affected or potentially affected States, the Biosafety Clearing-House and, where appropriate, relevant international organizations, when it knows of an occurrence under its jurisdiction resulting in a release that leads, or may lead, to an unintentional transboundary movement of a living modified organism that is likely to have significant adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health in such States. The notification shall be provided as soon as the Party knows of the above situation.
2. Each Party shall, no later than the date of entry into force of this Protocol for it, make available to the Biosafety Clearing-House the relevant details setting out its point of contact for the purposes of receiving notifications under this Article.
3. Any notification arising from paragraph 1 above, should include:
(a) Available relevant information on the estimated quantities and relevant characteristics and/or traits of the living modified organism;
(b) Information on the circumstances and estimated date of the release, and on the use of the living modified organism in the originating Party;
(c) Any available information about the possible adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, as well as available information about possible risk management measures;
(d) Any other relevant information; and
(e) A point of contact for further information.
4. In order to minimize any significant adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, each Party, under whose jurisdiction the release of the living modified organism referred to in paragraph 1 above, occurs, shall immediately consult the affected or potentially affected States to enable them to determine appropriate responses and initiate necessary action, including emergency measures. 13

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 14

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Article

Article

18
HANDLING, TRANSPORT, PACKAGING
AND IDENTIFICATION

19
COMPETENT NATIONAL AUTHORITIES
AND NATIONAL FOCAL POINTS

1. In order to avoid adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, each Party shall take necessary measures to require that living modified organisms that are subject to intentional transboundary movement within the scope of this
Protocol are handled, packaged and transported under conditions of safety, taking into consideration relevant international rules and standards.

1. Each Party shall designate one national focal point to be responsible on its behalf for liaison with the Secretariat. Each Party shall also designate one or more competent national authorities, which shall be responsible for performing the administrative functions required by this Protocol and which shall be authorized to act on its behalf with respect to those functions. A Party may designate a single entity to fulfil the functions of both focal point and competent national authority.

2. Each Party shall take measures to require that documentation accompanying: (a) Living modified organisms that are intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing, clearly identifies that they “may contain” living modified organisms and are not intended for intentional introduction into the environment, as well as a contact point for further information. The
Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol shall take a decision on the detailed requirements for this purpose, including specification of their identity and any unique identification, no later than two years after the date of entry into force of this Protocol;
(b) Living modified organisms that are destined for contained use clearly identifies them as living modified organisms; and specifies any requirements for the safe handling, storage, transport and use, the contact point for further information, including the name and address of the individual and institution to whom the living modified organisms are consigned; and
(c) Living modified organisms that are intended for intentional introduction into the environment of the Party of import and any other living modified organisms within the scope of the Protocol, clearly identifies them as living modified organisms; specifies the identity and relevant traits and/or characteristics, any requirements for the safe handling, storage, transport and use, the contact point for further information and, as appropriate, the name and address of the importer and exporter; and contains a declaration that the movement is in conformity with the requirements of this Protocol applicable to the exporter.
3. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this
Protocol shall consider the need for and modalities of developing standards with regard to identification, handling, packaging and transport practices, in consultation with other relevant international bodies.

14

2. Each Party shall, no later than the date of entry into force of this Protocol for it, notify the Secretariat of the names and addresses of its focal point and its competent national authority or authorities. Where a Party designates more than one competent national authority, it shall convey to the Secretariat, with its notification thereof, relevant information on the respective responsibilities of those authorities. Where applicable, such information shall, at a minimum, specify which competent authority is responsible for which type of living modified organism. Each Party shall forthwith notify the Secretariat of any changes in the designation of its national focal point or in the name and address or responsibilities of its competent national authority or authorities.
3. The Secretariat shall forthwith inform the Parties of the notifications it receives under paragraph 2 above, and shall also make such information available through the Biosafety Clearing-House.

Article

20
INFORMATION SHARING AND THE
BIOSAFETY CLEARING-HOUSE
1. A Biosafety Clearing-House is hereby established as part of the clearinghouse mechanism under Article 18, paragraph 3, of the Convention, in order to:
(a) Facilitate the exchange of scientific, technical, environmental and legal information on, and experience with, living modified organisms; and
(b) Assist Parties to implement the Protocol, taking into account the special needs of developing country Parties, in particular the least developed and small island developing States among them, and countries with economies in transition as well as countries that are centres of origin and centres of genetic diversity.

15

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 16

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

2. The Biosafety Clearing-House shall serve as a means through which information is made available for the purposes of paragraph 1 above. It shall provide access to information made available by the Parties relevant to the implementation of the Protocol. It shall also provide access, where possible, to other international biosafety information exchange mechanisms.
3. Without prejudice to the protection of confidential information, each Party shall make available to the Biosafety Clearing-House any information required to be made available to the Biosafety Clearing-House under this Protocol, and:
(a) Any existing laws, regulations and guidelines for implementation of the
Protocol, as well as information required by the Parties for the advance informed agreement procedure;
(b) Any bilateral, regional and multilateral agreements and arrangements;
(c) Summaries of its risk assessments or environmental reviews of living modified organisms generated by its regulatory process, and carried out in accordance with Article 15, including, where appropriate, relevant information regarding products thereof, namely, processed materials that are of living modified organism origin, containing detectable novel combinations of replicable genetic material obtained through the use of modern biotechnology;
(d) Its final decisions regarding the importation or release of living modified organisms; and
(e) Reports submitted by it pursuant to Article 33, including those on implementation of the advance informed agreement procedure.
4. The modalities of the operation of the Biosafety Clearing-House, including reports on its activities, shall be considered and decided upon by the
Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol at its first meeting, and kept under review thereafter.

Article

21
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

reasons on request, as well as an opportunity for consultation and for an internal review of the decision prior to disclosure.
3. Each Party shall protect confidential information received under this
Protocol, including any confidential information received in the context of the advance informed agreement procedure of the Protocol. Each Party shall ensure that it has procedures to protect such information and shall protect the confidentiality of such information in a manner no less favourable than its treatment of confidential information in connection with domestically produced living modified organisms.
4. The Party of import shall not use such information for a commercial purpose, except with the written consent of the notifier.
5. If a notifier withdraws or has withdrawn a notification, the Party of import shall respect the confidentiality of commercial and industrial information, including research and development information as well as information on which the Party and the notifier disagree as to its confidentiality.
6. Without prejudice to paragraph 5 above, the following information shall not be considered confidential:
(a) The name and address of the notifier;
(b) A general description of the living modified organism or organisms;
(c) A summary of the risk assessment of the effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health; and
(d) Any methods and plans for emergency response.

Article

22
CAPACITY-BUILDING

1. The Party of import shall permit the notifier to identify information submitted under the procedures of this Protocol or required by the Party of import as part of the advance informed agreement procedure of the Protocol that is to be treated as confidential. Justification shall be given in such cases upon request.

1. The Parties shall cooperate in the development and/or strengthening of human resources and institutional capacities in biosafety, including biotechnology to the extent that it is required for biosafety, for the purpose of the effective implementation of this Protocol, in developing country Parties, in particular the least developed and small island developing States among them, and in Parties with economies in transition, including through existing global, regional, subregional and national institutions and organizations and, as appropriate, through facilitating private sector involvement.

2. The Party of import shall consult the notifier if it decides that information identified by the notifier as confidential does not qualify for such treatment and shall, prior to any disclosure, inform the notifier of its decision, providing

2. For the purposes of implementing paragraph 1 above, in relation to cooperation, the needs of developing country Parties, in particular the least developed and small island developing States among them, for financial

16

17

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 18

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

resources and access to and transfer of technology and know-how in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Convention, shall be taken fully into account for capacity-building in biosafety. Cooperation in capacitybuilding shall, subject to the different situation, capabilities and requirements of each Party, include scientific and technical training in the proper and safe management of biotechnology, and in the use of risk assessment and risk management for biosafety, and the enhancement of technological and institutional capacities in biosafety. The needs of Parties with economies in transition shall also be taken fully into account for such capacity-building in biosafety. Article

23
PUBLIC AWARENESS AND PARTICIPATION
1. The Parties shall:
(a) Promote and facilitate public awareness, education and participation concerning the safe transfer, handling and use of living modified organisms in relation to the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health. In doing so, the Parties shall cooperate, as appropriate, with other States and international bodies;
(b) Endeavour to ensure that public awareness and education encompass access to information on living modified organisms identified in accordance with this Protocol that may be imported.
2. The Parties shall, in accordance with their respective laws and regulations, consult the public in the decision-making process regarding living modified organisms and shall make the results of such decisions available to the public, while respecting confidential information in accordance with Article 21.
3. Each Party shall endeavour to inform its public about the means of public access to the Biosafety Clearing-House.

Article

24
NON-PARTIES

2. The Parties shall encourage non-Parties to adhere to this Protocol and to contribute appropriate information to the Biosafety Clearing-House on living modified organisms released in, or moved into or out of, areas within their national jurisdictions.

Article

25
ILLEGAL TRANSBOUNDARY MOVEMENTS
1. Each Party shall adopt appropriate domestic measures aimed at preventing and, if appropriate, penalizing transboundary movements of living modified organisms carried out in contravention of its domestic measures to implement this Protocol. Such movements shall be deemed illegal transboundary movements. 2. In the case of an illegal transboundary movement, the affected Party may request the Party of origin to dispose, at its own expense, of the living modified organism in question by repatriation or destruction, as appropriate.
3. Each Party shall make available to the Biosafety Clearing-House information concerning cases of illegal transboundary movements pertaining to it.

Article

26
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
1. The Parties, in reaching a decision on import under this Protocol or under its domestic measures implementing the Protocol, may take into account, consistent with their international obligations, socio-economic considerations arising from the impact of living modified organisms on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, especially with regard to the value of biological diversity to indigenous and local communities.
2. The Parties are encouraged to cooperate on research and information exchange on any socio-economic impacts of living modified organisms, especially on indigenous and local communities.

1. Transboundary movements of living modified organisms between Parties and non-Parties shall be consistent with the objective of this Protocol. The
Parties may enter into bilateral, regional and multilateral agreements and arrangements with non-Parties regarding such transboundary movements.

18

19

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 20

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Article

27
LIABILITY AND REDRESS
The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this
Protocol shall, at its first meeting, adopt a process with respect to the appropriate elaboration of international rules and procedures in the field of liability and redress for damage resulting from transboundary movements of living modified organisms, analysing and taking due account of the ongoing processes in international law on these matters, and shall endeavour to complete this process within four years.

Article

28
FINANCIAL MECHANISM AND RESOURCES
1. In considering financial resources for the implementation of this Protocol, the Parties shall take into account the provisions of Article 20 of the
Convention.
2. The financial mechanism established in Article 21 of the Convention shall, through the institutional structure entrusted with its operation, be the financial mechanism for this Protocol.
3. Regarding the capacity-building referred to in Article 22 of this Protocol, the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this
Protocol, in providing guidance with respect to the financial mechanism referred to in paragraph 2 above, for consideration by the Conference of the
Parties, shall take into account the need for financial resources by developing country Parties, in particular the least developed and the small island developing States among them.
4. In the context of paragraph 1 above, the Parties shall also take into account the needs of the developing country Parties, in particular the least developed and the small island developing States among them, and of the Parties with economies in transition, in their efforts to identify and implement their capacitybuilding requirements for the purposes of the implementation of this Protocol.
5. The guidance to the financial mechanism of the Convention in relevant decisions of the Conference of the Parties, including those agreed before the adoption of this Protocol, shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the provisions of this Article.
6. The developed country Parties may also provide, and the developing country Parties and the Parties with economies in transition avail themselves of,

20

financial and technological resources for the implementation of the provisions of this Protocol through bilateral, regional and multilateral channels.

Article

29
CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES SERVING AS THE
MEETING OF THE PARTIES TO THIS PROTOCOL
1. The Conference of the Parties shall serve as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol.
2. Parties to the Convention that are not Parties to this Protocol may participate as observers in the proceedings of any meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol. When the
Conference of the Parties serves as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol, decisions under this Protocol shall be taken only by those that are Parties to it.
3. When the Conference of the Parties serves as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol, any member of the bureau of the Conference of the Parties representing a Party to the Convention but, at that time, not a Party to this
Protocol, shall be substituted by a member to be elected by and from among the
Parties to this Protocol.
4. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this
Protocol shall keep under regular review the implementation of this Protocol and shall make, within its mandate, the decisions necessary to promote its effective implementation. It shall perform the functions assigned to it by this
Protocol and shall:
(a) Make recommendations on any matters necessary for the implementation of this Protocol;
(b) Establish such subsidiary bodies as are deemed necessary for the implementation of this Protocol;
(c) Seek and utilize, where appropriate, the services and cooperation of, and information provided by, competent international organizations and intergovernmental and non-governmental bodies;
(d) Establish the form and the intervals for transmitting the information to be submitted in accordance with Article 33 of this Protocol and consider such information as well as reports submitted by any subsidiary body;
(e) Consider and adopt, as required, amendments to this Protocol and its annexes, as well as any additional annexes to this Protocol, that are deemed necessary for the implementation of this Protocol; and

21

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 22

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

(f) Exercise such other functions as may be required for the implementation of this Protocol.
5. The rules of procedure of the Conference of the Parties and financial rules of the Convention shall be applied, mutatis mutandis, under this Protocol, except as may be otherwise decided by consensus by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol.
6. The first meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol shall be convened by the Secretariat in conjunction with the first meeting of the Conference of the Parties that is scheduled after the date of the entry into force of this Protocol. Subsequent ordinary meetings of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this
Protocol shall be held in conjunction with ordinary meetings of the Conference of the Parties, unless otherwise decided by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol.
7. Extraordinary meetings of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol shall be held at such other times as may be deemed necessary by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol, or at the written request of any Party, provided that, within six months of the request being communicated to the Parties by the
Secretariat, it is supported by at least one third of the Parties.
8. The United Nations, its specialized agencies and the International Atomic
Energy Agency, as well as any State member thereof or observers thereto not party to the Convention, may be represented as observers at meetings of the
Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol.
Any body or agency, whether national or international, governmental or nongovernmental, that is qualified in matters covered by this Protocol and that has informed the Secretariat of its wish to be represented at a meeting of the
Conference of the Parties serving as a meeting of the Parties to this Protocol as an observer, may be so admitted, unless at least one third of the Parties present object. Except as otherwise provided in this Article, the admission and participation of observers shall be subject to the rules of procedure, as referred to in paragraph 5 above.

Article

30
SUBSIDIARY BODIES
1. Any subsidiary body established by or under the Convention may, upon a decision by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol, serve the Protocol, in which case the meeting of the Parties shall specify which functions that body shall exercise.
2. Parties to the Convention that are not Parties to this Protocol may participate as observers in the proceedings of any meeting of any such subsidiary bodies. When a subsidiary body of the Convention serves as a subsidiary body to this Protocol, decisions under the Protocol shall be taken only by the Parties to the Protocol.
3. When a subsidiary body of the Convention exercises its functions with regard to matters concerning this Protocol, any member of the bureau of that subsidiary body representing a Party to the Convention but, at that time, not a
Party to the Protocol, shall be substituted by a member to be elected by and from among the Parties to the Protocol.

Article

31
SECRETARIAT
1. The Secretariat established by Article 24 of the Convention shall serve as the secretariat to this Protocol.
2. Article 24, paragraph 1, of the Convention on the functions of the
Secretariat shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to this Protocol.
3. To the extent that they are distinct, the costs of the secretariat services for this Protocol shall be met by the Parties hereto. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol shall, at its first meeting, decide on the necessary budgetary arrangements to this end.

Article

32
RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONVENTION
Except as otherwise provided in this Protocol, the provisions of the Convention relating to its protocols shall apply to this Protocol.

22

23

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 24

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Article

33
MONITORING AND REPORTING
Each Party shall monitor the implementation of its obligations under this
Protocol, and shall, at intervals to be determined by the Conference of the
Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol, report to the
Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol on measures that it has taken to implement the Protocol.

Article

34
COMPLIANCE
The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this
Protocol shall, at its first meeting, consider and approve cooperative procedures and institutional mechanisms to promote compliance with the provisions of this
Protocol and to address cases of non-compliance. These procedures and mechanisms shall include provisions to offer advice or assistance, where appropriate. They shall be separate from, and without prejudice to, the dispute settlement procedures and mechanisms established by Article 27 of the
Convention.

Article

35
ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW
The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this
Protocol shall undertake, five years after the entry into force of this Protocol and at least every five years thereafter, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Protocol, including an assessment of its procedures and annexes.

Article

36
SIGNATURE

Article

37
ENTRY INTO FORCE
1. This Protocol shall enter into force on the ninetieth day after the date of deposit of the fiftieth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession by States or regional economic integration organizations that are
Parties to the Convention.
2. This Protocol shall enter into force for a State or regional economic integration organization that ratifies, accepts or approves this Protocol or accedes thereto after its entry into force pursuant to paragraph 1 above, on the ninetieth day after the date on which that State or regional economic integration organization deposits its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, or on the date on which the Convention enters into force for that
State or regional economic integration organization, whichever shall be the later.
3. For the purposes of paragraphs 1 and 2 above, any instrument deposited by a regional economic integration organization shall not be counted as additional to those deposited by member States of such organization.

Article

38
RESERVATIONS
No reservations may be made to this Protocol.

Article

39
WITHDRAWAL
1. At any time after two years from the date on which this Protocol has entered into force for a Party, that Party may withdraw from the Protocol by giving written notification to the Depositary.
2. Any such withdrawal shall take place upon expiry of one year after the date of its receipt by the Depositary, or on such later date as may be specified in the notification of the withdrawal.

This Protocol shall be open for signature at the United Nations Office at
Nairobi by States and regional economic integration organizations from 15 to
26 May 2000, and at United Nations Headquarters in New York from 5 June
2000 to 4 June 2001.

24

25

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 26

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Article

40
AUTHENTIC TEXTS
The original of this Protocol, of which the Arabic, Chinese, English,
French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, being duly authorized to that effect, have signed this Protocol.
DONE at Montreal on this twenty-ninth day of January, two thousand.

obtained through the use of modern biotechnology.
(j) Quantity or volume of the living modified organism to be transferred.
(k) A previous and existing risk assessment report consistent with
Annex III.
(l) Suggested methods for the safe handling, storage, transport and use, including packaging, labelling, documentation, disposal and contingency procedures, where appropriate.
(m) Regulatory status of the living modified organism within the State of export (for example, whether it is prohibited in the State of export, whether there are other restrictions, or whether it has been approved for general release) and, if the living modified organism is banned in the State of export, the reason or reasons for the ban.
(n) Result and purpose of any notification by the exporter to other States regarding the living modified organism to be transferred.
(o) A declaration that the above-mentioned information is factually correct.

Annex I

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN NOTIFICATIONS
UNDER ARTICLES 8, 10 AND 13
(a) Name, address and contact details of the exporter.
(b) Name, address and contact details of the importer.
(c) Name and identity of the living modified organism, as well as the domestic classification, if any, of the biosafety level of the living modified organism in the State of export.
(d) Intended date or dates of the transboundary movement, if known.
(e) Taxonomic status, common name, point of collection or acquisition, and characteristics of recipient organism or parental organisms related to biosafety. Annex II

INFORMATION REQUIRED CONCERNING LIVING
MODIFIED ORGANISMS INTENDED FOR DIRECT
USE AS FOOD OR FEED, OR FOR PROCESSING
UNDER ARTICLE 11
(a) The name and contact details of the applicant for a decision for domestic use.
(b) The name and contact details of the authority responsible for the decision. (c) Name and identity of the living modified organism.

(f) Centres of origin and centres of genetic diversity, if known, of the recipient organism and/or the parental organisms and a description of the habitats where the organisms may persist or proliferate.

(d) Description of the gene modification, the technique used, and the resulting characteristics of the living modified organism.

(g) Taxonomic status, common name, point of collection or acquisition, and characteristics of the donor organism or organisms related to biosafety.

(f) Taxonomic status, common name, point of collection or acquisition, and characteristics of recipient organism or parental organisms related to biosafety. (h) Description of the nucleic acid or the modification introduced, the technique used, and the resulting characteristics of the living modified organism. (i) Intended use of the living modified organism or products thereof, namely, processed materials that are of living modified organism origin, containing detectable novel combinations of replicable genetic material

26

(e) Any unique identification of the living modified organism.

(g) Centres of origin and centres of genetic diversity, if known, of the recipient organism and/or the parental organisms and a description of the habitats where the organisms may persist or proliferate.
(h) Taxonomic status, common name, point of collection or acquisition, and characteristics of the donor organism or organisms related to biosafety.

27

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 28

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

(i) Approved uses of the living modified organism.

Methodology

(j) A risk assessment report consistent with Annex III.

7. The process of risk assessment may on the one hand give rise to a need for further information about specific subjects, which may be identified and requested during the assessment process, while on the other hand information on other subjects may not be relevant in some instances.

(k) Suggested methods for the safe handling, storage, transport and use, including packaging, labelling, documentation, disposal and contingency procedures, where appropriate.

8. To fulfil its objective, risk assessment entails, as appropriate, the following steps: Annex III

RISK ASSESSMENT
Objective

1. The objective of risk assessment, under this Protocol, is to identify and evaluate the potential adverse effects of living modified organisms on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity in the likely potential receiving environment, taking also into account risks to human health.

(a) An identification of any novel genotypic and phenotypic characteristics associated with the living modified organism that may have adverse effects on biological diversity in the likely potential receiving environment, taking also into account risks to human health;
(b) An evaluation of the likelihood of these adverse effects being realized, taking into account the level and kind of exposure of the likely potential receiving environment to the living modified organism;
(c) An evaluation of the consequences should these adverse effects be realized; Use of risk assessment

2. Risk assessment is, inter alia, used by competent authorities to make informed decisions regarding living modified organisms.

(d) An estimation of the overall risk posed by the living modified organism based on the evaluation of the likelihood and consequences of the identified adverse effects being realized;

General principles

(e) A recommendation as to whether or not the risks are acceptable or manageable, including, where necessary, identification of strategies to manage these risks; and

3. Risk assessment should be carried out in a scientifically sound and transparent manner, and can take into account expert advice of, and guidelines developed by, relevant international organizations.
4. Lack of scientific knowledge or scientific consensus should not necessarily be interpreted as indicating a particular level of risk, an absence of risk, or an acceptable risk.
5. Risks associated with living modified organisms or products thereof, namely, processed materials that are of living modified organism origin, containing detectable novel combinations of replicable genetic material obtained through the use of modern biotechnology, should be considered in the context of the risks posed by the non-modified recipients or parental organisms in the likely potential receiving environment.
6. Risk assessment should be carried out on a case-by-case basis. The required information may vary in nature and level of detail from case to case, depending on the living modified organism concerned, its intended use and the likely potential receiving environment.

(f) Where there is uncertainty regarding the level of risk, it may be addressed by requesting further information on the specific issues of concern or by implementing appropriate risk management strategies and/or monitoring the living modified organism in the receiving environment.
Points to consider

9. Depending on the case, risk assessment takes into account the relevant technical and scientific details regarding the characteristics of the following subjects: (a) Recipient organism or parental organisms. The biological characteristics of the recipient organism or parental organisms, including information on taxonomic status, common name, origin, centres of origin and centres of genetic diversity, if known, and a description of the habitat where the organisms may persist or proliferate;
(b) Donor organism or organisms. Taxonomic status and common name, source, and the relevant biological characteristics of the donor organisms;

28

29

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 30

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

(c) Vector. Characteristics of the vector, including its identity, if any, and its source or origin, and its host range;
(d) Insert or inserts and/or characteristics of modification. Genetic characteristics of the inserted nucleic acid and the function it specifies, and/or characteristics of the modification introduced;
(e) Living modified organism. Identity of the living modified organism, and the differences between the biological characteristics of the living modified organism and those of the recipient organism or parental organisms;
(f) Detection and identification of the living modified organism. Suggested detection and identification methods and their specificity, sensitivity and reliability; (g) Information relating to the intended use. Information relating to the intended use of the living modified organism, including new or changed use compared to the recipient organism or parental organisms; and
(h) Receiving environment. Information on the location, geographical, climatic and ecological characteristics, including relevant information on biological diversity and centres of origin of the likely potential receiving environment. 30

Proto/ang 11/13/2000 3:39 PM Page 32

Printed on recycled paper at ICAO, Canada
October 2000

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Murcia Project

...mostly around the cities of Murcia, Cartagena and Lorca. The flag of this region consists of seven crowns and four castles. These last elements on the flag evoke the frontier character of the region along its history; while on the other hand, the seven crowns evoke real concessions granted to the region as a sign of appreciation for the loyalty of the region. The Region of Murcia has a characteristic dialect, of Romance origin, which emerged during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, with large distinct peculiarities. On one hand, we find variants that come from Arabic to Aragon, through the Andalusian romance. The most important resources of this region are quite varied. It is among the largest producers of vegetables, fruits and flowers of Europe, like wine, being Yecla the city's largest exporter. In turn, the tourism sector is of great importance in the region, as the region's coast has pristine spaces and the largest salt lake in Europe, the Mar Menor. Finally, industry production in Murcia that stand out are petro-chemical and energy (Cartagena). GOVERNMENT Transportation in Murcia is divided into air, sea and road. By air is the airport of San Javier, located in the town with the same name, and in turn are negotiating the construction of an airport in Murcia in 2030. By sea we find a large number of ports, all encompassed in the province of Cartagena, and in turn are among the towns of Aguilas, Mazarron, Cartagena and San Javier. By land, the region...

Words: 9107 - Pages: 37

Premium Essay

Three Major Costs

...list of new features, which will require personnel to be trained to ensure daily operations are in compliance with future audits. Included in this will be a defined list of network protocol measures, which each employee will be trained. In relation to network protocol will also be security measures, which will serve as the company standard to support compliance for Sarbanes-Oxley requirements. Finally, the newly implemented Fast action response team will need to be knowledgeable in the inspection requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley requirements. Testing The second major cost of the proposed information system will be testing, which will have to be coordinated from several locations. One of the features of the new information will be automatic network enumeration, which will scan remote pc throughout the network. Technicians will require time properly to evaluate the new network and capacity. Second, is the issue of system compatibility between the old and new system components. The testing process will be time sensitive and in some instances may require parts of the older network to be placed on stand –by. Response team The third major cost of the newly proposed information system is the response team. The response team is primarily designed to counter security threats and enforce network protocol in compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley audits. This team will need to be readily available throughout the entire project. The costs of this team are a combination of the training, and man-hours...

Words: 310 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Idnp Week 2

...IDNP:Part 2 NTC/362 06/29/2015 Importance of Communication Protocols Communications protocols are a very important communication capability. Communications protocols allow two systems or more to communicate effectively and to pass data over a network and between different communication devices. Communication protocols allows for the process of breaking data down into tiny packets that are the encrypted and signed by the sending device. Each of these packets are sent individually to cut down on errors. If any errors occur, instead of resending the whole line of data it is only necessary to send that specific packet to complete the transfer. Communications protocols also allow you to have secure and private communications when transferring data. Each packet we previously discussed has a header imbedded in its data that signifies where it is going. It will then only open on the device it has been addressed to. Also if someone were to intercept one of your packages it is still not the whole transfer since all the data is sent separately in smaller packages and they wouldn’t receive the full data transfer. There are many different kinds of protocols that govern how computers interact with each other through the internet and govern how they communicate most effectively. Common communication protocols include everything from how the data is secure to how the packets are structured and sent. Identifying Protocols/Network Architecture The links of communication and how they...

Words: 932 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Nt1310 Unit 3 Assignment

...Communication Protocols Communication is defined as the exchanging of information or news. Protocol, for all intents and purposes, means an official way or agreed upon procedure or standards to accomplish a task. In this case, it would be rules to help transmit data. In networking, there are various protocols needed to make transmission of data easier. In today’s fast paced environment, the standards of information sharing are increasing exponentially. Adhering to the standards are also becoming more important than before. Design Kudler Fine Foods is dedicated to ensuring that the customer information in their possession remains secure from unapproved access. Securing their network is one of the highest priorities for Kudler. Since the new enterprise network will be integrating a wide area network to connect all the sites, which will have their own individual wireless local networks. Choosing the correct communication protocol stack is vital to the security and availability of both the WAN and WLAN network. In...

Words: 1036 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Nt1310 Unit 3 Assignment 1

...is send by two working stations at a time there occurs collision and it stops transmitting and sends again when it founds the line is idle but it’s not defined till which period or duration it has to wait is called non deterministic protocol. It can be also defined as the system that has the possibility of multiple output for each input so that the output cannot be predict. Example: CSMA/CD Q2 Answer A timer is set, before the timer runs out, a clear to send (CTS) will be received from the access point. Q3 Answer No, for the 5 Ghz protocol have a small transmission distance approximately 30 meters and this frequency has trouble to transmit over floors and walls. If we needed to utilize the IEEE 802.11a we need multiple contact...

Words: 1657 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Kulder

...format of the data being used. Communications protocols must adhere to the following; the rate of transmission either in baud or bps. The transmission is to be synchronous or asynchronous. Also, the data is to be transmitted in half-duplex or full-duplex mode. Baud transmission is the number of signaling elements that occur each second. At slower speeds, only 1 bit of information is encoded in each electrical change. When saying 1500 baud, it means that 1500 bits are transmitted each second, this is also shown as 1500bps. Communication protocols can also describe the syntax, semantics, and synchronization of analog and digital communications. Communications protocols are implemented in hardware and software. There are thousands of communications protocols that are used everywhere in analog and digital communications. Computer networks cannot exist without them. With KFF, being that the Home Office or Headquarters is located in La Jolla, there is a T3 dedicated line that connects HQ with Del Mar and Encinitas locations. These lines are usually rented at a monthly or yearly rate to connect geographically separate offices for private voice and or data networking. It is also very costly averaging over $3000 USD per month, so most don’t lease these lines. They are also reserved circuits that operate over either copper or fiber optics cables. One of the protocols that should be implemented is the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP). TCP/IP is the set of rules for...

Words: 838 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Environmental Law

...Introduction The aim of this paper is to discuss the role of the law and science in moving us towards a more sustainable future. This will be done with the aid of selected global environmental treaties. In order to achieve this aim, the paper is going to begin with an introduction which is going to define key concepts identified. The main body will embark on the discussion at hand. The main body will begin by outlining the role of the law generally and will move on to look at the role of science generally. Thereon selected global treaties will be discussed in relation to their respective roles both at law and science. Lastly but not the least an elaborate conclusion will be given. Definition of Key Terms Environment: Environment refers to the totality of the surroundings within which humans live and exploit resources for their welfare and development. Main Body In order to effectively challenge problems that pose a threat to the earth, there is need for an effective approach which is backed by robust scientific evidence. This would ultimately usher into place a new and more powerful environmental law. In order to appreciate the relationship between the law and science, there is need for understanding of their respective roles towards the achievement of a more sustainable future. The Role of the Law The law has a fundamental role to play in the movement of protecting the environment towards a more sustainable future. In most jurisdictions in the absence of constitutional...

Words: 3209 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Bangladesh’s Achievements and Expectations from the Unfccc Climate Change Negotiations (Cop)

...pre-industrial global average temperature. The UNFCCC was opened for signature on May 9, 1992 after an Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee produced the text of the Framework Convention as a report following its meeting in New York. Countries who sign up to the UNFCCC are known as ‘Parties’. As of March 2014, UNFCCC has 196 parties. Since the UNFCCC entered into force, the parties have been meeting annually in Conferences of the Parties (COP) to assess progress in dealing with climate change. The parties to the convention have met annually from 1995 in COP to assess progress in dealing with climate change. From 2005 the Conferences have also served as the Meetings of Parties of the Kyoto Protocol (MOP). Also parties to the Convention that are not parties to the Protocol can participate in Protocol-related meetings as observers. The first conference was held in 1995 in Berlin, while the 2012 conference was held in Doha. On November 11-22, 2013, COP-19 was held in Warsaw, Poland. A key element of the UNFCCC is that parties should act to protect the climate system “on the basis of equality and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities...

Words: 2036 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Logistic Company

...The Logistic Company - Case Solution 1. Protagonist a. Satish - night-duty Airport Executive at the Mumbai airport. b. Security guard - Bangalore office. c. Ravi – Responsible for loading on the flight and sending pre-alert. d. Charles - the Asst. Manager Operations, of the Bangalore office. e. Hari - the HR Executive of the Bangalore office. 2. Problem f. Communication gap between the Bangalore office of ABC logistics and Mumbai airport executive. g. Excess booking by other logistic companies and there was no space, so cargo officials of all the airlines refused to accept load. h. Ravi did not intimate the airport executive in Mumbai about the consignment, i.e. they will not be able send the consignment. i. Charles was caught by the night duty patrol cops. 3. Parameters j. Pre-Alert for loaded goods. k. Excess booking by other logistic companies l. Ravi did not intimate 4. Assumptions m. Load will be send every day from Bangalore office to Mumbai via Flight n. If no load is dispatched, information for the same is necessary to be sent Airport Executive at the Mumbai airport o. Ravi is the person in charge for dispatching and sending pre-alert for sending the pre-alert. 5. Various probable solutions p. Information Alert for not loading the goods for XYZ reasons need to be communicated to the Airport Executive at the Mumbai airport. ...

Words: 412 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Network Analyst

...conferences calls and video meetings and the routers has advance encryption measures for security thus providing higher scalability which enables WAN link security and VPN services. The network engineer monitors the server on a daily basis and provides security updates and patches on the weekend along with the Database Admin personal. The network structure of the company is very important because every system runs on it. The data that the company has stored on its servers is very sensitive, so there need for communication protocols. There are numerous communicating devices and when these different devices want to communicate, they must use a language which is understandable among these devices. Communication Protocols are rules and regulation (language) these devices use to share data and information. As these protocols base on standards, every device on the network follows these rules. So communication is possible only due to protocols. A few protocols that have been implemented within the company are the direction of information flow, data formats for data exchange, detection of transmission errors and loss of information. There are many other that...

Words: 689 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Switches, Routers, and Gateways

...networks. While connecting two or more networks, routers can do this whether these networks have the same or even different data link protocols, but the same network protocol. One advantage that a router has is that a router is capable of choosing the best route for the flow of information between networks, even if there are several possible routes. This is a result of the router knowing its own location within the network along with the packets final destination. The routing table, used by the router, identifies the best path. Another distinct advantage of a router is that it only deals with messages that are directly addressed to it. You will find that routers work on the Network Layer. Operating at the network layer, Gateways process messages using the network layer address. Interfacing between two or more dissimilar networks is what makes gateways more complex than routers. Although it’s usually different, Gateways do connect two or more networks that use different or the same data link and network protocols. This is accomplished by connecting with the same or even different kinds of cables. Gateways have also been known to operate on the application layer too. Operating on the network layer, routers connect two or more networks using the same and sometimes different data link protocols. Routers also use the same network protocol. Similar to gateways, routers may use the same or different types of cables. Routers generally operate much slower as a result of performing...

Words: 345 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Network Protocols

...The importance of communication protocols: Unless Patton Fuller Community Hospital has an agreement between the two communicating parties information may get lost or un-communicated. This agreement is called the protocol. Communications protocols usually have a number of parts, Handshake, encoding method, compressions methods, packet / frame structure, and addressing.. This is why protocols are often defined by standards bodies, but some protocols SSL can be used widely even though they are not specifically from a standards body. A protocol must be implemented to enable effective, efficient communication by using a set of rules. Protocols are also described as hardware or software components that carry out the OSI model guidelines for transferring information on a network In short - if we don't have a protocol we won't be able to communicate between different devices. Identify the protocols in your design and provide rationale for your decision Define the overall network architecture. The design of a communications system, which includes the backbones, routers, switches, wireless access points, access methods and protocols used May refer only to the access method in a LAN, such as Ethernet or Token Ring Network architecture is the design of a communications network. It is a framework for the specification of a network's physical components and their functional organization and configuration, its operational principles and procedures, as well as data formats used in its...

Words: 1950 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Service Request Sr-Rm-019

...Service Request SR-rm-019 Ian Maley, Travis Cooper, Charles Nelson Truett NTC 360 November 11, 2011 Angela Young Service Request SR-rm-019 Background Riordan Manufacturing, a Fortune 1000 enterprise and owned by Riordan Industries. The organization established by Dr. Riordan has received a number of patents. The patents relate with developing polymers into high tensile strength plastic substrates. During 1992 Dr. Riordan bought a fan manufacturing facility in Pontiac, Michigan. During 1993, he developed into the plastic beverage storage units. For the plastic beverage storage units manufacturing, he bought one more manufacturing facility in Albany, Georgia. During 2000, Dr. Riordan developed to another country to Hangzhou, China. The Albany factory manufactures the plastic beverage storage units. The Pontiac factory manufactures the customized plastic parts. China plant manufactures the plastic fan parts. The company’s Research and Development is carried out at the corporation head office in San Jose. The main clients are automobile parts producers, aircraft manufacturers, the Department of Defense, beverage producers and bottlers, and appliance producers (UOPX, 2004). Current Systems Each factory is currently using various telecommunication systems. The head office in San Jose has 35 IP telephones. Additionally they use a VOIP/Data router; two 24 port switches Cisco 5950, 24 Port Hub Linksys EF2H24, Ethernet 100 base T as well as a WIN network Server. The Albany...

Words: 2515 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Integrative Network Design Project

...Network Design Project II Communications protocols are where the rubber meets the road when discussing communications between computers. These protocols set the parameters for computer communication and allow them to communicate in an organized manner. Without protocols a network would be worthless and very ineffective. The protocols help not only in preventing errors but they also provide a way of tracking down errors by giving the user a systematic process to check for possible repairs. Some of the main things protocols do are: 1. Provide private communication capabilities. 2. Give users the ability to authenticate traffic. 3. Organizes packets (Packets are data organized in a specific format containing user information/ handling instructions). 4. Provide a way to pinpoint errors in communication. The proposed changes to the system are based on the technical vulnerabilities caused by using hardware/software and wiring that is old or not optimal. The current protocols used are acceptable but need to be overhauled in order to provide Kudler with faster communication over long distance. Uniformity of the network is obvious in the current Ethernet network set up built over T3 100 base connections and the versatility of the Novell 4.11 server is a plus; but the Novell uses an Internet Package Exchange/Sequence Package protocol (IPX/SPX). This protocol is generally supported but not globally supported like TCP/IP. The IPX/SPX protocol works great with Intranet/Intraware and...

Words: 745 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Accounting for Emission Trading

...Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review Volume 39 | Issue 2 Article 7 6-1-2012 Accounting for Emissions Trading: How Allowances Appear on Financial Statements Could Influence the Effectiveness of Programs to Curb Pollution Laura E. Souchik Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Laura E. Souchik, Accounting for Emissions Trading: How Allowances Appear on Financial Statements Could Influence the Effectiveness of Programs to Curb Pollution, 39 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 475 (2012), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr/vol39/iss2/7 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact nick.szydlowski@bc.edu. ACCOUNTING FOR EMISSIONS TRADING: HOW ALLOWANCES APPEAR ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS COULD INFLUENCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAMS TO CURB POLLUTION Laura E. Souchik* Abstract: Cap-and-trade programs to curb carbon emissions frequently rely on the use of tradable emissions credits known as “allowances.” To date, companies' presentations of their usage of these allowances on their financial statements has not been uniform. Cap-and-trade programs will be most effective when presentation of allowances on...

Words: 11507 - Pages: 47