Free Essay

Casro

In:

Submitted By doctortasha
Words 6613
Pages 27
CASRO Code of Standards and Ethics
DBA student
Natasha Johnson

There are four main responsibilities in the CASRO Code if Standards and Ethics: Responsibilities to Respondents, Responsibilities to Clients, Responsibilities in Reporting to Clients and the Public, and Responsibilities to Outside Contractors and Interviewers.

The CASRO Code of Standards and Ethics
This Code of Standards and Ethics for Survey Research sets forth the agreed-upon rules of ethical conduct for survey research organizations. Acceptance of this Code is mandatory for all CASRO members.

The Code has been organized into sections describing the responsibilities of a survey research organization to Respondents, Clients and Outside Contractors and in reporting study results.

This Code is not intended to be, nor should it be, an immutable document. Circumstances may arise that are not covered by this Code or that may call for modification of some aspect of this Code. The Standards Committee and the Board of Directors of CASRO will evaluate these circumstances as they arise and, if appropriate, revise the Code. The Code, therefore, is a living document that seeks to be responsive to the changing world of survey research. To continue to be contemporary, CASRO advocates ongoing, two-way communication with Members, Respondents, Clients, Outside Contractors, Consultants and Interviewers.
I. Responsibilities to Respondents

Preamble

Researchers have professional and legal responsibilities to their respondents that are embodied in the procedures of a research study. Underlying these specific responsibilities are four fundamental ethical principles:
Respondents should be:
a. willing participants in survey research;
b. appropriately informed about the survey's intentions and how their personal information and survey responses will be used and protected;
c. sufficiently satisfied with their survey experience;
d. willing to participate again in survey research.
A. Confidentiality

1. Since individuals who are interviewed are the lifeblood of the Survey Research Industry, it is essential that Survey Research Organizations be responsible for protecting from disclosure to third parties--including Clients and members of the Public--the identity of individual Respondents as well as Respondent-identifiable information, unless the Respondent expressly requests or permits such disclosure.

2. This principle of confidentiality is qualified by the following exceptions:
a. A minimal amount of Respondent-identifiable information will be disclosed to the Client to permit the Client: (1) to validate interviews and/or (2) to determine an additional fact of analytical importance to the study (including the practice of appending Client-owned database information to the Survey Research Organization's data file as an analytic aid). Where additional inquiry is indicated, Respondents must be given a sound reason for the re-inquiry; a refusal by Respondent to continue must be respected.

Before disclosing Respondent-identifiable information to a Client for purposes of interview validation or re-inquiry, the Survey Research Organization must take whatever steps are needed to ensure that the Client will conduct the validation or recon tact in a fully professional manner. This includes the avoidance of multiple validation contacts or other conduct that would harass or could embarrass Respondents. It also includes avoidance of any use of the information (e.g., lead generation) for other than legitimate and ethical Survey Research purposes or to respond to Customer/Respondent complaints. Assurance that the Client will respect such limitations and maintain Respondent confidentiality should be confirmed in writing before any confidential information is disclosed.

Where Respondent-identifiable data is disclosed to clients so that the Survey Research Organization may analyze survey data in combination with other respondent-level data such as internal customer data, respondent-level data from another survey, etc., it is understood that the information will be used for model building, internal (Survey Research Organization) analysis, or the like and not for individual marketing efforts and that no action can be taken toward an individual respondent simply because of his or her participation in the survey. To assure Client compliance, the Survey Research Organization must obtain written confirmation from the Client before releasing any data. (A suggested CASRO® Client agreement clause is available.)

Further, with respect to such research uses as Database Segmentation and/or Modeling (see preceding paragraph), specific action(s) may not be taken toward an individual Respondent as a result of his/her survey information and participation beyond those actions taken toward the entire database population group the Respondent by chance has been selected to represent. In order for such specific action, the following two elements must be met:

The Respondent has first given his/her permission to do so, having been told the general purpose and limitations of such use; and

The research firm has obtained a written agreement from the Client assuring that no other use will be made of Respondent-identifiable information.

Predictive equations which integrate a segmentation scheme into a Client database may be applied so long as no action is taken toward an individual Respondent simply because of his or her participation in the survey. Respondents must be treated like all other individuals in the database according to the segment(s) to which they belong or have been assigned.

b. The identity of individual Respondents and Respondent-identifiable information may be disclosed to other Survey Research Organizations whenever such organizations are conducting different phases of a multi-stage study (e.g., a trend study). The initial Research Company should confirm in writing that Respondent confidentiality will be maintained in accordance with the Code.

c. In the case of research in which representatives of the Client or others are present, such Client representatives and others should be asked not to disclose to anyone not present the identity of individual Participants or other Participant-identifying information except as needed to respond, with the Participant's prior specific approval, to any complaint by one or more of the Participants concerning a product or service supplied by the Client.
3. The principle of Respondent confidentiality includes the following specific applications or safeguards:
a. Survey Research Organizations' staff or personnel should not use or discuss Respondent-identifiable data or information for other than legitimate internal research purposes.

b. The Survey Research Organization has the responsibility for insuring that Subcontractors (Interviewers, Interviewing Services and Validation, Coding, and Tabulation Organizations) and Consultants are aware of and agree to maintain and respect Respondent confidentiality whenever the identity of Respondents or Respondent-identifiable information is disclosed to such entities.

c. Before permitting Clients or others to have access to completed questionnaires in circumstances other than those described above, Respondent names and other Respondent-identifying information (e.g., telephone numbers) should be deleted.

d. Invisible identifiers on mail questionnaires that connect Respondent answers to particular Respondents should not be used. Visible identification numbers may be used but should be accompanied by an explanation that such identifiers are for control purposes only and that Respondent confidentiality will not be compromised.

e. Any Survey Research Organization that receives from a Client or other entity information that it knows or reasonably believes to be confidential, Respondent-identifiable information should only use such information in accordance with the principles and procedures described in this Code.

f. The use of survey results in a legal proceeding does not relieve the Survey Research Organization of its ethical obligation to maintain in confidence all Respondent-identifiable information or lessen the importance of Respondent anonymity. Consequently, Survey Research firms confronted with a subpoena or other legal process requesting the disclosure of Respondent-identifiable information should take all reasonable steps to oppose such requests, including informing the court or other decision-maker involved of the factors justifying confidentiality and Respondent anonymity and interposing all appropriate defenses to the request for disclosure.
B. Privacy and the Avoidance of Harassment

1. Survey Research Organizations have a responsibility to strike a proper balance between the needs for research in contemporary American life and the privacy of individuals who become the Respondents in the research. To achieve this balance:
a. Respondents will be protected from unnecessary and unwanted intrusions and/or any form of personal harassment.

b. The voluntary character of the Interviewer-Respondent contact should be stated explicitly where the Respondent might have reason to believe that cooperation is not voluntary.
2. This principle of privacy includes the following specific applications:
a. The Research Organization, Subcontractors and Interviewers shall make every reasonable effort to ensure that the Respondent understands the purpose of the Interviewer/Respondent contact.
(1) The Interviewer/Research Company representative must provide prompt and honest identification of his/her research firm affiliation.

(2) Respondent questions should be answered in a forthright and non-deceptive manner.
b. Deceptive practices and misrepresentation, such as using research as a guide for sales or solicitation purposes, are expressly prohibited.
c. Survey Research Organizations must respect the right of individuals to refuse to be interviewed or to terminate an interview in progress. Techniques that infringe on these rights should not be employed, but Survey Research Organizations may make reasonable efforts to obtain an interview including: (1) explaining the purpose of the research project; (2) providing a gift or monetary incentive adequate to elicit cooperation; and (3) re-contacting an individual at a different time if the individual is unwilling or unable to participate during the initial contact.

d. Research Organizations are responsible for arranging interviewing times that are convenient for respondents.

e. Lengthy interviews can be a burden. Research Organizations are responsible for weighing the research need against the length of the interview and Respondents must not be enticed into an interview by a misrepresentation of the length of the interview.

f. Research Organizations are responsible for developing techniques to minimize the discomfort or apprehension of Respondents and Interviewers when dealing with sensitive subject matter.

g. Electronic equipment (taping, recording, photographing) and one-way viewing rooms may be used only with the full knowledge of Respondents.
3. Internet Research

The unique characteristics of Internet research require specific notice that the principle of respondent privacy applies to this new technology and data collection methodology. The general principle of this section of the Code is that survey Research Organizations will not use unsolicited emails to recruit survey respondents or engage in surreptitious data collection methods. This section is organized into three parts: (A) email solicitations, (B) active agent technologies, and (C) panel/sample source considerations.

a. Email Solicitation
(1) Research Organizations are required to verify that individuals contacted for research by email have a reasonable expectation that they will receive email contact for research. Such agreement can be assumed when ALL of the following conditions exist:

a. A substantive pre-existing relationship exists between the individuals contacted and the Research Organization, the Client supplying email addresses, or the Internet Sample Providers supplying the email addresses (the latter being so identified in the email invitation);

b. Survey email invitees have a reasonable expectation, based on the pre-existing relationship where survey email invitees have specifically opted in for Internet research with the research company or Sample Provider, or in the case of Client-supplied lists that they may be contacted for research and invitees have not opted out of email communications;

c. Survey email invitations clearly communicate the name of the sample provider, the relationship of the individual to that provider, and clearly offer the choice to be removed from future email contact.

d. The email sample list excludes all individuals who have previously requested removal from future email contact in an appropriate and timely manner.

e. Participants in the email sample were not recruited via unsolicited email invitations.
(2) Research Organizations are prohibited from using any subterfuge in obtaining email addresses of potential respondents, such as collecting email addresses from public domains, using technologies or techniques to collect email addresses without individuals' awareness, and collecting email addresses under the guise of some other activity.

(3) Research Organizations are prohibited from using false or misleading return email addresses or any other false and misleading information when recruiting respondents. As stated later in this Code, Research Organizations must comply with all federal regulations that govern survey research activities. In addition, Research Organizations should use their best efforts to comply with other federal regulations that govern unsolicited email contacts, even though they do not apply to survey research.

(4) When receiving email lists from Clients or Sample Providers, Research Organizations are required to have the Client or Sample Provider verify that individuals listed have a reasonable expectation that they will receive email contact, as defined, in (1) above.

(5) The practice of "blind studies” (for sample sources where the sponsor of the study is not cited in the email solicitation) is permitted if disclosure is offered to the respondent during or after the interview. The respondent must also be offered the opportunity to "opt-out” for future research use of the sample source that was used for the email solicitation.

(6) Information about the CASRO Code of Standards and Ethics for Survey Research should be made available to respondents.
b. Active Agent Technology
(1) Active agent technology is defined as any software or hardware device that captures the behavioral data about data subjects in a background mode, typically running concurrently with other activities. This category includes tracking software that allows Research Organizations to capture a wide array of information about data subjects as they browse the Internet. Such technology needs to be carefully managed by the research industry via the application of research best practices.

Active agent technology also includes direct to desktop software downloaded to a user's computer that is used solely for the purpose of alerting potential survey respondents, downloading survey content or asking survey questions. A direct to desktop tool does not track data subjects as they browse the Internet and all data collected is provided directly from user input.

Data collection typically requires an application to download onto the subjects' desktop, laptop or PDA (including personal wireless devices). Once downloaded, tracking software has the capability of capturing the data subject's actual experiences when using the Internet such as Web page hits, web pages visited, online transactions completed, online forms completed, advertising click-through rates or impressions, and online purchases.

Beyond the collection of information about a user's Internet experience, the software has the ability to capture information from the data subject's email and other documents stored on a computer device such as a hard disk. Some of this technology has been labeled "spyware,” especially because the download or installation occurs without the data subject's full knowledge and specific consent. The use of spyware by a member of CASRO is strictly prohibited.

A cookie (defined as a small amount of data that is sent to a computer's browser from a web server and stored on the computer's hard drive) is not an active agent. The use of cookies is permitted if a description of the data collected and its use is fully disclosed in a Research Organizations' privacy policy.

(2) Following is a list of unacceptable practices that Research Organizations should strictly forbid or prevent. A Research Organization is considered to be using spyware when it fails to adopt all of the practices in set forth in Section 3 below or engages in any in the following practices:

a. Downloading software without obtaining the data subject's informed consent.

b. Downloading software without providing full notice and disclosure about the types of information that will be collected about the data subject, and how this information may be used. This notice needs to be conspicuous and clearly written.

c. Collecting information that identifies the data subject without obtaining affirmed consent.

d. Using keystroke loggers without obtaining the data subject's affirmed consent.

e. Installing software that modifies the data subject's computer settings beyond that which is necessary to conduct research providing that the software doesn't make other installed software behave erratically or in unexpected ways.

f. Installing software that turns off anti-spyware, anti-virus, or anti-spam software.

g. Installing software that seizes control or hijacks the data subject's computer.

h. Failing to make commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that the software does not cause any conflicts with major operating systems and does not cause other installed software to behave erratically or in unexpected ways.

i. Installing software that is hidden within other software that may be downloaded.

j. Installing software that is difficult to uninstall.

k. Installing software that delivers advertising content, with the exception of software for the purpose of ad testing.

l. Installing upgrades to software without notifying users

m. Changing the nature of the active agent program without notifying user

n. Failing to notify the user of privacy practice changes relating to upgrades to the software
(3) Following are practices Research Organizations that deploy active agent technologies should adopt. Research Organizations that adopt these practices and do not engage in any of the practices set forth in Section 2 above will not be considered users of spyware.

a. Transparency to the data subject is critical. Research companies must disclose information about active agents and other software in a timely and open manner with each data subject. This communication must provide details on how the Research Organization uses and shares the data subject's information.

i. Only after receiving an affirmed consent or permission from the data subject or parent's permission for children under the age of 18, should any research software be downloaded onto the individual's computer or PDA.

ii. Clearly communicate to the data subject the types of data if any that is being collected and stored by an active agent technology.

iii. Disclosure is also needed to allow the data subject to easily uninstall research software without prejudice or harm to them or their computer systems.

iv. Personal information about the subject should not be used for secondary purposes or shared with third parties without the data subject's consent.

v. Research Organizations are obligated to ensure that participation is a conscious and voluntary activity. Accordingly, incentives must never be used to hide or obfuscate the acceptance of active agent technologies.

vi. Research Organizations that deploy active agent technologies should have a method to receive queries from end-users who have questions or concerns. A redress process is essential for companies if they want to gauge audience reaction to participation on the network.

vii. On a routine and ongoing basis, consistent with the stated policies of the Research Organization, data subjects who participate in the research network should receive clear periodic notification that they are actively recorded as participants, so as to insure that their participation is voluntary. This notice should provide a clearly defined method to uninstall the Research Organization's tracking software without causing harm to the data subject.
b. Stewardship of the data subject is critical. Research companies must take steps to protect information collected from data subjects.

i. Personal or sensitive data (as described in the Personal Data Classification Appendix) should not be collected. If collection is unavoidable, the data should be destroyed immediately. If destruction is not immediately possible, it: (a) should receive the highest level of data security and (b) should not be accessed or used for any purpose.

ii. Research Organizations have an obligation to establish safeguards that minimize the risk of data security and privacy threats to the data subject.

iii. It is important for Research Organizations to understand the impact of their technology on end-users, especially when their software downloads in a bundle with other comparable software products.

iv. Stewardship also requires the Research Organization to make commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that these "free” products are also safe, secure and do not cause undue privacy or data security risks.

v. Stewardship also requires a Research Organization that deploys active agent technologies to be proactive in managing its distribution of the software. Accordingly, companies must vigorously monitor their distribution channel and look for signs that suggest unusual events such as high churn rates.

vi. If unethical practices are revealed, responsible research companies should strictly terminate all future dealings with this distribution partner.
c. Panel / Sample Source Considerations the following applies to all Research Organizations that utilize the Internet and related technologies to conduct research.
(1) The Research Organization must:
a. Disclose to panel members that they are part of panel.
b. Obtain panelist's permission to collect and store information about the panelist.
c. Collect and keep appropriate records of panel member recruitment, including the source through which the panel member was recruited.
d. Collect and maintain records of panel member activity.
(2) Upon Client request, the Research Organization must disclose:
a. Panel composition information (including panel size, populations covered, and the definition of an active panelist).
b. Panel recruitment practice information.
c. Panel member activity.
d. Panel incentive plans.
e. Panel validation practices.
f. Panel quality practices.
g. Aggregate panel and study sample information (this information could include response rate information, panelist participation in other research by type and timeframe, see Responsibilities in Reporting to Clients and the Public).
h. Study related information such as email invitation(s), screener wording, dates of email invitations and reminders, and dates of fieldwork.
(3) Stewardship of the data collected from panelists is critical:
a. Panels must be managed in accordance with applicable data protection laws and regulations.
b. Personal or sensitive data should be collected and treated as specified in the Personal Data Classification Appendix.
c. Upon panelist request, the panelist must be informed about all personal data (relating to the panelist that is provided by the panelist, collected by an active agent, or otherwise obtained by an acceptable method specified in a Research Organization's privacy policy) maintained by the Research Organization. Any personal data that is indicated by panel member as not correct or obsolete must be corrected or deleted as soon as practicable.
(4) Panel members must be given a straightforward method for being removed from the panel if they choose. A request for removal must be completed as soon as practicable and the panelist must not be selected for future research studies.

(5) A privacy policy relating to use of data collected from or relating to the panel member must be in place and posted online. The privacy policy must be easy to find and use and must be regularly communicated to panelists. Any changes to the privacy policy must be communicated to panelists as soon as possible.

(6) Research Organizations should take steps to limit the number of survey invitations sent to targeted respondents by email solicitations or other methods over the Internet so as to avoid harassment and response bias caused by the repeated recruitment and participation by a given pool (or panel) of data subjects.

(7) Research Organizations should carefully select sample sources that appropriately fit research objectives and Client requirements. All sample sources must satisfy the requirement that survey participants have either opted-in for research or have a reasonable expectation that they will be contacted for research.

(8) Research Organizations should manage panels to achieve the highest possible research quality. This includes managing panel churn and promptly removing inactive panelists.

(9) Research Organizations must maintain survey identities and email domains that are used exclusively for research activities.

(10) If a Research Organization uses a sample source (including a panel owned by the Research Organization or a subcontractor) that is used for both survey research and direct marketing activities, the Research Organization has an obligation to disclose the nature of the marketing campaigns conducted with that sample source to Clients so that they can assess the potential for bias.

(11) All data collected on behalf of a Client must be kept confidential and not shared or used on behalf of another Client (see also Responsibilities to Clients).
(4) Privacy Laws and Regulations

a. Research Organizations must comply with existing state, federal, and international statutes and regulations governing privacy, data security, and the disclosure, receipt and use of personally-identifiable information (collectively "Privacy Laws”). Some of the Privacy Laws affecting Survey Research are limited to specific industries (e.g., financial and health care industries), respondent source (e.g., children), and/or international venues.
b. In instances in which privacy laws apply to Survey Research operations for specific industries or respondent source, Research Organizations will:
(1) Always enter into a confidentiality or "chain of trust” agreement when receiving and using legally-protected, personally-identifiable information from a source other than the data subject, insuring that the Research Organization will protect the information and only use it for the purposes specified in the agreement;

(2) Always require subcontractors and other third parties to whom they disclose personally-identifiable information to enter into confidentiality or "chain of trust” agreements that require such party(ies) to provide the same level of security and limitations of use and disclosure as the Research Organization;

(3) Always store or maintain personally-identifiable information in a verifiably secure location;

(4) Always control and limit accessibility to personally-identifiable information;

(5) Always use reasonable efforts to destroy personally-identifiable information once the survey is complete and validation has been conducted, unless the personally-identifiable information relates to Respondents in panels, to ongoing studies, or for some other critical research reason, or the research Client is legally or contractually obligated to require its service providers to maintain such information for a certain period of time and contractually imposes this requirement on the Research Organization;

(6) Never knowingly receive, use or disclose personally-identifiable information in a way that will cause the Research Organization or another party to violate any Privacy Law or agreement.
c. In order to conduct international research that requires either transmitting or receiving personally-identifiable information of Respondents, Research Organizations must comply in all material respects with international privacy laws and regulations, by, in the case of data transfers with a person or entity in the European Union, either (i) certifying their compliance with the privacy provisions described in the United States Safe Harbor Principles of the European Union Directive on Data Protection or (ii) satisfying an alternative method of complying in all material respects with the Directive. The EU Safe Harbor privacy principles are contained in the CASRO Model Privacy Policy and are as follows:

(1) Notice: A description of what information is collected, how it is collected, its purpose, and its disclosure to third parties.

(2) Choice: A statement of and procedures for allowing individuals to choose not to participate in the research and/or to have their personal information used or disclosed to a third party.

(3) Onward Transfer: A statement that personal information will be transferred only to third parties who are also in compliance with the Safe Harbor Principles.

(4) Access: Procedures to provide individuals with access to their personal information in order to correct, amend, or delete that information where it is inaccurate.

(5) Security: A description of the reasonable precautions taken to protect personal information from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, and destruction.

(6) Data Integrity: A statement that information will be used consistent with the purpose for which it was collected.

(7) Enforcement: A description of internal and external mechanisms for assuring compliance, and addressing and resolving disputes and complaints.
d. Research Organizations will, to the extent required by law or as necessary to fully and completely comply with the principles set forth in the section of this Code entitled Responsibilities to Respondents, adopt effective and comprehensive legal and operational policies, such as those set forth in CASRO's Privacy Protection Program, which will be updated as necessary to conform with additions to and changes in Privacy Laws.
II. Responsibilities to Clients

A. Relationships between a Survey Research Organization and Clients for whom the surveys are conducted should be of such a nature that they foster confidence and mutual respect. They must be characterized by honesty and confidentiality.

B. The following specific approaches describe in more detail the responsibilities of Research Organizations in this relationship:
1. A Survey Research Organization must assist its Clients in the design of effective and efficient studies that are to be carried out by the Research Company. If the Survey Research Organization questions whether a study design will provide the information necessary to serve the Client's purposes, it must make its reservations known.

2. A Research Organization must conduct the study in the manner agreed upon. However, if it becomes apparent in the course of the study that changes in the plans should be made, the Research Organization must make its views known to the Client promptly.

3. A Research Organization has an obligation to allow its Clients to verify that work performed meets all contracted specifications and to examine all operations of the Research Organization that are relevant to the proper execution of the project in the manner set forth. While Clients are encouraged to examine questionnaires or other records to maintain open access to the research process, the Survey Research Organization must continue to protect the confidentiality and privacy of survey Respondents.

4. When more than one Client contributes to the cost of a project specially commissioned with the Research Organization, each Client concerned shall be informed that there are other Participants (but not necessarily their identity).

5. Research Organizations will hold confidential all information that they obtain about a Client's general business operations, and about matters connected with research projects that they conduct for a Client.

6. For research findings obtained by the agency that are the property of the Client, the Research Organization may make no public release or revelation of findings without expressed, prior approval from the Client.
C. Bribery in any form and in any amount is unacceptable and is a violation of a Research Organization's fundamental, ethical obligations. A Research Organization and/or its principals, officers and employees should never give gifts to Clients in the form of cash. To the extent permitted by applicable laws and regulations, a Research Organization may provide nominal gifts to Clients and may entertain Clients, as long as the cost of such entertainment is modest in amount and incidental in nature.

III. Responsibilities in Reporting to Clients and the Public

A. When reports are being prepared for Client confidential or public release purposes, it is the obligation of the Research Organization to insure that the findings they release are an accurate portrayal of the survey data, and careful checks on the accuracy of all figures are mandatory.

B. A Research Organization's report to a Client or the Public should contain, or the Research Organization should be ready to supply to a Client or the Public on short notice, the following information about the survey:

1. The name of the organization for which the study was conducted and the name of the organization conducting it.

2. The purpose of the study, including the specific objectives.

3. The dates on or between which the data collection was done.

4. A definition of the universe that the survey is intended to represent and a description of the population frame(s) that was actually sampled.

5. A description of the sample design, including the method of selecting sample elements, method of interview, cluster size, number of callbacks, Respondent eligibility or screening criteria, and other pertinent information.

6. A description of results of sample implementation including (a) a total number of sample elements contacted, (b) the number not reached, (c) the number of refusals, (d) the number of terminations, (e) the number of non-eligible, (f) the number of completed interviews.

7. The basis for any specific "completion rate" percentages should be fully documented and described.

8. The questionnaire or exact wording of the questions used, including Interviewer directions and visual exhibits.

9. A description of any weighting or estimating procedures used.

10. A description of any special scoring, data adjustment or indexing procedures used. (Where the Research Organization uses proprietary techniques, these should be described in general and the Research Organization should be prepared to provide technical information on demand from qualified and technically competent persons who have agreed to honor the confidentiality of such information).

11. Estimates of the sampling error and of data should be shown when appropriate, but when shown they should include reference to other possible sources of error so that a misleading impression of accuracy or precision is not conveyed.

12. Statistical tables clearly labeled and identified as to questionnaire source, including the number of raw cases forming the base for each cross-tabulation.

13. Copies of Interviewer instructions, validation results, code books, and other important working papers.
C. As a minimum, any general public release of survey findings should include the following information:
1. The sponsorship of the study.

2. A description of the purposes.

3. The sample description and size.

4. The dates of data collection.

5. The names of the research company conducting the study.

6. The exact wording of the questions.

7. Any other information that a lay person would need to make a reasonable assessment of the reported findings.

D. A Survey Research Organization will seek agreements from Clients so that citations of survey findings will be presented to the Research Organization for review and clearance as to accuracy and proper interpretation prior to public release. A Research Organization will advise Clients that if the survey findings publicly disclosed are incorrect, distorted, or incomplete, in the Research Organization's opinion, the Research Organization reserves the right to make its own release of any or all survey findings necessary to make clarification.
IV. Responsibility to Outside Contractors and Interviewers

A. Research Organizations will not ask any Outside Contractor or Interviewer to engage in any activity which is not acceptable as defined in other sections of this Code of Standards and Ethics for Survey Research or related CASRO® publications.
1 Standard demographic data included in surveys are only considered "Ordinary Personal Data” if it is identifiable to an individual person.

2 Standard demographic data included in surveys are only considered "Sensitive Personal Data” if it is identifiable to an individual person. It may be necessary to create additional classification levels for data that is subject to specific statutory requirements, such as "personal health information” subject to HIPAA.

3 It may be necessary to create additional classification levels for data that is subject to specific statutory requirements, such as "personal health information” subject to HIPAA.

The process for writing the Code began with a review of existing industry codes (AAPOR, CAMRO, ESOMAR, and MRA) and codes in parallel industries. Many of the general themes were consistent, but they needed to be formulated to reflect the imperatives of full service research companies. This was meticulous work undertaken by Committee members who were smart, masters of the English language and experienced in the precision required for questionnaire writing. Every noun, verb, adjective, adverb, pronoun, period, comma, semicolon and colon was scrutinized. In the end a document was produced that was approved by the Board of Directors and by the membership.

The Code is a living document because the industry is dynamic and the research environment is ever-changing. The Code has been revised periodically to apply core standards to new phenomena – e.g., online interviewing and data privacy legislation.

The Committee discovered that there is a legal distinction between ethical standards and business practices. Ethical standards refer to a code of moral behavior toward key industry stakeholders. Adherence to these standards is required by all its members.

Business practices refer to company operations. CASRO is able to suggest best practices for a number of things: how long questionnaires are kept, when study files can be destroyed, etc. But CASRO cannot compel members to adopt these practices because there are cost implications that could create a playing field that is not level.

A related subject is the difference between ethics and contractual disputes. CASRO often is asked to intervene when a provider of services to a CASRO member has not been paid promptly or has been treated unfairly. These are not ethical issues. These are issues that relate to the contractual relationship between the two organizations. The remedy is either arbitration or legal action. (CASRO Code of Standards and Ethics History)

The Code of ethics is the prohibiting of selling or fund raising under the guise of conducting research. It is the maintenance of research integrity by avoiding misrepresentation and omission of pertinent research data. The code of ethics is also the treatment of outside clients and suppliers fairly. (Burns, chapter 2 page 35)
The marketing researcher facilitates the flow of information from the market or customer to the producer of the good or service. Ethical decision making in marketing research in three key areas where problems often arise: * In the relationship between the researcher and the client * Between the researcher and the research subject * Between the researcher and the marketing research industry

Situation 1: After a brilliant final presentation on a business-to-business market research study, the client thanks the researcher and then asks for the list of companies that responded to the survey, along with their survey responses, which could indicate whether they were currently in the market for the client's services.
Answer:

The Code of Professional Ethics and Practices of the American Association for Public Opinion Research requires that researchers "shall hold as privileged and confidential all information that might identify a respondent with his or her responses."
The use of respondent information for non-research purposes (such as that described in the situation above) can only take place if the respondents specifically grant permission to do so.

Situation 2: Besides best efforts, the surveyor was unable to shorten a personal interview questionnaire to less than 30 minutes in order to ask all the questions needed to address client's research objectives. With the knowledge that most of the subjects won't participate if told honestly about the time commitment. The boss suggests that simply state the survey will "only take a few minutes." Do the researcher take this advice and hope that once the interviews begin people will be reluctant to stop?
Answer:
CASRO places the responsibility on the researcher for "weighing the research need against the length of the interview" and specifically states that potential research subjects "must not be enticed into an interview by a misrepresentation of the length of the interview."

Situation 3: In a meeting with a new client for marketing research services. During the discussion, the client shows a previously commissioned research study from another marketing research provider. The researcher notices the research design, qualitative study was completely inappropriate for the research purpose a quantitative estimate of market potential. The potential client states that they "really liked" the previous study and asks if it can be replicate it in another product category.
Answer:

Professionalism and fairness are essential in ethical behavior, The American Marketing Association (AMA) Code of Ethics warns against taking advantage of situations in such a way that "unfairly deprives or damages the organization of others." The ICC/ESOMAR International Code of Marketing and Social Research Practice stipulates that researchers "must not unjustifiably criticize or disparage other Researchers."
The Code of Professional Ethics and Practices, which states: "We shall not knowingly make interpretations of research results, nor shall we tacitly permit interpretations that are inconsistent with the data available."(The Ethics of Marketing Research; Fodness)

References:
Report on the Ethical Issues Involved in Marketing Research Base on the CASRO Code of Standards and Ethics for Survey Research
REPORT ON THE ETHICAL ISSUES INVOLVED IN MARKETING RESEARCH
BASE ON THE CASRO CODE OF STANDARDS AND ETHICS
FOR SURVEY RESEARCH
Bylaws casro@casro.org casro@casro.org CASRO Code of Standards and Ethics History & Overview: By John Gilfeather https://www.casro.org/.../code/casro_code_history&overview.pdf
The Ethics of Marketing Research: Can I? Should I? Would I?: by Dale Fodness January 4, 2005 http://www.marketingprofs.com/5/fodness1.asp#ixzz36vk3ISdl
Burns, A. C., & Bush, R. F. (2012). Basic Marketing Research (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Chapter 2.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Report on the Ethical Issues Involved in Marketing Research Base on the Casro Code of Standards and Ethics for Survey Research

...IN MARKETING RESEARCH BASE ON THE CASRO CODE OF STANDARDS AND ETHICS FOR SURVEY RESEARCH The Council of American Survey and Research Organizations (CASRO) were founded in 1975, which represents over 300 companies and market research operations in the United States and abroad. The philosophy of CASRO is to “require their members to adhere to the CASRO Code of Standards and Ethics for Survey Research, a tough, internationally-cited set of standards which has long been the benchmark for the industry. The Code has been organized into sections describing the the responsibilities of a survey research organization to Respondents, Clients and Outside Contractors and in reporting study results”. Here in this report, the writer would like to focus on the ethical issues that research firms often violate, and has denied to follow the Code of Standards and Ethics from CASRO. The three popular ethical issues are presented and discussed below. There are four main responsibilities in the CASRO Code if Standards and Ethics: Responibilities to Respondents, Responsibilities to Clients, Responsibilities in Reporting to Clients and the Public, and Responsibilities to Outside Contractors and Interviewers. However, the writer of this report will focus mainly on the Responsibilities to Respondent as the ethical issues of this part are now dramatically increasing. In the Section 3 of Part A – Confidentiality belong to I.Responsibilities to Respondents (CASRO Code of Standards and Ethics), the...

Words: 1520 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Unit Viii Report

...Marketing research can also be used as a measuring stick to see how a company stacks up against the competition (Burns & Bush, 2012). Marketing research is used to added value to the bottom in most companies. Sometimes issues related to ethics come into play with marketing research. Information may be used inappropriately to gain an advantage in an industry or for personal gain. There have been professional organizations established to deal with the ethical behavior associated with marketing research. One such organization is the Council of American Survey Research (CASRO). It has established a code of standards and ethics for survey research. The purpose of this paper is to look at some of the ethical issues involved in marketing research from the CASRO code of standards and ethics. CASRO was founded in 1975. There are over 300 companies and marketing research operations worldwide who are members. All members of the CASRO have to follow the Code of Standards and Ethics for Survey Research. This code is highly regarded in the industry. The code has four main sections all related to the responsibilities involving issues that relate to ethical conduct that may arise during...

Words: 1819 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Greeeeeen

...Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 69, No. 2, Summer 2005, pp. 232–245 THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE ADVANCE MAILINGS IN A TELEPHONE SURVEY LARRY A. HEMBROFF DEBRA RUSZ Michigan State University ANN RAFFERTY HARRY MCGEE Michigan Department of Community Health NATHANIEL EHRLICH Michigan State University Abstract Advance letters are being used increasingly to combat the decline in response rates, but their effectiveness depends partly on their being read. In the face of the post-9/11 anthrax mailing scare, the Office for Survey Research (OSR) converted to using advance postcards rather than advance letters. Subsequently, the OSR conducted an experiment to test the effectiveness of sending letters, postcards, or nothing to directory-listed numbers selected in a large random digit dial (RDD) telephone survey. In terms of response rates, the results clearly indicate that sending advance letters is more effective than sending postcards, which, in turn, is more effective than sending nothing. A detailed cost-effectiveness evaluation indicates that sending letters actually saves money, despite the increased costs associated with the mailings, compared to sending postcards; sending postcards is also more cost-effective than not sending anything. Introduction Response rates in surveys have been declining for several decades (Groves and Couper 1998; Steeh 1981; Steeh et al. 2001), and the rate of decline increased after the mid-1990s (Curtin, Presser, and Singer 2005; Smith...

Words: 5447 - Pages: 22

Free Essay

Nursing Theory

...Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Weekly / Vol. 59 / No. 35 September 10, 2010 State-Specific Trends in Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among Adults — United States, 2000–2009 A diet high in fruits and vegetables can reduce the risk for many leading causes of death (1–3) and can play an important role in weight management (4). Healthy People 2010 objectives for fruits and vegetables include targets of increasing to 75% the proportion of persons aged ≥2 years who consume two or more servings of fruit daily and to 50% those who consume three or more servings of vegetables daily.* To assess states’ progress over the past decade in meeting these targets among adults and to provide an update of the 2005 subgroup estimates (5), CDC analyzed data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). This report describes the results of that analysis, which indicated that, in 2009, an estimated 32.5% of adults consumed fruit two or more times per day and 26.3% consumed vegetables three or more times per day, far short of the national targets. Overall, the proportion of adults who met the fruit target declined slightly, but significantly, from 34.4% in 2000 to 32.5% in 2009; no significant change was observed in meeting the vegetable target. No state met either target, and substantial variability occurred among states. Only one state had statistically significant increases in the percentages of adults meeting each target. These findings underscore the need for interventions...

Words: 539 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Madison Children's Hospital

...Madison Children’s Hospital: Chronic Health Illness Program HSM 270 Abstract Madison Children’s Hospital has been serving the multi-cultural rich county of Orange, California since 1960. For more than 50 years, Madison Children’s hospital (MCH) has been steadfastly committed to providing the highest quality medical care to children. MCH has provided medical care to over 1 million children in the county of Orange. Our regional pediatric healthcare network includes a state-of-the-art main hospital facility in the City of Orange. Madison Children’s Clinic also offers many primary and specialty care services to the community. Madison Children’s hospital has recorded an increase in the amount of children and adolescents ages 0-21 with chronic illnesses. This has brought a concern to the community as well as Madison Children’s Hospital. MCH is dedicated to assisting and enriching health services, as well as developing programs to benefit the families of Orange County. MCH is proposing a funding opportunity to become a leader in research and discover, educated future generations, and enhance the health and well being of not only the children in the county of Orange, but worldwide. Madison Children’s Hospital is proposing funding for the Chronic Health Illness Program (CHIP). The CHIP program will provide all its services in a family-centered in-patient and out-patient facility to ensure continuity and cost effective care. The program serves infants to young adults...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Burnsmr7E Tif Ch02

...Marketing Research, 7/E (Burns/Bush) Chapter 2 The Marketing Research Industry 1) Which of the following professional organizations is devoted to improving the quality of the marketing research industry and to ensuring the future of the marketing research profession? A) AMA (American Marketing Association) B) MRA (Marketing Research Association) C) QRCA (Q Research Council & Association) D) AAPOR (American Association for Public Opinion Research) E) CASRO (Council of American Survey Research Organizations) Answer: B Difficulty: Easy Objective: 1 Question type: Concept Course LO: Define the nature and role of marketing research 2) The marketing research industry has a certification program for marketing researchers, and this certification program is hosted by: A) American Marketing Association. B) Research Certification Board. C) Marketing Research Corporation. D) Marketing Research Association. E) Association of Specialized and Professional Accreditors. Answer: D Difficulty: Easy Objective: 1 Question type: Concept Course LO: Define the nature and role of marketing research 3) What did the Marketing Research Association do in 2005 that changed the credentialing of marketing research professionals? A) They brought a lawsuit against several practitioners who were not qualified to practice marketing research. B) They required all practitioners to take a test on qualitative research methods. C) They created the Professional Researcher Certification...

Words: 5905 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

Business Research

...Business Research Methods Cooper 12th Edition Solutions Manual Click here to download the solutions manual INSTANTLY!!! http://www.solutionsmanualtestbank.com/products/2014/10/2 6/business-research-methods-cooper-12th-edition-solutionsmanual Business Research Methods Cooper 12th Edition Solutions Manual Business Research Methods Cooper Schindler 12th Edition Solutions Manual ***THIS IS NOT THE ACTUAL TEXTBOOK. YOU ARE PURCHASING the Solution Manual in e-version of the following textbook*** Name: Business Research Methods Author: Cooper Schindler Edition: 12th ISBN-10: 0073521507 Type: Solutions Manual - The file contains solutions and questions to all chapters and all questions. All the files are carefully checked and accuracy is ensured. - The file is either in .doc, .pdf, excel, or zipped in the package and can easily be read on PCs and Macs. - Delivery is INSTANT. You can download the files IMMEDIATELY once payment is done. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Our response is the fastest. All questions will always be answered in 6 hours. This is the quality of service we are providing and we hope to be your helper. Delivery is in the next moment. Solution Manual is accurate. Buy now below and the DOWNLOAD LINK WILL APPEAR IMMEDIATELY once payment is done! Prepare to receive your Business Research Methods Solution Manual in the next moment. -------------------------------------Business Research Methods Solution Manual Business Research Methods 12th...

Words: 8218 - Pages: 33

Premium Essay

Smart Phone Securities

...Smartphone Security Survey of U.S. consumers Sponsored by AVG Technologies Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: March 2011 Ponemon Institute© Research Report Smartphone Security Survey of U.S. Consumers Ponemon Institute, March 2011 Part 1. Introduction Ponemon Institute is pleased to present the findings of the Smartphone Security Survey: A Study of U.S. Consumers sponsored by AVG Technologies. The goal of the research is to determine consumers’ perceptions about the potential privacy and security risks when using their smartphones. In addition, we wanted to learn if participants in our study care about these risks and if they take security precautions. We surveyed 734 consumers who are 18 years and older and own a smartphone. The risks that we address in our survey concern location tracking, transmission of confidential payment without the user’s knowledge or consent, diallerware (specialized malware unique to smartphones), spyware, viruses from insecure WiFi networks and others. What we learned is that most of the consumers in our study are using their smartphones without understanding that they are exposing their sensitive information to the risks listed above. We also believe the findings of this study signal a potential security risk for organizations because so many consumers surveyed use their smartphones for both business and personal use. With business confidential information stored on these smartphones, organizations should...

Words: 7043 - Pages: 29

Premium Essay

2012 Us Cost of Cyber Crime Study Final6

...2012 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States Sponsored by HP Enterprise Security Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: October 2012 Ponemon Institute© Research Report 2012 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States Benchmark Study of U.S. Companies Ponemon Institute October 2012 Part 1. Executive Summary We are pleased to present the 2012 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States, which is the third annual study of US companies. Sponsored by HP Enterprise Security, this year’s study is based on a representative sample of 56 organizations in various industry sectors. While our research focused on organizations located in the United States, many are multinational corporations. For the first time, Ponemon Institute conducted cyber crime cost studies for companies in the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia and Japan. The findings from this research are presented in separate reports. Cyber attacks generally refer to criminal activity conducted via the Internet. These attacks can include stealing an organization’s intellectual property, confiscating online bank accounts, creating and distributing viruses on other computers, posting confidential business information on the Internet and disrupting a country’s critical national infrastructure. Consistent with the previous two studies, the loss or misuse of information is the most significant consequence of a cyber attack. Based on these findings, organizations need to be more vigilant...

Words: 9057 - Pages: 37

Premium Essay

Chapter 4 Managing Marketing Information to Gain Customer Insights

...Part 1: Defining Marketing and the Marketing Process (Chapters 1–2) Part 2: Understanding the Marketplace and Consumers (Chapters 3–6) Part 3: Designing a Customer-Driven Strategy and Mix (Chapters 7–17) Part 4: Extending Marketing (Chapters 18–20) 4 Marketing Information to Gain Managing Customer Insights Chapter Preview In this chapter, we continue our exploration of how marketers gain insights into consumers and the marketplace. We look at how companies develop and manage information about important marketplace elements: customers, competitors, products, and marketing programs. To succeed in today’s marketplace, companies must know how to turn mountains of marketing information into fresh customer insights that will help them deliver greater value to customers. Let’s start with a good story about marketing research and customer insights in action at P&G, one of the world’s largest and most re- spected marketing companies. P&G makes and markets a who’s who list of consumer megabrands, including the likes of Tide, Crest, Bounty, Charmin, Puffs, Pampers, Pringles, Gillette, Dawn, Ivory, Febreze, Swiffer, Olay, Cover Girl, Pantene, Scope, NyQuil, Duracell, and dozens more. The company’s stated purpose is to provide products that “improve the lives of the world’s consumers.” P&G’s brands really do create value for consumers by solving their problems. But to build meaningful relationships with customers, you first have to understand them and how...

Words: 26161 - Pages: 105